Originally posted by ADP02
View Post
Here's the thing. You're not going to get what I'm saying to you unless some other people come on board to tell you that you are wrong. This is why I asked you to go to the Thunderdome or make a new thread. You refuse. My hunch is that you refuse because deep down you know you are wrong. I don't know why you want to continue bickering about this thing. I can type to you until my fingers fall off about why you are wrong, and you still won't get it. I'll try again...hopefully for the last time.
Originally posted by ADP02
View Post
Originally posted by ADP02
View Post
Originally posted by ADP02
View Post
Originally posted by ADP02
View Post
Originally posted by ADP02
View Post
That's right. We have a labcorp test which was his voluntary test to make sure that he would pass:
1/26/15
creatinine: 240.1mg/dl Very Concentrated
<50ng/ml
Then we have the QUEST test:
1/31/15
Creatinine 168.4mg/dl
733.23ng/ml
No apples and oranges here, so this should make you happy. Can you explain? He was less diluted for the 1/26 test, yet he was found to have less than 50ng of marijuana. Five days later he passed two tests lower than 70ng, and somehow failed Quest's test with a whopping 733.23ng (or certainly well above 300ng). How does this make sense to you? Was he dumb enough to voluntarily test himself, find out that he was below the limit, apply for reinstatement, get it, and then smoke again right before the test? IT MAKES NO SENSE! The 1/30 test was more diluted than the 1/26 test, yet the marijuana level is 14 times higher!!! I dare you to attempt to reconcile this. Please answer how this makes sense to you without ducking. Thanks.
Originally posted by ADP02
View Post
Originally posted by ADP02
View Post
A. The podcast from your referee says that Diaz needed to drink 2-4 liters of water.
B. The study that you showed claimed that drinking 1 liter of water puts the subject at a specific gravity of 1.003. So accordingly, he drank less than a liter of water, right or wrong? Can you answer?
C. The live study you provided of seven subjects who drank slightly less than 2 liters of water each had specific gravities of 1.006 or lower after drinking, and the biggest jump they made after drinking 3.79liters of water was 94ng to 8ng of marijuana metabolite with a specific gravity of 1.001. This shows his specific gravity would be lower than 1.009 had he drank 2 liters of water, and even 4 liters wouldn't be enough to do what he would have needed to do. Just as the MRO stated. Can you please address this and stop ducking it. This shows your referee/expert has no idea what he is talking about.
Originally posted by ADP02
View Post
Originally posted by ADP02
View Post
Originally posted by ADP02
View Post
Originally posted by ADP02
View Post
Originally posted by ADP02
View Post
Originally posted by ADP02
View Post
Look, Nick had TWO DCO's waiting for him directly after the fight. TWO! One from NSAC and one from SMRTL. The NSAC DCO testified that they both watched him when he left the cage. The QUEST test taken at that time was found to be slightly dehydrated, I believe they said. That means he didn't overdrink. At that point he had 1hr 17 minutes to drink it up. He drank enough to dilute well over 300ng AT THE TIME OF THE QUEST TEST to 61ng in 1hr17 minutes in front of now at least one DCO? His specific gravity was well within range of what is allowed by WADA.--1.009, and your studies show that had he drank as much as you claim he did, it would have been lower. Right or wrong? Don't your studies show that?????? Please answer.
That is why you are wrong. That is also why NSAC's decision had a lot more to do with Nick lying instead of the tests. One of the "judges" even admit that Nick's legal team did a hell of a job. Quest ****ed up twice in one day. Get over it!
Comment