Agreed Wlad > GGG but not the same scenario. Fury was the bigger man and Wlad was well past it.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Fury: GGG is not as good as champion as WLAD, and I beat him...
Collapse
-
-
He beat a 41 year old boxer. If he had beaten him many years ago it would have been much more impressive. Wlad wasn't going to last forever. Someone was going to beat him eventually and it happened to be Fury. Fury fought him at the right time. No boxer except possibly Hopkins is remotely close to their prime at age 41. If Brook beats the 34 year old GGG it's a much more impressive win and a bigger upset than the 27 year old Fury beating the 41 year old Wlad.
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by boliodogs View PostHe beat a 41 year old boxer. If he had beaten him many years ago it would have been much more impressive. Wlad wasn't going to last forever. Someone was going to beat him eventually and it happened to be Fury. Fury fought him at the right time. No boxer except possibly Hopkins is remotely close to their prime at age 41. If Brook beats the 34 year old GGG it's a much more impressive win and a bigger upset than the 27 year old Fury beating the 41 year old Wlad.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tyrone Biggums! View PostYour point?.......
Comment
Comment