WHo looked better beating Porter?

[jmrf4435]

Thurman or Brook?????

[-2 Scrappy-]

Brook won more comfortably but Thurman won in style with a war.

[jmrf4435]

"Brook won more comfortably but Thurman won in style with a war."

Brook looked like the better boxer for sure. Never really looked in danger from porter, was in complete control.

[Citizen Koba]

Brook. But Keith is slightly more proven overall. H2H? I'm not sure, I'd probably lean towards Brook, and I think Spense could give both a run for their money (though I'm not fully sold on the Truth yet either).

[Chrismart]

I thought Brook controlled the fight better, and won by a bigger margin.

[LoadedWraps]

"Brook won more comfortably but Thurman won in style with a war."

Brook looked like the better boxer for sure. Never really looked in danger from porter, was in complete control.

I thought Brook controlled the fight better, and won by a bigger margin.

Yup.

The Thurman fight was a better fight in part because it was also a closer fight. Porter was getting his licks in and they were evenly matched for the most part.

Brook was closer to "boxing lesson" territory. He was always in control.

[massa of demos]

Brook schooled Porter. Thurman went life and death.

[spenz]

For me it's brook. Thurman took a lot of damage in that fight.

[R_Walken]

I think all you guys are high as f.uck

Thurman looked better he couldn't have clinched the entire fight and won ugly like Brook but he chose to fight

I honestly didn't think Porter /Thurman was close probably 9-3 ,8-4 Thurman

I think I had Brook beating Porter 7-5 maybe 8-4 but I don't think it was all that impressive just held on all night. I think it's more of a case of Porter not being able to adjust and just running into the clinch then Brook actually looking good

[soul_survivor]

Considering I felt Porter won the fight and was closer either way, I think Thurman should be rematching Porter asap.

So Brook looked better and showed he was a level above Porter, i.e. a true world class fighter at 147.