I'd rather be a boring loser like the TS.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Would you rather be a boring winner or an exciting loser?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
It's not about what ' I ' want to be, it's obvious everyone would want to be a winner regardless of the method.
It's about us, the hardcore fan's want to SEE...which, obviously is exciting fight's.
Only boxing hipsters and causal's try and justify boring fights/boxers, as they have identified with them due to the color of their flag/skin.
which is lame af.
' he WON DOE ' yeah and if every boxer in the sport employed the same tactics, the sport would not exist, because no one would pay to watch anymore.
Comment
-
I'd rather be Pacquiao, Duran, Hagler and Tyson
i might lose, but you're gonna respect the beatdowns i give
Comment
-
Originally posted by larryxxx.... View PostWould you rather be called boring, take less punishment and win
Or be called exciting, take tons of punishment and lose??
their are no moral victories in boxing and anyone who believes they do are idiots and never played sports a day in their life
I never gave a crap about entertaining the fans...its about winning...if the fight, match or game is entertaining cool.
I dont care if I win boring, by a round, or by shutout....its about the W
The problem with a lot of people is they arent used to dominance and cant relate to things coming easy. some relate to struggle. like uncle roger said " people belief in bull****".....i.e. rocky movies. underdog stories and rock em sock em robots
thats why they love fighters like Marciano, Gatti, Saad Muhammad. They were entertaining but at the end of the day I'd rather hit, and not get hit, leave with all my marbles and money in tact.
thats why I always watched the winners....the leonards, mayweathers, joe Louis types...more times than not, they kicked your azz outright, no struggle and made it look easy
Comment
Comment