PAC and Bradley are clearly more talented and have been around longer and clearly deserve more plaudits, Thurmn and Spence arguably have finer accomplishments at the weight than Brook himself, the way Spence destroyed Bundu and Algieri show me what Brook has achieved which is better ? Thurman handled Porter more convincingly imo and has more equally impressive victories than Brook. Then their is Khan, he has achieved as much and more than Brook too against a higher level of opposition than Brook.
I'll agree Brook is around top 3-4 if you consider Thurman, sSpsnce and Kahn all at the same level, I mean I guess we're splitting hairs here and I really don't care too, fact is Brook vs GGG is still a mismatch, a glorified one at that. What I don't understand is why GGG fans just don't come out and say it's a cash grab instead of attempting to dress it up as something it clearly is not.
I'll agree Brook is around top 3-4 if you consider Thurman, sSpsnce and Kahn all at the same level, I mean I guess we're splitting hairs here and I really don't care too, fact is Brook vs GGG is still a mismatch, a glorified one at that. What I don't understand is why GGG fans just don't come out and say it's a cash grab instead of attempting to dress it up as something it clearly is not.
Comment