I wasn't the one who got humiliated on every point and made to bow down like a bltch. That would be you.
And I dare you to deny it, so I can repost your failures and laugh as you refuse to respond to them for a third time.
Sorry son. It's over for you.
It may appear that way from your deluded point of view. Here's some much needed advice, the next time you attempt to vindicate Floyd's name by drawing similarities, try not to use a known ******* and PED user as an example.
Reply with quote
Link
12 Nov 2012 22:46 Hypothesized Masking Strategies for Testosterone Doping to Beat the Carbon Isotope Ratio (CIR) Test
Summary
You base your diet around foods known to have low C13/C12 ratios, missing out foods with high C13/C12 ratios (to match your diet to the low C13/C12 ratio of artificial Testosterone, which is generally made from soy). Thus the C13/C12 ratio of your endogenously produced reference chemicals will match that of the T (& E) you are taking, and you should pass the CIR test. (Alternatively, maybe you could source artificial T with a high C13/C12 ratio from an underground chemist, and maintain your current diet.) Examples of foodstuffs listed later - possible to have a balanced diet suitable for elite performance.
Is this practical, and is it worth the hassle? Is it of concern to WADA that it is (presumably?) simple to mask artificial T in the CIR test? If so, have they considered developing tests of Testosterone isomer ratios (appears that they do vary in artificial T c.f. natural T), which could not be circumvented in this way?
Background Info
WADA etc. use the Testoterone(T)/Epitestosterone(E) ratio as a screening test for possible doping. If T/E>4, then a CIR test is performed to find out if excess T is artificial/natural. I think that the CIR test must be positive for a positive doping violation to be given (but only needs to be done on one out of the A & B samples). The CIR test is not generally performed (?) unless T/E>4 as it is time-consuming & expensive. -------------- plenty of info out there ****HEAD
Ahahahahaha. Stop owning yourself. The man said CIR testing was needed and got butt hurt like you when the CIR testing was done. Of course he said he was still su****ious because he had to eat crow like your dumb ass.
It may appear that way from your deluded point of view. Here's some much needed advice, the next time you attempt to vindicate Floyd's name by drawing similarities, try not to use a known ******* and PED user as an example.
The next time you step to me, try to use your brain! You got humiliated.
You gonna cry about it forever?
Why not try explaining how CIR testing looks for ******* .
Man, they actually own themselves. I just point out to them how moronic they are.
I'm enjoying it very much. Their. Blind love for Manny, is hilarious. You can't make this crap up. They are silly, and can't stand it that God didn't deliver Floyd into PAC's hands.
The next time you step to me, try to use your brain! You got humiliated.
You gonna cry about it forever?
Why not try explaining how CIR testing looks for ******* .
CIR testing isn't used to detect recreational drugs, genius. That's why it failed to link Jon Jones' low T:E ratios to ******* use; which was later discovered to be the cause. You clearly misinterpreted my comment and demonstrated once again how poor your reading comprehension is.
CIR testing isn't used to detect recreational drugs, genius. That's why it failed to link Jon Jones' low T:E ratios to ******* use; which was later discovered to be the cause. You clearly misinterpreted my comment and demonstrated once again how poor your reading comprehension is.
LMAO. I didn't misinterpret shlt. You said it "failed" to link his ratio to ******* you damn clown.
Next time, try not to discuss shlt you don't know anything about.
LMAO. I didn't misinterpret shlt. You said it "failed" to link his ratio to ******* you damn clown.
Next time, try not to discuss shlt you don't know anything about.
Speaking of things I don't know about, what on earth compelled you to draw similarities between Floyd's low T:E ratios and the T:E ratios of a known *******/PED user? I was under the impression that you were defending Floyd, not creating an even bigger cloud of su****ion around him.
Speaking of things I don't know about, what on earth compelled you to draw similarities between Floyd's low T:E ratios and the T:E ratios of a known *******/PED user? I was under the impression that you were defending Floyd, not creating an even bigger cloud of su****ion around him.
Well you know, if that bothers you, how about we compare him to Daniel Cormier who had T/E ratios in the .4 range, I believe. Lower than Floyd's. He also was CIR tested. No adverse findings. Not even *******.
Comment