Why So Much Praise For The "If Only" Fighters: (Toney, Judah, Khan, etc.)

[IronDanHamza]

Don't quote me again you clown.

I've heard it all now.

Michael Nunn was far, far, far away from being a great fighter, and it's a fact?

Ha!

Yeah.

I'll quote you whenever I feel like it mate.

Micheal-Nunn-is-not-a-great-fighter.

That is a fact.

He's not even HOF calibur.

[IronDanHamza]

So if he made weight comfortably, what would he have done differently to make those "razor thin decisions" turn in his favor?

Why didn't he make the weight properly the second time?

Excuses, as usual.

[LoadedWraps]

It's not all that matters.

Just because he was ranked as one of the best in the world in 1991 doesn't make him a great fighter.

Irregardless of that fact, when he was beaten then, he was regarded as a great fighter at that particular place and time, thus, it's a quality win.

[IronDanHamza]

Irregardless of that fact, when he was beaten then, he was regarded as a great fighter at that particular place and time, thus, it's a quality win.

Since when has being ranked #3 P4P = Great fighter?

He was considered one of the best fighters in the world for a very short space of time. That does not equal being a great fighter.

A quality win yes, in a fight he was being schooled in before pulling it back.

Still not a great fighter.

[Sugar Adam Ali]

Lmao... No, he wasn't robbed against Samuel Peter, Sam won both times fair and square.

Toney won the first fight clearly and was robbed, 2nd fight was all Peter