Comments Thread For: Jacobs' Trainer: If That Was Danny - Golovkin Would Be on His Ass!

[Boxing Logic]

Didn't read

Do you accept my IP permaban or not?

I already know from your posts that you don't read facts about boxing. Keep defending fighters who duck the best in their own weight class for four years, while criticizing fighters who chase the best in three separate weight classes. It just exposes your bias.

[Boxing Logic]

Maybe you missed the part of him bringing Floyd up for no reason other then being a butt hurt pac fan that jumped shipped kimmy boy? I didn't know using the term "#48" automatically qualifies you as a floydie fan, take your ranting bias racist a$$ back on Twitter and spew your trash there

You follow me on twitter? I appreciate the support. The P4P Team wouldn't be able to do what we do without the fans. I love the fans. Viva la Mexico. Cha cha cha, cha cha cha. Please continue to support me. Whether you write good things or bad things, just keep writing them. Mexico.

#48 is a term invented by Floyd fans so the fact you use it is a dead giveaway. The term itself casts Pacquiao's career not from a neutral perspective, but from a strictly Floyd Mayweather fan perspective that views Pacquiao as just another guy Floyd "beat." That's the whole meaning of the term so anyone who uses it is putting forth a pro-Mayweather perspective, which is what Floyd Mayweather fans do, which you clearly are.

Like I said, you're not good at hiding it. And I'm no racist. Julian Williams is one of my new favorite fighters. I just hope Charlo doesn't become another Haymon fighter to duck. Since most the best fighters are on HBO, Haymon fighters can usually use politics as an excuse to duck guys they wouldn't be willing to fight anyway, but with Charlo and JRoc both with the same adviser, Charlo has had to maybe fake an injury instead, and then he may try to find other ways of delaying the fight. Seeing as Deontay Wilder just did something similar it seems to be a pattern. Use politics to duck HBO fighters, use injuries to duck Showtime fighters.

As Peter Quillin tweeted, he's not in boxing for the sport, just for the money. It's clear most Haymon fighters are the same way. It's well known in boxing now: if you are actually good, and you think you can be great and beat the best, sign with HBO. If you are a pretender who isn't capable of beating the best, but wants to pretend to be a star, sign with Al Haymon. This explains why all the best pound for pound fighters are on HBO. It's not a race thing, it's a talent and confidence thing. Look at Terence Crawford, he's black but he's not been afraid of the best so far, so he's on HBO. Same with Timothy Bradley. So it has nothing to do with race. It's all about talent and confidence.

But JRoc is awesome. I would like to see that fight against Charlo so since there are no "politics" involved, and the fight was already mandated long before this, back before Charlo fought Trout, I hope Charlo doesn't try to avoid it again now for the second time. We'll see, but you know how Haymon fighters operate.

[Chrismart]

'If' being the noticeable word.
Jacobs, Eubank and Canelo have done a lot of talking recently, but 'if' means nothing if you are vacating belts, wanting 18 months preparation time and walking away from contracts.

In the ring is where it's done. Now Jacobs has that chance after him being mandated. Let's hope they take it.

[Can'tHoldMeBack]

You follow me on twitter? I appreciate the support. The P4P Team wouldn't be able to do what we do without the fans. I love the fans. Viva la Mexico. Cha cha cha, cha cha cha. Please continue to support me. Whether you write good things or bad things, just keep writing them. Mexico.

#48 is a term invented by Floyd fans so the fact you use it is a dead giveaway. The term itself casts Pacquiao's career not from a neutral perspective, but from a strictly Floyd Mayweather fan perspective that views Pacquiao as just another guy Floyd "beat." That's the whole meaning of the term so anyone who uses it is putting forth a pro-Mayweather perspective, which is what Floyd Mayweather fans do, which you clearly are.

Like I said, you're not good at hiding it. And I'm no racist. Julian Williams is one of my new favorite fighters.

It's a term to piss off the pac fans that's butt hurt about him losing, using the term does not make you a fan of Floyd, the school you went to for your Ph.D. in determining what other people think have gotten rich off another fool because again you clearly missed him bringing up Floyd like most butt hurt #48 fans do when thread has nothing to do with him.... You guys think anybody that criticize GGG have to be a Floyd fan which is very comical and shows the bias you attempt to throw onto others

[Can'tHoldMeBack]

You follow me on twitter? I appreciate the support. The P4P Team wouldn't be able to do what we do without the fans. I love the fans. Viva la Mexico. Cha cha cha, cha cha cha. Please continue to support me. Whether you write good things or bad things, just keep writing them. Mexico.

#48 is a term invented by Floyd fans so the fact you use it is a dead giveaway. The term itself casts Pacquiao's career not from a neutral perspective, but from a strictly Floyd Mayweather fan perspective that views Pacquiao as just another guy Floyd "beat." That's the whole meaning of the term so anyone who uses it is putting forth a pro-Mayweather perspective, which is what Floyd Mayweather fans do, which you clearly are.

Like I said, you're not good at hiding it. And I'm no racist. Julian Williams is one of my new favorite fighters. I just hope Charlo doesn't become another Haymon fighter to duck. Since most the best fighters are on HBO, Haymon fighters can usually use politics as an excuse to duck guys they wouldn't be willing to fight anyway, but with Charlo and JRoc both with the same adviser, Charlo has had to maybe fake an injury instead, and then he may try to find other ways of delaying the fight. Seeing as Deontay Wilder just did something similar it seems to be a pattern. Use politics to duck HBO fighters, use injuries to duck Showtime fighters.

As Peter Quillin tweeted, he's not in boxing for the sport, just for the money. It's clear most Haymon fighters are the same way. It's well known in boxing now: if you are actually good, and you think you can be great and beat the best, sign with HBO. If you are a pretender who isn't capable of beating the best, but wants to pretend to be a star, sign with Al Haymon. This explains why all the best pound for pound fighters are on HBO. It's not a race thing, it's a talent and confidence thing. Look at Terence Crawford, he's black but he's not been afraid of the best so far, so he's on HBO. Same with Timothy Bradley. So it has nothing to do with race. It's all about talent and confidence.

But JRoc is awesome. I would like to see that fight against Charlo so since there are no "politics" involved, and the fight was already mandated long before this, back before Charlo fought Trout, I hope Charlo doesn't try to avoid it again now for the second time. We'll see, but you know how Haymon fighters operate.

You edited and added all that extra bs for what? Lol again you guys need to stay on topic this was about Jacobs and GGG, y'all go and start adding all this extra crap for no reason.

[Scipio2009]

lol jacobs would have gotten the pirog treatment again if he was taking the shots that brook took.I dare say brook has a sturdier chin than jacobs does.

Have you actually watched the Pirog fight? lol. from your comment, it's obvious that you haven't (and never in his life, in all likelihood, has Golovkin ever switched his feet to set up and bait-counter on anyone).

[bronx7]

Moras counter he was flat footed what about pirog ko? Jacobs has b- chin watch and learn

[Bigg Rigg]

Too bad ya clown ass ninjas want like $10 million dollars to get in there with big bad Golovkin. I don't wanna hear **** from Jacobs camp.

[i'm a fun haver]

Too bad ya clown ass ninjas want like $10 million dollars to get in there with big bad Golovkin. I don't wanna hear **** from Jacobs camp.

Don't forget about the split network PPV as well because Floyd-Pac

[Scipio2009]

Danny plans to return in December at Barclays, but he wants to fight GGG next? How does the B-side of the negotiation already have a date and venue they picked out, without any negotiation with the A-side, if they actually want to fight him next?

More BS. And what is this BS about the political issues? Danny has no exclusive network contract, therefore, he can fight wherever he wants. Al Haymon is just supposed to be his "adviser." If that's all Al is, then you can take his advice to keep fighting bums on Showtime, or leave his advice! It's up to Jacobs, not Haymon, because that's the definition of an adviser! Last I checked his title wasn't "mandater" or "forcer." He's just supposed to advise so if Jacobs really wants GGG, fight him already!

The WBA has officially mandated the fight; if the negotiations break down (as I expect them to), the purse bid will be called early October, with the fight having to be stage before the end of January.

I don't see how Jacobs, after just fighting last week, having a likely late December date penciled in (for a fight that's already been mandated) as being an impediment to anything.

No different than the WBC mandating Stevenson-Kovalev as a 50/50 split, with the purse bid called to see which promoter would handle the event.

Not sure why you're shocked.