Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Boxing would be best with 2 or 3 belts.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Good luck telling any org to go away. They're here to stay.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Adonis Creed View Post
      I remember when they stated calling WBO a major belt now they added IBO too. I'd be fine with WBC, WBA,and IBF.
      Even as a kid I didn't view wbo as legit belt. But now saying that's called trolling. 3 belts at most but I think 2 is best, like the NFC and AFC conferences.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by KillaCamNZ View Post
        Good luck telling any org to go away. They're here to stay.
        Sadly you're right

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Adonis Creed View Post
          Sadly you're right

          One time I don't want to be right

          Comment


          • #15
            How about 1 champ and 1 interim.... only when the champ is injured, then and only then

            Comment


            • #16
              true but it ain't gonna happen, you can't just ask 3 out of the 4 big ABC organizations to stop existing and there's no one common platform which could make a unified deciion that from this day let's say we only accept the IBF belt as credible and not the others. Fans and the media are more divided than that...

              also not 5 organizations but 4
              whoever mentions the IBO or the regular WBA title holders as real champions should be laughed at and not taken seriously.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by MasterPlan View Post
                UFC is just a league inside MMA. You can't compare is really. Because you have Bellator and other leagues.
                this is also very true

                UFC is basically like if in boxing let's say PBC would have ALL the best fighters n every weight classes and they would have their own belt.
                That would be similar.

                Comment


                • #18
                  I used to see this as an issue, but to be honest it's a non-issue.

                  It's only to us hardcores and the purists that care about this.

                  There are so many more steps that need to be taken in order to restore the quality and popularity of the sport before looking at making it one belt per division (which is impossible to do).

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by MasterPlan View Post
                    UFC is just a league inside MMA. You can't compare is really. Because you have Bellator and other leagues.
                    Yes, but almost every good fighter or almost any fighter in the top 10 of his division is in the ufc.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by No Tomorrow View Post
                      I used to see this as an issue, but to be honest it's a non-issue.

                      It's only to us hardcores and the purists that care about this.

                      There are so many more steps that need to be taken in order to restore the quality and popularity of the sport before looking at making it one belt per division (which is impossible to do).

                      What are the real issues? Imo it would fix alot of the problems we have now.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP