Brook. Khan. Who Is The Greater Fighter?

[soul_survivor]

I'm curious as to how the Brook voters are defining great? Is it purely based on a mythical, who wins if they fight? Or an actual solid fights fought and achievements?

So, I'm just reposting.

ANyone want to categorise why Kell is "greater" ?

[BM dnobagaV]

Beating Shawn Porter alone is better than anything Khan has done in his career. That is the sad truth.

Brook is better by miles, that's the first thing. Greater is subject especially as none of them are great or have done anything in their careers to be considered great.

Bruh are you ******ed?
A win over Porter > wins over Maidana, Algieri, Judah, Devon, Kotelnik, Malignaggi(before he was shot), and Peterson(robbery)?

Maybe Porter is a better single win, but even that's stretching it considering he's incredibly limited, and this is coming from a big Porter fan..

At some point, Khan's quantity far outweighs Kell's "quality".

[JakeTheBoxer]

Khan had more difficult fights, not even close. But Brook seems to have better chin. If they fight, i pick Brook.

[Doctor_Tenma]

Resume, Khan and it's not even close. Skills, IQ, Brook and that's not even close as well. That said, I see Brook accomplishing more than Khan when it's all said and done.

[AliBombaye]

Resume, Khan and it's not even close. Skills, IQ, Brook and that's not even close as well. That said, I see Brook accomplishing more than Khan when it's all said and done.

Yeh good luck to Brook winning a non paper belt at 154 and let's see if he will go to 147 to face Spence, highly doubt Brook ends up with a better career than Khan when it's all said and done.

[Dean_Razorback]

so far, khan has achieved more, has the better victories. but he is a delusional moron and would get beaten by brook.

[R_Walken]

You must be that special kind of ******ed.

Yeah whatever man, I'm getting that same feeling from they way your defending your man

[LacedUp]

Bruh are you ******ed?
A win over Porter > wins over Maidana, Algieri, Judah, Devon, Kotelnik, Malignaggi(before he was shot), and Peterson(robbery)?

Maybe Porter is a better single win, but even that's stretching it considering he's incredibly limited, and this is coming from a big Porter fan..

At some point, Khan's quantity far outweighs Kell's "quality".

Obviously I meant win for win not shawn porter > khan's whole career.

[LacedUp]

Yeh good luck to Brook winning a non paper belt at 154 and let's see if he will go to 147 to face Spence, highly doubt Brook ends up with a better career than Khan when it's all said and done.

wouldn't take a lot. he's about one win away.

[JakeTheBoxer]

highly doubt Brook ends up with a better career than Khan when it's all said and done.

Right. Brook maybe took a GGG payday too soon. Khan has had better reputation as a fighter, he has had wins over Barrera, Malignaggi, Maidana, Judah, Alexander, Algieri, Collazo and he could have afforded Canelo fight. But brook has had a very thin resume, he should have built his resume at 147 against some good guys instead of hopless fight against 160 champ..Now it will be much more difficult, GGG seriuosly hurt him..