If Brook beats Golovkin - On par with SRL vs Hagler / Turpin vs SRR?

[Earl-Hickey]

All that it means if brook wins is ggg was pure hype and that's why his resume is so bad

[Robbie Barrett]

Sanchez: GGG not doing media to give Brook his moment

http://www.skysports.com/watch/video/sports/boxing/10571170/sanchez-golovkin-not-feeling-the-pressure

This is so ******. There's something wrong with GGG.

What a load of crap. They'd pull out if there was anything wrong with him, it's not like he's earning 100 mil now is it?

[LacedUp]

What a load of crap. They'd pull out if there was anything wrong with him, it's not like he's earning 100 mil now is it?

Haha sure they would

[hugh grant]

Srl v hacker weren't even that big upset come to think of it. Srl was so good in first place anyway that that fight was bordering on even. Same with brook, brook ius very good even drained

Biggest upset must be Tyson v buster Douglas, but they were same size guys. So its hard to say

[Weltschmerz]

Srl v hacker weren't even that big upset come to think of it. Srl was so good in first place anyway that that fight was bordering on even. Same with brook, brook ius very good even drained

Biggest upset must be Tyson v buster Douglas, but they were same size guys. So its hard to say

Not really... just sayin

[Weltschmerz]

Sanchez: GGG not doing media to give Brook his moment

http://www.skysports.com/watch/video/sports/boxing/10571170/sanchez-golovkin-not-feeling-the-pressure

This is so ******. There's something wrong with GGG.

Holy **** then we won't be able to give Brook credit should he make history tonight.

[MDPopescu]

If Brook beats Golovkin - On par with SRL vs Hagler / Turpin vs SRR?
(...)

So how legendary would this be?

I usually don't compare fighters from the present era to those who use to fight 15 rounds for a belt and had the same day weigh-in.

[Lords]

It would just expose the *** out of GGG for being overrated. He has yet to fight a legit real challenge, so he is still unproven at the highest level.

[hugh grant]

It would just expose the *** out of GGG for being overrated. He has yet to fight a legit real challenge, so he is still unproven at the highest level.

Well, brook is beating a PFP top 5 guy in GGG. So GGG is proven even if he didnt get in ring to prove it, ie nelo , ducked him citing not ready for such a test. GGG can't be penalised for opponents not being ready, but in actusal fact must be compensated. Which GGG is with top 5 PFP ratuing.
Brook will be better than people thought.
Someone must gain something from this fight.

[Lords]

Well, brook is beating a PFP top 5 guy in GGG. So GGG is proven even if he didnt get in ring to prove it, ie nelo , ducked him citing not ready for such a test. GGG can't be penalised for opponents not being ready, but in actusal fact must be compensated. Which GGG is with top 5 PFP ratuing.
Brook will be better than people thought.
Someone must gain something from this fight.

The thing is, just because people duck a fighter doesn't mean that fight belongs in the top 5 P4P. Lara called him out, Ward, he could have moved up, etc.. We've all heard this plenty of times, no need to repeat it.