Everyone Wants to Talk About Floyd's IV - What About Pac-Monster's Toradol Abuse???

[ADP02]

Oh look what I found:
NSAC executive director Bob Bennett said: “Mr. Mayweather has done nothing wrong. The Nevada State Athletic Commission has no interest in any type of investigation regarding his IV. He did not violate the WADA Prohibited List for any type of drugs that are prohibited on that list, and we have no interest in it whatsoever.”

Now was he manipulating his blood with chemicals or treating dehydration with IV fluid, THE SAME AS DE LA HOYA DID.

Eat a ****, biotch.

There is that word again ... "wrong".


Sorry but the NSAC wants to be notified of any serious medical condition that you have but Floyd did not. Your statement proves that the NSAC acts differently depending who you are. With Manny, they were going to investigate even though the NSAC was aware just before the fight and Manny did not get to use the substance.

Floyd used an IV and did not notify the NSAC until 3 weeks after the fight. WHOOAAAA!

[travestyny]

FAIL! Nope, you are. Diaz even admits to using and to what he does to avoid being caught. Diaz, like Floyd, tried to beat the system by diluting .... which means masking the true result.


The controversy is about Diaz's ban and why he was banned. I do not think that someone should be banned from the sport for so long for this violation but that is not my point. BUT he was caught like 3 times for the same thing so you are wrong!!!

The point is that even when the urine sample was below the threshold (sg test), the WADA approved LAB couldn't come up with a positive result. As you, Diaz and everyone knows, Diaz does use the substance and just by checking out the sq results, you know what Diaz was trying to do. Diaz was trying to dilute his urine sample so that he would not have a positive result.


If you cannot even admit to this then there is no hope for you. You do not even have to say that you are wroooooong .....

I guess there is no hope for these guys. What do you think, bro?

The most accredited doctor (who analyzes for criminal/court testing) stated that this shouldn't even be questioned, but treated as a negative result.

An expert witness provided by Diaz's defense expressed doubt as to the validity of the positive test, arguing that it was "not medically possible" for an individual to hydrate themselves so thoroughly within a span of less than two hours as to dilute their urine enough to cause the dramatic separation from the 10:38 p.m. results and the 11:55 p.m. negative test.

So um... what you got. MEDICALLY IMPOSSIBLE is what I got.

Lol. You are never gonna win. Give up

[travestyny]

There is that word again ... "wrong".


Sorry but the NSAC wants to be notified of any serious medical condition that you have but Floyd did not. Your statement proves that the NSAC acts differently depending who you are. With Manny, they were going to investigate even though the NSAC was aware just before the fight and Manny did not get to use the substance.

Floyd used an IV and did not notify the NSAC until 3 weeks after the fight. WHOOAAAA!

Oh I'm sorry, did Mayweather try to blame NSAC for his loss? LMAO

Maybe his team should stop lying and blaming **** on others.

By the way, did you answer my questions yet? I'll backtrack to see. I hope you did.

---edit---
What the....? You still ducking my questions? You are losing face bro. ANSWER THE DAMN QUESTIONS. STOP DUCKING!

[Shape up]

1. Why don't you learn how to consistently use the quote function so that this dialogue goes more smoothly, unless you are trying to avoid me.

2. How the hell did I back up what you just said? You said he gave diluted urine after the IV. I clearly showed you that in their rule book, he is not allowed to give diluted urine after rehydrating.

Please work on your comprehension skills, "****head."

So do you admit you were wrong and giving false information now?

Oh look what I found:
NSAC executive director Bob Bennett said: “Mr. Mayweather has done nothing wrong. The Nevada State Athletic Commission has no interest in any type of investigation regarding his IV. He did not violate the WADA Prohibited List for any type of drugs that are prohibited on that list, and we have no interest in it whatsoever.”

Now was he manipulating his blood with chemicals or treating dehydration with IV fluid, THE SAME AS DE LA HOYA DID.

Eat a ****, biotch.

Funny, Bennett also said this
"The TUE for Mayweather's IV -- and the IV was administered at Floyd's house, not in a medical facility, and wasn't brought to our attention at the time -- was totally unacceptable," Bennett is quoted as saying in the report. "I've made it clear to [USADA CEO] Travis Tygart that this should not happen again. We have the sole authority to grant any and all TUEs in the state of Nevada. USADA is a drug-testing agency. USADA should not be granting waivers and exemptions. Not in this state. We are less than pleased that USADA acted the way it did."---------- SOLE AUTHORITY, do you understand what that means NOBJOCKEY

[Shape up]

And it doesn't matter what floyd and pacquaio write into the contract, NSAC rules overrule their contract, so manipulating blood with an IV is banned and floyd diluted his blood thereby actually cheating ****head

[ADP02]

FAIL! Nope, you are. Diaz even admits to using and to what he does to avoid being caught. Diaz, like Floyd, tried to beat the system by diluting .... which means masking the true result.


The controversy is about Diaz's ban and why he was banned. I do not think that someone should be banned from the sport for so long for this violation but that is not my point. BUT he was caught like 3 times for the same thing so you are wrong!!!

The point is that even when the urine sample was below the threshold (sg test), the WADA approved LAB couldn't come up with a positive result. As you, Diaz and everyone knows, Diaz does use the substance and just by checking out the sq results, you know what Diaz was trying to do. Diaz was trying to dilute his urine sample so that he would not have a positive result.


If you cannot even admit to this then there is no hope for you. You do not even have to say that you are wroooooong .....

I guess there is no hope for these guys. What do you think, bro?

The most accredited doctor (who analyzes for criminal/court testing) stated that this shouldn't even be questioned, but treated as a negative result.

An expert witness provided by Diaz's defense expressed doubt as to the validity of the positive test, arguing that it was "not medically possible" for an individual to hydrate themselves so thoroughly within a span of less than two hours as to dilute their urine enough to cause the dramatic separation from the 10:38 p.m. results and the 11:55 p.m. negative test.

So um... what you got. MEDICALLY IMPOSSIBLE is what I got.

Lol. You are never gonna win. Give up

If you cannot even admit to this, YOU LOST ALL CREDIBILITY


Even the Fonze, who couldn't say WRONG, admitted that he was not correct!


Put it to you this way, what was the final verdict by NSAC? The Commission that you cannot seem to go against .... but now, you are wavering!

This is great. If you cannot admit that you are WRONG then that means that you cannot trust the NSAC and their methods. Either way, there is a problem here!


Its sad because this was an easy one for us to agree but you just couldn't. AGAIN, the sg results speak for themselves. SG results show that Diaz was trying to dilute his urine samples. Even Dosumptin said a few posts back that is in violation but I'm sure that he will quickly spin .....

Floyd and his fans deserve each other! GOOD LUCK!

[ADP02]

Oh I'm sorry, did Mayweather try to blame NSAC for his loss? LMAO

Maybe his team should stop lying and blaming **** on others.

By the way, did you answer my questions yet? I'll backtrack to see. I hope you did.

---edit---
What the....? You still ducking my questions? You are losing face bro. ANSWER THE DAMN QUESTIONS. STOP DUCKING!

Are we talking about the rules or your speculation?

IF you have a medical condition you need to notify the NSAC about it BEFORE the start of the fight.


Floyd did not notify the NSAC until 3 weeks AFTER the fight.

BOOM!

[travestyny]

If you cannot even admit to this, YOU LOST ALL CREDIBILITY


Even the Fonze, who couldn't say WRONG, admitted that he was not correct!


Put it to you this way, what was the final verdict by NSAC? The Commission that you cannot seem to go against .... but now, you are wavering!

This is great. If you cannot admit that you are WRONG then that means that you cannot trust the NSAC and their methods. Either way, there is a problem here!


Its sad because this was an easy one for us to agree but you just couldn't. AGAIN, the sg results speak for themselves. SG results show that Diaz was trying to dilute his urine samples. Even Dosumptin said a few posts back that is in violation but I'm sure that he will quickly spin .....

Floyd and his fans deserve each other! GOOD LUCK!

This is not rocket science...well, maybe for you it is.


Let's see. Who would you believe in this situation?

1. AN accredited WADA lab which followed protocol perfectly

2. An unaccredited lab that did not follow protocol:
A. did not have the athlete seal the container but rather had their DCO seal it
B. did not leave the athlete's name off of the container so that it was known who the sample was from
C. Takes less urine than accredited labs, which is known to make findings less accurate
D. Found marijuana ten times higher than the accredited lab.

You also have the fishy business of:
1. NSAC testing Diaz three times in one night, and deciding to use different labs for some reason, as if WADA accredited labs can't test for marijuana.

2. NSAC going after a lifetime ban on Nick Diaz.


There were 3 tests. 2 are consistent. One is way different. The one that is different was from an unaccredited lab that admit that they didn't follow protocol for sealing the containers and didn't follow protocol for keeping the donor anonymous.

And this is your proof that specific gravity tests don't work? Really?



You're far more ****** than I ever thought.

[travestyny]

Are we talking about the rules or your speculation?

IF you have a medical condition you need to notify the NSAC about it BEFORE the start of the fight.


Floyd did not notify the NSAC until 3 weeks AFTER the fight.

BOOM!

Tell me, has a boxer ever, EVER declared dehydration to a commission. EVER????? Just find me one!!!! Please, find just one, because I'm assuming no fighter ever feels dehydrated after their weigh in. FIND ME ONE!

[travestyny]

Funny, Bennett also said this
"The TUE for Mayweather's IV -- and the IV was administered at Floyd's house, not in a medical facility, and wasn't brought to our attention at the time -- was totally unacceptable," Bennett is quoted as saying in the report. "I've made it clear to [USADA CEO] Travis Tygart that this should not happen again. We have the sole authority to grant any and all TUEs in the state of Nevada. USADA is a drug-testing agency. USADA should not be granting waivers and exemptions. Not in this state. We are less than pleased that USADA acted the way it did."---------- SOLE AUTHORITY, do you understand what that means NOBJOCKEY

And it doesn't matter what floyd and pacquaio write into the contract, NSAC rules overrule their contract, so manipulating blood with an IV is banned and floyd diluted his blood thereby actually cheating ****head

Funny, Bennet also said Mayweather did nothing wrong. Just because they had beef with USADA doesn't mean there was any cheating going on. You've been shut down left and right and all you have to fall back on is an old beef between USADA and NSAC.

What do they have in common?

BOTH SAY MAYWEATHER DID NOTHING WRONG.

Now shut the **** up and go cry elsewhere, bltch.