Joe Louis's resume vs. Tyson Fury's resume

[TheBoxingXpert]

Who got the better resume between Tyson Fury and Joe Louis?

Fury IS undefeated and DOES have the much better win in Wladimir. But Louis got more wins than Fury and a better KO percentage.

So, who got the better resume, in your opinion?

[TheBoxingXpert]

Personally, I consider quality over quantity, so I regard Fury's resume higher.

[SugarRayCurtain]

Tyson furys, no doubt
Him beating Wlad completely ****s over Joe Louie bum of the month club any day

[boliodogs]

Fury beat a 41 year old Wlad who was many years past his prime and Fury has yet to defend his title even once. Louis won his title at a much younger age by beating a champion still in his prime. Fury won the title in one of the most boring and least action fights ever seen. There were no hard punches landed by either man. Louis won his title with one of the most vicious 1st round knockouts ever seen. Louis successfully defended his title a record 25 times and beat everyone there was to beat. Fury is already considering retirement. You might be the only boxing fan alive who thinks Fury's resume is superior to the resume of the legendary, all time great Joe Louis. Some English boxing fans overrated their country's best boxers and you are guilty of doing that to the extreme.

[j0zef]

What in the ***ing ***?

Are you a racist, is this a joke, or are you THAT dumb?

[mlac]

be a bit more discreet with your trolling son

[TheBoxingXpert]

What in the ***ing ***?

Are you a racist, is this a joke, or are you THAT dumb?

Racist? How? Ward is the best fighter in the world and before him, Mayweather was the best fighter in the world and before him, Lennox Lewis was the best fighter in the world. Black people are the best fighters.

[j0zef]

Racist? How? Ward is the best fighter in the world and before him, Mayweather was the best fighter in the world and before him, Lennox Lewis was the best fighter in the world. Black people are the best fighters.

Ok, you addressed one possibility, but the other 2 remain. Was this a bad joke or you that ******?

[TheBoxingXpert]

Fury beat a 41 year old Wlad who was many years past his prime and Fury has yet to defend his title even once. Louis won his title at a much younger age by beating a champion still in his prime. Fury won the title in one of the most boring and least action fights ever seen. There were no hard punches landed by either man. Louis won his title with one of the most vicious 1st round knockouts ever seen. Louis successfully defended his title a record 25 times and beat everyone there was to beat. Fury is already considering retirement. You might be the only boxing fan alive who thinks Fury's resume is superior to the resume of the legendary, all time great Joe Louis. Some English boxing fans overrated their country's best boxers and you are guilty of doing that to the extreme.

Louis could have knocked out 200 bums for all I care. Wilder could do the same. The question is, did he knock out 1 opponent on the same level as Wladimir?

[Ray Corso]

Tyson Fury doesn't belong in the same sentence with Joe Louis!
If you can't see the differences in the skill level of these men you need to take up watching bowling! Even that might have to much technique for you to grasp,
and by "you" I mean any one who compares a Tyson Fury to a Joe Louis.
Fury does NOTHING better than hit himself compared to Louis.
Louis will be a top five heavy for many more years and Fury along with his "best" win will be forgotten very soon!

Ray