Even the WADA committee presented the issues that can arise with the process including what you stated. When an ADO always selects a certain LAB, the "independent" becomes less "independent" and actually it can be "dependent" and a cause for concern. Again, not my words. Just like in the case with Russia and other scandals. There is often a link between the so called independent groups.
Now we are talking about Floyd and his links with USADA. So that is why you can throw that "independent" doctors out of the window.
WADA review is optional and that was more than likely the case. Even then, what would they be reviewing? If USADA met the WADA protocol at minimum, there is nothing that WADA would say or do because Floyd would not have given them documents with a bunch of holes. As long as there is no investigation WADA would be blind to what was going on. So stop it with your nonsense! I already told you this and you continue to play the ignorant card!!!
Riiiight. So what you're saying is to help Floyd cheat, USADA brought his actions up for review by the TUEC and uploaded the relevant documents to WADA's database for them to review anytime they want.
Yea, that's so smart for USADA to do. I mean, why just warn Floyd when the test was coming when you can help him cheat, reveal his cheating to at least 3 doctors and ask them to place their livelihood on the line, then upload false documents to WADA to cause a huge scandal when WADA potentially finds out its all bullshlt which would cause your organization to become defunct. Yep. PERFECT!
The doctor said that Manny was injured. The meds were for pain.
Steps:
1) Take the meds
2) Train
3) Manny felt less to no pain
So there plan going into the fight was to do the same.
Again you do not understand any of this or actually do NOT want to. If I would have said that it was Floyd who wanted to use XYLOCAINE even though he felt OK going into the fight, you would have said that's different. Floyd wanted to use it because he thought it may hurt him after 7 or 8 rounds so to you, it would have been acceptable. Right?
Maybe you never played sports but you think that Manny is the first to want meds for an injury that he just got even if it felt better? That is crazy talk!
You are trying to use the "final" decision against Manny and are acting dumb? Please explain why????. The NSAC said that there is no way that Manny is going out there with the meds. NSAC had as fall-back the pre-fight form. So the ball was in Manny's court. They made a team decision and let the NSAC know that Manny is good enough to fight that night even without the meds. BUT the truth is that they had NO CHOICE!!! You got it? I doubt it!
If they say that Manny was not ready and willing to fight, the sh$t would have hit the fan big time and you know it.
WRONG. The doctor said he was at normal strength and didn't need the shots. This is a fact.
So again, If he was at normal strength, wouldn't having a shot of toradol put him in an abnormal state? Wouldn't that be cheating?
Still waiting. Stop dancing around with bullishlt, though it's fun skimming thru your squirming messages.
Wrong. Her statement came after his positive ******* results. Second, that is completely irrelevant to whether he was taking testosterone, ******. Thanks for embarrassing yourself yet again.
Resorting to name calling like a child are we? The article was published two days after Jon Jones' positive drug test result, but oddly enough, at no point was it ever mentioned. For such an obvious truth to go unaddressed clearly indicates that the author had no prior knowledge of Jon Jones' use of ******* at the time the article was being written.
Some reports suggest that administration of IV infusions, including dietary supplement and vitamin ****tails, are being provided to athletes for recuperation, recovery or lifestyle reasons. This medical practice is prohibited at all times without prior TUE approval. WADA has justified the inclusion of IV infusions on the Prohibited List given the intent of some athletes to manipulate their plasma volume levels in order to mask the use of a prohibited substance and/or to distort the values in the Athlete Biological Passport. Further, it must be clearly stated that the use of IV fluid replacement following exercise to correct mild rehydration or help speed recovery is not clinically indicated nor substantiated by the medical literature. There is a well-established body of scientific opinion to confirm that oral rehydration is the preferred the****utic choice. Legitimate medical indications for IV infusions are well documented and are most commonly associated with medical emergencies (emergency TUE), in-patient care, surgery, or clinical investigations for diagnostic purposes.---------------------- WADA rules on IV, notice it say the word PRIOR before TUE, they must have had a time machine. So at the end of the day a retro TUE doesn't cut it
Last edited by Shape up; 10-11-2016, 02:32 AM.
Reason: Add more
Resorting to name calling like a child are we? The article was published two days after Jon Jones' positive drug test result, but oddly enough, at no point was it ever mentioned. For such an obvious truth to go unaddressed clearly indicates that the author had no prior knowledge of Jon Jones' use of ******* at the time the article was being written.
You still here embarrassing yourself?
1. The results of Jones' tests were made public Jan. 6th. Christine Ayotte was commenting on Conte's statements that were made on Jan. 7th and 8th. So you think she didn't know? That's your 1st **** up.
2. Stop deflecting. This has nothing to do with *******. You tried to say the low T/E level indicates PED use. Well after Jon Jones lower T/E ratio, the samples were CIR tested. Like Ayotte said, normal because it came back CLEAN for PED use.
So yes, you are a moron, and I'll continue to prove it over and over based on facts. Ready to run away yet?
Comment