Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Spence: Brook Can Drop Out of Golovkin Fight, Face Me Instead

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by Kagami Taiga View Post
    They haven't because there isnt much sense behind it. Brook wouldn't do it either if the money wasn't right. If he had to choose between Golovkin and a Khan fight, he'd choose a Khan fight so let's be real.
    Saunders wants $4 million to fight GGG and he's crazy. He's pricing himself out. Brook gets $4 mil to fight GGG and he's a warrior

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by Progrssive_Jedi View Post
      Why do people think just because Brook is getting paid well for fighting GGG that it means he isn't doing it for the challenge or it's somehow lessened. That's just ******.

      And Brook won't fight spence.

      Thurman won't fight Spence.

      Thurman could have had Mayweather if he fist fought spence, and didn't do it.

      Why would he do it when Spence looks even tougher and there is no huge reward.

      Thurman ain't shiiiiit, Spence would do him dirty and leave him sleeping.

      i agree with most of your points but here is why i think brook isn't doing it for the challenge as much as he's doing it as a cash grab. 176 30 days out (almost exceeding the limit)

      his main focus should be on speed, durability, stamina. gameplan gameplan gameplan. his entire camp should be about gameplan. losing a bunch of weight is just a distraction. if he was 160 he could focus on his keys to victory for your entire training camp without missing a step (do u know how much of a blessing that is) 176? 11 pounds bigger then even golovkin? people don't find that weird? & then his excuse is that he is looking to have body building thick legs in the fight........brook. put the hotdog down and cut the **** haha.


      oh my bad (sorry laced)
      Last edited by Godsfly; 08-22-2016, 12:01 AM.

      Comment


      • #53
        Spence tells Brook to drop out of GGG fight...

        Yes, Error Spence wants Brook to drop out of the Golovkin fight while he takes his place to prove that he can be a better match with Golovkin than Brook.
        Golovkin vs Spence is better than Golovkin vs Brook!
        I'm afraid Golovkin will be the underdog in this one... by a wide margin!
        Last edited by AboveTheBelt; 08-22-2016, 12:03 AM.

        Comment


        • #54
          spence could always fight some other mw. doesnt have to be 3g.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by Boxing Logic View Post
            He's an Al Haymon fighter. Thurman is a risk. Haymon fighters don't take risks, not the chosen ones like Danny Garcia, now Spence. He's going to get the Floyd treatment ("everything's supposed to go easy for me") for the next decade. But y'all go root for him anyway see what happens to the sport you claim to like! Me, I'm not going to follow his career at all until he fights Thurman, and when he does fight Thurman, I'm going to hope he loses so that Haymon won't protect his 0 for the next decade and actually put him in real fights. Then I might root for him but as long as he's protected, the best thing fans can do is ignore his career, and hope he loses if he ever does face an opponent where that's even a remote possibility.
            You do realise that Spence did call out Thurman last year right? Right after Floyd told Thurman to fight Spence on his undercard in order to get a Floyd payday, and Spence was clearly up for it coz he called Thurman out immediately after his own fight, and Dibella too said he was keen on making the fight.

            Do you know who came out enraged with a three page list of excuses to not make the fight? If you didn't already know, or must have forgot, then lemmie tell you exactly who it was, it was Keith one time Thurman. Fool came out and said Spence aint done nothing to deserve him (even though he wasn't even a world champion at the time and had only faced Guerrero) and gave a whole three page essay about why he wouldn't fight Spence.

            Ya'll must have forgot though.

            Comment


            • #56
              If Brook beats Golovkin there is no way he's going back to 147. He'll either campaign at MW or go back down to 154.

              If he loses to Golovkin he'll likely stay at 147 though.

              Comment


              • #57
                Spence is a hot prospect .....period but Bundu was in his time a very good fringe contender BUT at 42 his days were numbered and this is what happens
                at his age against a young fiery contender.

                If Brook can not make 147lbs as looks likely then he should do the right thing and vacate regardless of the GGG result, as like Khan still WBC no.contender (?)! all's these guys are doing is tying up the division while doing other money ventures.We will know when Kell fights in a couple of weeks where the land lies but my guess is Spence will be fighting for the vacant title and I don't mean because of a Brook victory!

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by Bushbaby View Post
                  Here's something real, Brook is fighting GGG, not Khan. Hopkins jumped 2 weight classes and beat the man at 175. Mosley fought a prime DLH at 147 and both won. It makes sense if your balls have dropped. GGG is an oxymoron for even fighting Brook. But Ezekiel is a ballsy dude for trying to slay dragons.
                  So basically you just quoted examples that prove my very point. Cong****.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by Sledgeweather17 View Post
                    You do realise that Spence did call out Thurman last year right? Right after Floyd told Thurman to fight Spence on his undercard in order to get a Floyd payday, and Spence was clearly up for it coz he called Thurman out immediately after his own fight, and Dibella too said he was keen on making the fight.

                    Do you know who came out enraged with a three page list of excuses to not make the fight? If you didn't already know, or must have forgot, then lemmie tell you exactly who it was, it was Keith one time Thurman. Fool came out and said Spence aint done nothing to deserve him (even though he wasn't even a world champion at the time and had only faced Guerrero) and gave a whole three page essay about why he wouldn't fight Spence.

                    Ya'll must have forgot though.
                    Truth the sad thing is that Thurman ain't want that work plus who's to say Brook wasn't up for the fight people act like Thurman did damage on Bundu which clearly isn't the case if Thurman clearly has the power he's claiming how come he ain't knock Bundu Guererro or Porter out at the same time Spence is proving himself and Brook will see this and take Khan if he does not beat Golovkin but I see Brook giving Golovkin great work regardless of weight being at 176 but Spence beats Thurman Porter and hurts Garcia late but people want to be mad at Brook for taking the fight he's just doing what a real boxer is suppose to do at the end of the day

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by Godsfly View Post
                      u have been such a clown in this thread & wouldn't be surprise if u tried to say that..........


                      "FEEELINGS. it's gonna be major FEEELINGS"
                      A clown compared to a guy who tried to say Brook felt it was a bigger risk taking on GGG?

                      Alright.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP