Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Everyone Wants to Talk About Floyd's IV - What About Pac-Monster's Toradol Abuse???

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • By the way, I've never needed an IV for a hangover, I drink water, I don't even know anyone who needed an IV after a good drinking session

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Shape up View Post
      Floyd said his urine was brown, hardly severe hydration, it does depend on your physical condition and floyd seemed fine, why do you think in floyds last couple of fight he announced his opponent so, so late, making the testing time so,so short, also if he needed an IV after the weigh in, how many training sessions did he have an IV afterwards, you have to ask the question, really, if it wasn't for hauler doing his investigation, no one would have found out about all of this, all parties were under a confidentiality agreement
      He said his urine was extremely dark.

      Ok, he seemed fine to you. What's your point. Once again, the TUE application was reviewed by an independent panel of at least 3 doctors who did not have a name connected with the application, and it was approved. The application was also sent to WADA along with the reasons it was approved.

      If he was using PED's before the testing started, why the hell would he need an IV the day before the fight. Wouldn't the point be to complete it before testing starts? You guys make up so much bullshlt and none of it makes any sense.

      Also, the contract allowed for the tue to be revealed. So no, it's not like Hauser went snooping and found anything. You give him too much credit for really just embarrassing himself. Just stop already, dude.

      Comment


      • Doesn't matter if the TUE went to WADA numbskull, the governing body wasn't a signatory so WADA has no authority, thought you knew your stuff, obviously not, all of this crap that floyd has done is a smoke screen to make him look good, manipulate people into thinking he is a clean athlete, as I wrote before none of this would have seen the light if not for hauser, Olympic style testing he calls it, I'd call it TUEs on demand

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Shape up View Post
          Doesn't matter if the TUE went to WADA numbskull, the governing body wasn't a signatory so WADA has no authority, thought you knew your stuff, obviously not, all of this crap that floyd has done is a smoke screen to make him look good, manipulate people into thinking he is a clean athlete, as I wrote before none of this would have seen the light if not for hauser, Olympic style testing he calls it, I'd call it TUEs on demand
          You do realize that USADA is a signatory to WADA right? You need to learn your stuff.

          Just give up. You were wrong about everything you've mentioned from Morales to this case. Let it go. It's boring now.

          Comment


          • That is completely WRONG again, USADA is a collection agency for WADA, the sanctioning body needs to be a signatory for WADA to have any authority, read paragraph 30 in the contract until you actually understand what it means, please don't post again until then because you make yourself look truely ******

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Shape up View Post
              That is completely WRONG again, USADA is a collection agency for WADA, the sanctioning body needs to be a signatory for WADA to have any authority, read paragraph 30 in the contract until you actually understand what it means, please don't post again until then because you make yourself look truely ******
              You idiot. USADA has to follow WADA's rules. If they don't, they would be sanctioned just like RUSADA. USADA is not allowed to just break WADA's rules, which means Floyd had to stay in compliance with WADA.

              Once again, the reason that the Morales fight went forward was because NYSAC didn't have to follow WADA. Still, Morales failed the drug tests as per WADA's rules. NYSAC was free to do with that information whatever it liked. If Floyd failed to pass the tests AS PER WADA'S RULES, then NSAC could do what they want with that information.

              Floyd passed 19 drug tests, and if there was a failed test, it would immediately be sent to WADA and the commission as well as Pac's team would be notified. So how in your simple head does that mean he didn't have to comply with WADA?


              Do you understand now? I'm tired of talking to you. You are either 12 years old, an idiot, or both.
              Last edited by travestyny; 10-09-2016, 12:42 AM.

              Comment


              • Sanctioning body and nsac are not signatories, ******, if nsac was a signatory, they have to comply with WADA, remember that the nsac said IVs aren't against THEIR rules, that's why usada said that floyd didn't have to get a TUE from NSAC, your so dumb

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Shape up View Post
                  Sanctioning body and nsac are not signatories, ******, if nsac was a signatory, they have to comply with WADA, remember that the nsac said IVs aren't against THEIR rules, that's why usada said that floyd didn't have to get a TUE from NSAC, your so dumb
                  You're too ****** to even realize what you are saying.

                  Question: Did Floyd have to comply with the WADA code? Yes or no?

                  Comment


                  • Yes and no, in the contract they said they abide by WADA rules, but twice in the contract they wrote in a get out of jail clause, under RULES (4) last 2 sentences "these provisions shall only apply to the extent they do not conflict with the terms of this agreement. This provision shall survive termination of this agreement" and once again in paragraph 30. "CONFLICT (30) if any rule or regulation whatsoever incorporated or referenced herein conflicts in any respect with the terms of this agreement, this agreement shall in all such respects control, such rules and regulations include, but are not limited to, the code, the usada protocol, the WADA prohibited list, the ISTUE, and the ISTI, nothing in this provision should be construed to permit a party to engage in any unlawful act pursuant to this agreement"----------- so really no, they didn't have to follow wada

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by stuff jones View Post
                      You're right. Manny is white.

                      And people dislike Floyd only because he's black. Not because he beats up women including in front of their kid. Not because he says ****** **** all the time. Not because he rubs his wealth in people's faces but doesn't understand why he should donate to Africa. Not because he's boring as **** in the ring.

                      It's all racist. Everything is racist. Everything that has ever happened bad in your life is because of race. If you weren't black you'd probably be a billionaire by now and rule the world. Pity.
                      You went all in.

                      You nailed it.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP