For you name droppers on NSB, be a man and answer these 4 simple questions

[therealpugilist]

why this guy make every subject about GGG....wow this is getting out of control!

Yea I guess your slow azz missed all the threads I made between the last GGG thread I made...its been weeks since I made one

if those are the only threads you notice..not my problem

[therealpugilist]

yeah i do as a matter of fact, people want to see knockouts which is why GGG is gettting so much attention. People dont want to see fighters stinking out the joint like ward does every single ****ing time.

substance>style

you like hypejobs and unproven fighters who fight low level oppostion their entire career....coool..its all cleared up

[Chuckguy]

Froch and Kessler were 1 and 2 at 168 when Ward left and top 3 while he was there

your dumb azz dont even know what elite means smh

Well by your logic then
Alfonso blanco
Chris Eubanks jr
And dmitry chudinov are all elite because they are all ranked in the top 3 in their prospective division

[Madison Boxing]

substance>style

you like hypejobs and unproven fighters who fight low level oppostion their entire career....coool..its all cleared up

and you have a fetish for boring fighters, must be your 'thing'.

[Madison Boxing]

Again, with your inability to grasp the basic concept of boxing, MMA would be more your thing. Just think very little movement and literally no defence.

what concept can i not grasp, that a 12 round snoozefest is better than a knockout? You seem to think anyone who likes exciting fighters is a casual lol

[_Maxi]

this is simple as ABC and 123..i respect both fighters...GGG fanatics are hypocrites....their is a difference between a fan and a illogical fanatic

now use common sense

These questions are in regards to Ward and GGG and their Career's in entirety

1) who has has fought more world champions?

2) Who has actually defeated fighters who were considered p4p and/or elite

3) who won more titles/ belts IN THE RING?

4) who has moved up fought across more divisions and poundage?

5) who is younger and has less fights?

now you know the answers to these......answering these questions dont support your position/agenda

now when you answer these questions, IF YOU EVEN REPLY.....it should show you how silly it is for GGG fanATICs to question someone else's resume when his is so weak in comparison, for a fighter so hyped. deal with it
__________________

[Chuckguy]

Answer the questions

[Dean_Razorback]

yep, you are not mad, right? just like i said, you started another thread to reply to someone you don't agree with

[IronDanHamza]

depends on the publication and posters.....he was lower top ten before and always on the fringe

was a top 5 guy at 168 over 5 years

No publication ever had him top 10 P4P at any point.

[OnePunch]

threads like these are pointless, the fanatics you are targeting will not relent.... Being a ggg fan boy doesn't mean you can't criticise ward's resume, it's easily open to critique especially the last couple of years.

Ward having a better resume doesn't change the fact that he has done very little of substance in recent years, because of that a loss to kovalev could be quite damaging.

Just because fighter a has done more than fighter b doesn't mean fans of fighter b can't criticise fighter a.

very well said.......