Comments Thread For: Golovkin: I'd Rather Get Saunders Next, Means More Than Canelo!

[Edward90]

Using Kell to build the fan base necessary to force the BJS fight... I like the idea... Hopefully, he makes it happen. This also reinforces the idea that he wants the belts more than anything else.... With that being said, I think if Canelo offers him the fight, he takes that over BJS. But whatever. BJS, Jacobs, Canelo, maybe Lara, or move up. Other than that (I'm probably missing someone), I won't really be moved. Hopefully these fights happen soon.

[Can'tHoldMeBack]

Well no **** you'll rather fight Saunders next after brook being as though you and your dumda$$ team have a bs verbal agreement for next September and if you want that belt Saunders have stop being cheap and pay him what he wants or continue chasing that belt

[Can'tHoldMeBack]

He's just saying this because he already tried to make Canelo FIRST, before Saunders, but Canelo ducked. Now that he knows Canelo doesn't want it, he's basically saying **** Canelo, he doesn't have the belt anyway, I'll just go with Saunders.

Personally I'd rather see Jacobs next than Saunders but I expect Jacobs to keep ducking too.

Saunders also said *** GGG or did you forget? I also know you saw article of saying GGG didn't want Jacobs next which came from WBA prez mouth, not to mention he is also the mando, come on Kim

[BitPlayer]

I agree, boxing needs an undisputed champion, but there is no need to underestimate Brook.

Surely he needs to beat both to be undisputed, Canelo still is the lineal champ and holds The Ring belt.

[hugh grant]

I thought GGG was taking brook seriously but evidently not quite.

[Metho_4u]

Using Kell to build the fan base necessary to force the BJS fight... I like the idea... Hopefully, he makes it happen. This also reinforces the idea that he wants the belts more than anything else.... With that being said, I think if Canelo offers him the fight, he takes that over BJS. But whatever. BJS, Jacobs, Canelo, maybe Lara, or move up. Other than that (I'm probably missing someone), I won't really be moved. Hopefully these fights happen soon.

Well no **** he'd fight Canelo firsr, that's where the money's at. Of course they could keep lowballing Saunders and then lie about some more

[yngwie]

Surely he needs to beat both to be undisputed, Canelo still is the lineal champ and holds The Ring belt.

Canelo vacated the title, the fight is more a fight about legacy than titles, it's a big fight for boxing.
Also, Canelo won the title in a catweight fight against Cotto who won it in a catchweight fight himself, so the "lineal title" of Canelo doesn't have much worth really.

[OctoberRed]

GGG is already getting used to that UK money

[bluemax]

Canelo no longer deserves a shot

Canelo had his shot and chose to vacate his belt instead of having to face Golovkin. Think about it! He dumped his title so he wouldn't have to face Golovkin!! Enough said, Canelo chose flight over fight which clearly proves he knew and more importantly his team knew that he had little chance of winning that fight. Saunders holds the WBO belt now so Golovkin should try and make that fight, as for Canelo he's perfectly happy fighting blown up or washed up welterweights and just TALK tough. All this talk about Canelo yet when we had one real test against Mayweather he couldn't win a round and I'm convinced he only took that fight because of Mayweathers lack of punching power and him being the bigger, younger guy yet he lost almost every round anyway.

[-Freddy-]

There's two credible fights for him in the UK. BJS and Eubank.

BJS is on a loooong vacation and Eubank well we saw what happened with Eubank.