Comments Thread For: Froch To Golovkin: Pick on Someone Your Own Size or Move Up!

[BillyBoxing]

Firstly, that is a triangle theory, triangle-theories do not work in boxing.

Secondly, Pascal is much better than David Lemieux..... who is not much more than an unskilled puncher.





Again, that is a triangle-theory..... one that didn't even happen.

A triangle-theory - no matter how poor - cannot include fantasy wins.

Secondly, are you kidding..... Abraham is much better than Geale.





Dirrell BEAT Golovkin in the am's, and Froch turned into a better pro than Dirrell..... but AGAIN, triangle theories simply do not work in boxing.




Now you've gone full-******, I will ignore the rest of that inaccurate post.

Except for this..... " Groves=Murray ".

Murray is Golovkin's best win.

So, are you telling me that a guy who is NOT Froch's best win, who he KTFO TWICE when he was an old man..... is on-par with Golovkin's biggest prime win?

If that is true, then you should stop with the triangle-theories.....

No, Golovkin beat Direll you boxing expert.

[BillyBoxing]

Lil G fans don't mention Geale as much as the used to since Cotto destroyed him.

Hatton destroying Castillo makes it a sht win for Floyd?

GGG took Geales soul, litterally killed him.

Geale only lost razor SD decision when he fought GGG and got blew out, never was the same fighter since.

Geale beat guys like Sturm, Sylvester, Mundine and was far from being a bum.

[Weebler I]

All the people who don't want to fight Golovkin are pretty good at telling him what he should be doing. Funny that.

[Robbie Barrett]

Hatton destroying Castillo makes it a sht win for Floyd?

GGG took Geales soul, litterally killed him.

Geale only lost razor SD decision when he fought GGG and got blew out, never was the same fighter since.

Geale beat guys like Sturm, Sylvester, Mundine and was far from being a bum.

He lost to ****ing Barker the guy wasn't that good.

"GGG took Geales soul, litterally killed him." Oh please stop the nonsense the guy was **** to begin with. Cotto would have done the same to the Geale Golovkin fought.

[aboutfkntime]

No, Golovkin beat Direll you boxing expert.

Dirrell beat Golovkin 3 months earlier.

Dirrell thinks he won both fights.

[aboutfkntime]

Dirrell thinks he won both fights.

Golovkin got Dirrell problems

[New England]

Dirrell beat Golovkin 3 months earlier.

Dirrell thinks he won both fights.

do you have any verifying proof of this, because it sounds awfully fishy to me!

golovkin beat dirrell in the olympics. they fought 3 months before the olympics ?

Edit:
i'm on vacation, so i looekd around a bit. according to dirrel they fought in mississippi a few months before the olympics, but i can't find anything other than that and some forum posts to verify. if the fight did happen, it appears that it was on american soil and extremely close on the cards, which probably means that golovkin should have gotten the nod. when it mattered, in the olumpics, golovkin won the fight.


as for the loss, it's on video on youtube. dirrell looked very tired by the 4th round, and did not do enough to close the gap. golovkin was actually landing the cleaner punches on the outside, and when dirrell got close he didn't know how to keep his hands free and work. ugly fight, but a very clear golovkin win by the point scoring system used in the olympics in 2004.

golovkin beat a who's who in the amatuers at or around 165 lbs. geale, lee, dirrell, despaigne, korobov, bute, and i'm probably forgetting somebody.

[aboutfkntime]

do you have any verifying proof of this, because it sounds awfully fishy to me!

golovkin beat dirrell in the olympics. they fought 3 months before the olympics ?

Edit:
i'm on vacation, so i looekd around a bit. according to dirrel they fought in mississippi a few months before the olympics, but i can't find anything other than that and some forum posts to verify. if the fight did happen, it appears that it was on american soil and extremely close on the cards, which probably means that golovkin should have gotten the nod. when it mattered, in the olumpics, golovkin won the fight.


as for the loss, it's on video on youtube. dirrell looked very tired by the 4th round, and did not do enough to close the gap. golovkin was actually landing the cleaner punches on the outside, and when dirrell got close he didn't know how to keep his hands free and work. ugly fight, but a very clear golovkin win by the point scoring system used in the olympics in 2004.

golovkin beat a who's who in the amatuers at or around 165 lbs. geale, lee, dirrell, despaigne, korobov, bute, and i'm probably forgetting somebody.

Nah, Dirrell did beat Golovkin 3 months earlier.

Not sure what you meant by this..... "it appears that it was on american soil and extremely close on the cards, which probably means that golovkin should have gotten the nod"..... not sure how you can effectively gauge that w/o watching the fight.

The point is.....
* Froch turned into a better pro than Dirrell
* triangle-theories do not work in boxing

All I am saying is, Golovkin beating Froch is far from a given.

And Golovkin should get those wins in the ring, not on paper.

[BillyBoxing]

nah, dirrell did beat golovkin 3 months earlier.

Not sure what you meant by this..... "it appears that it was on american soil and extremely close on the cards, which probably means that golovkin should have gotten the nod"..... Not sure how you can effectively gauge that w/o watching the fight.

The point is.....
* froch turned into a better pro than dirrell
* triangle-theories do not work in boxing

all i am saying is, golovkin beating froch is far from a given.

And golovkin should get those wins in the ring, not on paper.

how can you comment in every threads talking about a fighter you don t care and even dislike.

Respond please you ****in freak.

[BillyBoxing]

Dirrell beat Golovkin 3 months earlier.

Dirrell thinks he won both fights.

Direll think he won the Froch fight.

Golovkin beat Direll in the Olympics, and not in his hometown like Froch.