Comments Thread For: WBA Declines To Sanction Golovkin-Brook Middleweight Bout

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • _Maxi
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Feb 2015
    • 8978
    • 509
    • 718
    • 91,740

    #31
    Originally posted by Can'tHoldMeBack
    The streak is for consecutive defenses...
    The meaning of consecutive in this context is "without a loss". If he moved up or down for a single fight and then came back to 160 it doesn't mean that the streak is ruined. Same happens here. And anyway it's still a world title bout by the WBC, IBF, IBO.

    Comment

    • Fists_of_Fury
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Feb 2006
      • 7366
      • 2,351
      • 12,608
      • 58,085

      #32
      Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP
      For the first time since he's held a version of its middleweight title, Gennady Golovkin will enter a prizefight without the World Boxing Association (WBA) title at stake.

      His upcoming September 10 showdown with Kell Brook - an unbeaten welterweight who will move up two divisions - will come without the sanctioning of the WBA, the organization formally announced Thursday afternoon.
      [Click Here To Read More]

      Comment

      • _Maxi
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Feb 2015
        • 8978
        • 509
        • 718
        • 91,740

        #33
        Originally posted by Isaac Clarke
        consecutive
        kənˈsɛkjʊtɪv/
        adjective
        adjective: consecutive

        1.
        following each other continuously.
        Ok, I give you that if that makes you happy. Would he still lose the "consecutive" defenses if he moved down or up for a single fight?

        Comment

        • Robbie Barrett
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Nov 2013
          • 40891
          • 2,779
          • 667
          • 570,921

          #34
          Originally posted by _Maxi
          The meaning of consecutive in this context is "without a loss". If he moved up or down for a single fight and then came back to 160 it doesn't mean that the streak is ruined. Same happens here. And anyway it's still a world title bout by the WBC, IBF, IBO.
          consecutive
          kənˈsɛkjʊtɪv/
          adjective
          adjective: consecutive

          1.
          following each other continuously.


          Maxi trying to change the definition of a word.

          Which title is he defending for the 16th time Maxi?

          Comment

          • Can'tHoldMeBack
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Jan 2016
            • 748
            • 42
            • 1
            • 7,021

            #35
            Originally posted by Isaac Clarke
            consecutive
            kənˈsɛkjʊtɪv/
            adjective
            adjective: consecutive

            1.
            following each other continuously.
            Don't even try and teach him anything he prob think the streak will carry on if was a draw, the lil g kool aid clouds these dudes judgement

            Comment

            • PivotandRoll
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jan 2015
              • 2540
              • 98
              • 26
              • 9,327

              #36
              Originally posted by doubletake
              Is that actually a real word?
              Contability is not an English word but Italian. The word refers to bookkeeping,accountancy, or accounting department. The closest English word to contability is compatibility.

              Google search is very useful.

              Comment

              • Robbie Barrett
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Nov 2013
                • 40891
                • 2,779
                • 667
                • 570,921

                #37
                Originally posted by _Maxi
                Ok, I give you that if that makes you happy. Would he still lose the "consecutive" defenses if he moved down or up for a single fight?
                No because they wouldn't be MW fights.

                Comment

                • Can'tHoldMeBack
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Jan 2016
                  • 748
                  • 42
                  • 1
                  • 7,021

                  #38
                  Originally posted by _Maxi
                  The meaning of consecutive in this context is "without a loss". If he moved up or down for a single fight and then came back to 160 it doesn't mean that the streak is ruined. Same happens here. And anyway it's still a world title bout by the WBC, IBF, IBO.
                  bro just stop if he move up or down weight class the consecutive streak comes to an end because his next wouldn't be him defending it

                  Comment

                  • _Maxi
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Feb 2015
                    • 8978
                    • 509
                    • 718
                    • 91,740

                    #39
                    Originally posted by doubletake
                    Is that actually a real word?
                    No I don't think so, but you got it

                    Comment

                    • _Maxi
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Feb 2015
                      • 8978
                      • 509
                      • 718
                      • 91,740

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Isaac Clarke
                      No because they wouldn't be MW fights.
                      Originally posted by Can'tHoldMeBack
                      bro just stop if he move up or down weight class the consecutive streak comes to an end because his next wouldn't be him defending it
                      See? you don't even agree on this part.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP