Everyone Wants to Talk About Floyd's IV - What About Pac-Monster's Toradol Abuse???

[travestyny]

That's here say stupid, that's not proof, the commission said they weren't contacted, that's here say as well, usada has a burden of liability to confirm in writing, show me where they did that before the fight, that would be proof, Schaefer and golden boy had a vested interest due to the money they would lose on the fight, you really are one of the most ignorant imbecile posters I've ever come across

1. The term you are looking for is "hearsay." Please educate yourself before calling anyone an imbecile.

2. It isn't hearsay nor "heresay." Sports illustrated also reported on this conversation by Schaeffer. How the hell could this article be released before the fight took place, but you believe that the NYSAC was never notified? That's idiotic. USADA name dropped Melvina Lathan who never denied this. Hmmm.

You're saying that Richard Schaeffer was part of a plot to hide the positive test from the commission because he wanted money.......YET HE PUT OUT QUOTES TO THE MEDIA BEFORE THE FIGHT SAYING THAT MORALES TESTED POSITIVE!

AHAHAHAHAHAH. LOGGGG OFFFFFFF!!!!

[Dosumpthin]

http://www.fightsaga.com/news/item/4...her-Alex-Ariza

You really posting VADA advertisements by Victor Conte?

Lol.

Video has been debunked. All samples from MAY VS PAC were CIR tested.

You failed.

[Dosumpthin]

1. The term you are looking for is "hearsay." Please educate yourself before calling anyone an imbecile.

2. It isn't hearsay nor "heresay." Sports illustrated also reported on this conversation by Schaeffer. How the hell could this article be released before the fight took place, but you believe that the NYSAC was never notified? That's idiotic. USADA name dropped Melvina Lathan who never denied this. Hmmm.

You're saying that Richard Schaeffer was part of a plot to hide the positive test from the commission because he wanted money.......YET HE PUT OUT QUOTES TO THE MEDIA BEFORE THE FIGHT SAYING THAT MORALES TESTED POSITIVE!

AHAHAHAHAHAH. LOGGGG OFFFFFFF!!!!

Facts VS rumors. Facts win again.


Pact@rds stay losing.

[Shape up]

It doesn't matter whether sports illustrated or Donald trump reported it, it still came from Schaefer, it's not proof dickhead, did he put out to the media that he failed both A and B samples twice?, NOOOOOO

[travestyny]

It doesn't matter whether sports illustrated or Donald trump reported it, it still came from Schaefer, it's not proof dickhead

It came from Schaefer BEFORE the fight took place, clown. Why the hell would he try to hide the positive test.......by revealing it to the media?


Just give up. You make no sense.

[Zaroku]

Trevestyny putting in that work.

He's taking them to school. Highly entertaining.

[Shape up]

You didn't answer the question, did Schaefer tell the media that morales failed an A and B sample twice on the 3rd and the 10th before the fight or did he say that morales failed his A sample but the results won't be back for the B sample before the fight date, which one did he tell the media

[travestyny]

You didn't answer the question, did Schaefer tell the media that morales failed an A and B sample twice on the 3rd and the 10th before the fight or did he say that morales failed his A sample but the results won't be back for the B sample before the fight date, which one did he tell the media

Dude, this information is out there. Just give up.

The point is you were wrong, and I've proved you were wrong. The commission was notified BEFORE the fight. Schaefer put out the statement about the A sample before the fight occurred. Ultimately, it is the commission's decision on what to do with the information, and the commission decided that there wasn't enough time to review all of the information, so they went ahead with the fight. This can be verified by Melvina Lathan's statement:

“The commission believes that competition testing for P.E.D.s and doping (such as the type performed by USADA – U.S. Anti-Doping Agency and WADA – World Anti-Doping Agency) is beneficial to curtail illicit athlete doping. While the commission isn’t a party to the contracts between the boxers and USADA/WADA, it is our understanding that these organizations are committed to sharing any adverse findings with us when the results are available. When confirmed doping results are presented to us, it is our policy to review for appropriate action which may include: denial of licensure (thereby preventing the match from occurring), suspension, revocation, imposition of fines and/or forfeiture of a purse. It’s important to note that before seeking to impose any sanctions, NYSAC carefully reviews the available data and information before issuing an appropriate response.”

As for the B sample:

Fully understanding the urgency of the situation, USADA scheduled the B sample opening for October 18, 2012, the earliest possible date the analysis could occur after notification was made to Mr. Morales regarding the A sample positive on October 17, 2012.

Ultimately, upon a request by USADA to make the analysis and processing of the samples a top priority, the laboratory was able to report the B sample confirmation results on the evening of October 18 and turn around preliminary A sample findings for the October 10 and October 16 samples on October 19, 2012. All of the results were immediately communicated to the athletes, promoter and NYSAC.


Now admit that you were wrong and shut the hell up.

[LoadedWraps]

Dude, this information is out there. Just give up.

The point is you were wrong, and I've proved you were wrong. The commission was notified BEFORE the fight. Schaefer put out the statement about the A sample before the fight occurred. Ultimately, it is the commission's decision on what to do with the information, and the commission decided that there wasn't enough time to review all of the information, so they went ahead with the fight. This can be verified by Melvina Lathan's statement:

“The commission believes that competition testing for P.E.D.s and doping (such as the type performed by USADA – U.S. Anti-Doping Agency and WADA – World Anti-Doping Agency) is beneficial to curtail illicit athlete doping. While the commission isn’t a party to the contracts between the boxers and USADA/WADA, it is our understanding that these organizations are committed to sharing any adverse findings with us when the results are available. When confirmed doping results are presented to us, it is our policy to review for appropriate action which may include: denial of licensure (thereby preventing the match from occurring), suspension, revocation, imposition of fines and/or forfeiture of a purse. It’s important to note that before seeking to impose any sanctions, NYSAC carefully reviews the available data and information before issuing an appropriate response.”

As for the B sample:

Fully understanding the urgency of the situation, USADA scheduled the B sample opening for October 18, 2012, the earliest possible date the analysis could occur after notification was made to Mr. Morales regarding the A sample positive on October 17, 2012.

Ultimately, upon a request by USADA to make the analysis and processing of the samples a top priority, the laboratory was able to report the B sample confirmation results on the evening of October 18 and turn around preliminary A sample findings for the October 10 and October 16 samples on October 19, 2012. All of the results were immediately communicated to the athletes, promoter and NYSAC.


Now admit that you were wrong and shut the hell up.

[Lester Tutor]

http://www.fightsaga.com/news/item/4...her-Alex-Ariza

If we were lawyers you'd get owned before a grand jury. In one video, you've got Conte being suspicious on what Floyd is doing "off season" which can be applied to any boxer including Pac who's not enrolled in 365... that's the video you posted.

The video I posted clearly shows Conte admitting that he has no doubt that Pac has been roiding in the states and in the Philippines...

And then, to top it off, you post an article with Ariza... Ariza who's synonymous with Pac..

Lol