yet another straw man argument.
You dismissed the issue by talking about how frequently they fight (which has NOTHING to do with being roided or not). I simply said that how frequently they fight has NOTHING to do with them getting hurt and gave specific examples.
Stop ducking the issue. The number of fights is irrelevant.
Done.
You don't understand the difference.
I fully understand the risk to a fighter in the ring. But that risk is under the assumption of a 50/50 playing field. Thus why the Golovkin/Brook and Canelo/Khan fights are jokes. They're not 50/50.
When you're on PEDs - I mean REAL PEDs - you are now at 60/40, 70/30, etc. That's more dangerous than an even fight.
You dismissed the issue by talking about how frequently they fight (which has NOTHING to do with being roided or not). I simply said that how frequently they fight has NOTHING to do with them getting hurt and gave specific examples.
Stop ducking the issue. The number of fights is irrelevant.
Done.
You don't understand the difference.
I fully understand the risk to a fighter in the ring. But that risk is under the assumption of a 50/50 playing field. Thus why the Golovkin/Brook and Canelo/Khan fights are jokes. They're not 50/50.
When you're on PEDs - I mean REAL PEDs - you are now at 60/40, 70/30, etc. That's more dangerous than an even fight.
Comment