Eh? Did Froch ever move up in weight? Why does he have to move up in weight?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Froch To Golovkin: Pick on Someone Your Own Size or Move Up!
Collapse
-
Originally posted by 1g5a22 View PostEh? Did Froch ever move up in weight? Why does he have to move up in weight?
GGG on the otherhand is handed belts he doesnt fight for, is so called ducked(move up then), but has not eliminated the top 5 middleweights or a least a few to establish himself as clearly the best middleweight. He is wasting his time on welterweights and no hopers.
Froch has two wins over groves, ko'ed Bute, wins over Dirrell, Kessler, etc
GGG resume looks like a contender not a champion compared to Froch's...froch took risks...GGG does not
Comment
-
Originally posted by therealpugilist View PostFroch fought in a deep division where he fought every notable name, almost every champion of his era...earned everything in the ring
GGG on the otherhand is handed belts he doesnt fight for, is so called ducked(move up then), but has not eliminated the top 5 middleweights or a least a few to establish himself as clearly the best middleweight. He is wasting his time on welterweights and no hopers.
Froch has two wins over groves, ko'ed Bute, wins over Dirrell, Kessler, etc
GGG resume looks like a contender not a champion compared to Froch's...froch took risks...GGG does not
Comment
-
Originally posted by 1g5a22 View PostState the obvious on Frochs resume why don't ya! Why does he have to move up in weight? Are you saying he isn't entitled to be a MW?
Comment
-
Originally posted by therealpugilist View Posthe is required to fight middleweights and not welterweights, and actually defend his titles versus serious top ten contenders....not guys we have to google to know who they are like dominic wade..never saw a fighter who did so little be so hyped...he hasnt beat anyone near the p4p or anyone considered elite yet he supposed to be top 3 p4p? KMSL....hahahahahahahahahahahaha
Comment
-
Originally posted by therealpugilist View Postyea thats murderer's row right there...KMSL....4 of those guys you wouldnt even know if they didnt fight GGG...MAJORITY of the fighters GGG knocked out were already stopped before
its sad but brook may be his best opponent
How can GGG be great when he has done nothing great? who has he beat that was great, very good, or elite? no one
Comment
-
Originally posted by Red Cyclone View PostNow apply the same question to Kovalev, Froch, Ward, Kessler.
they also actually won their titles IN THE RING!!!!
if anyone would be considered great, it wouldnt be GGG because he has literally done the least
now ask yourself...has GGG fought the top guys in his division like Kovalev, Froch, Ward oR Kessler? no excuses, just a yes or a no....you wont answer the question....you're a coward
Comment
-
Originally posted by therealpugilist View Postno one said these guys were great...they were/are all proven elite fighters because they took on the best of their division.....GGG has not
they also actually won their titles IN THE RING!!!!
if anyone would be considered great, it wouldnt be GGG because he has literally done the least
now ask yourself...has GGG fought the top guys in his division like Kovalev, Froch, Ward oR Kessler? no excuses, just a yes or a no....you wont answer the question....you're a coward
Sergio Martinez
Miguel Cotto
Saul Alvarez
Peter Quillin
Felix Sturm
Eubank Jr
Billy Joe Saunders
All talk a good game but when it comes to making it happen they go hiding, it's sort of the same problem Rigondeuax has but the only difference is people use the excuse of Rigo being boring that's why he doesn't get fights and that fighting him doesn't earn you a payday.
Fighting Golovkin at this stage will see you paid a million or two and maybe more and he doesn't put on a boring show fighting.
So should we consider people who refuse to fight the best and refuse to get a few million dollars in their bank account because they're scared of losing should we say that these guys are the "top guys"?
The short answer is no he has fought the best of his division because everyone willing to get in the ring with him should be held in a higher esteem than the likes of Eubank Jr, Canelo and BJS.
If someone is that scared of earning a couple million dollars because of losing it shows that they really aren't the top of the division.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Red Cyclone View PostWell as things stand he holds all the belts thanks to people not wanting to actually fight him lol.
Sergio Martinez
Miguel Cotto
Saul Alvarez
Peter Quillin
Felix Sturm
Eubank Jr
Billy Joe Saunders
All talk a good game but when it comes to making it happen they go hiding, it's sort of the same problem Rigondeuax has but the only difference is people use the excuse of Rigo being boring that's why he doesn't get fights and that fighting him doesn't earn you a payday.
Fighting Golovkin at this stage will see you paid a million or two and maybe more and he doesn't put on a boring show fighting.
So should we consider people who refuse to fight the best and refuse to get a few million dollars in their bank account because they're scared of losing should we say that these guys are the "top guys"?
The short answer is no he has fought the best of his division because everyone willing to get in the ring with him should be held in a higher esteem than the likes of Eubank Jr, Canelo and BJS.
If someone is that scared of earning a couple million dollars because of losing it shows that they really aren't the top of the division.
Claiming, men who fight for a living are "scared" is a joke. More like they want to be compensated properly. pro boxing is called"prizefighting" for a reason. You cant expect to pay BJS or Eubank Jr. the same as what the Adama's, Wade's get.
Comment
Comment