Comments Thread For: WBA Declines To Sanction Golovkin-Brook Middleweight Bout

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CaneloMaidana
    Banned
    • Apr 2013
    • 4430
    • 145
    • 1
    • 4,915

    #71
    Originally posted by Isaac Clarke
    The article says it was decided September 1st.
    Damn he got caught lying.

    Comment

    • kafkod
      I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2013
      • 24817
      • 2,192
      • 1,809
      • 405,373

      #72
      Originally posted by CaneloMaidana
      The WBA asked Golovkin if he wanted Jacobs ordered, they said no.
      That was because he thought he was fighting Canelo this Sept.

      After he fights Mora there will be no more wriggle room for Jacobs. He either fights GGG or vacates the WBA regular title.

      Comment

      • just the facts
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jan 2014
        • 13788
        • 2,436
        • 1,021
        • 88,113

        #73
        Originally posted by bigdramashow
        the same old names on here, celebrating as if theyve won the lottery. Hopefully this news makes you all happy! Been a good day for you all now.
        While I'm one of g strings biggest critics, everyone has it all wrong here. The WBA isn't refusing to sanction this fight because it's a mismatch. They're refusing to sanction this fight because team g string didn't follow procedure. I can't believe they would sanction the garbage he's fought so far and not sanction a fight with Brook.

        Comment

        • Larry the boss
          EDUCATED
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jan 2011
          • 90798
          • 6,419
          • 4,473
          • 2,500,480

          #74
          Originally posted by Isaac Clarke
          Oh really which title will he be defending for the 16th time against Brook?

          The record is for consecutive defences of a MW title. That is now over for Golovkin.
          not true at all man..

          Comment

          • Robbie Barrett
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Nov 2013
            • 40891
            • 2,779
            • 667
            • 570,921

            #75
            Originally posted by kafkod
            What fucking muppets you guys are!

            I don't need to look up the definition of consecutive. I know what it means.

            And no, Golovkin will not be having a break in his run of WBA title defences.

            He defended the WBA title for the 16th time against Wade. His next defence after fighting Brook will be his 17th consecutive defence of that same title.
            Not defending his title consecutively = defending his title consecutively?

            He's having a MW fight without his MW WBA title on the line. That means he's not defending it consecutively.

            Comment

            • CaneloMaidana
              Banned
              • Apr 2013
              • 4430
              • 145
              • 1
              • 4,915

              #76
              Originally posted by kafkod
              That was because he thought he was fighting Canelo this Sept.

              After he fights Mora there will be no more wriggle room for Jacobs. He either fights GGG or vacates the WBA regular title.
              No, Haymon will win the purse bid and Golovkin will duck.

              Comment

              • _Maxi
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Feb 2015
                • 8978
                • 509
                • 718
                • 91,740

                #77
                Originally posted by Isaac Clarke
                The article says it was decided September 1st.
                Originally posted by CaneloMaidana
                So? I literally had never seen it. Your hero is a coward.
                What a bunch of assh0les.

                From july, one month and a half ago: http://www.boxingscene.com/golovkin-...-fight--106710

                Originally posted by CaneloMaidana
                Damn he got caught lying.
                You were saying?? ahh ok...
                Last edited by _Maxi; 09-02-2016, 12:10 PM.

                Comment

                • kafkod
                  I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Sep 2013
                  • 24817
                  • 2,192
                  • 1,809
                  • 405,373

                  #78
                  Originally posted by Isaac Clarke
                  Not defending his title consecutively = defending his title consecutively?

                  He's having a MW fight without his MW WBA title on the line. That means he's not defending it consecutively.
                  Bwahahaha!!

                  Comment

                  • CaneloMaidana
                    Banned
                    • Apr 2013
                    • 4430
                    • 145
                    • 1
                    • 4,915

                    #79
                    Originally posted by _Maxi
                    What a bunch of assh0les.

                    From july, one month and a half ago: http://www.boxingscene.com/golovkin-...-fight--106710
                    Who cares you coward? It's new to most people.

                    Comment

                    • Robbie Barrett
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Nov 2013
                      • 40891
                      • 2,779
                      • 667
                      • 570,921

                      #80
                      Originally posted by _Maxi
                      What a bunch of assh0les.

                      From july, one month and a half ago: http://www.boxingscene.com/golovkin-...-fight--106710


                      You were saying?? ahh ok...
                      They had not sanctioned, now they have decided they aren't going to.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP