Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hearn Admits Concern in Making a Joshua vs. Hughie Fury Bout

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    I think bermane stiverne would be the most entertaining of the bunch & id love 2 see joshua knock him out!!!

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by denium View Post
      He won every round against Kassi, and I doubt he's getting banned. If UKAD had any real evidence he'd be banned already.


      Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android
      The Fluff's contested the charge and enlisted a barrister, I'd say they're in deep. An investigation that isn't going away until they've attended their hearing in which their is sufficient evidence to suggest they will be banned.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by denium View Post
        Stiverne is a punchbag who comes forward in straight lines. Hughie Fury would pose more a challenge for AJ due to his footwork & size alone.

        Stiverne is made for Joshua, plus he's looked terrible in his recent fights, getting dropped by journeymen etc. He's dog****.
        Agreed. Stiverne is garbage

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Scott.Weiland.
          Quote:

          Originally Posted by denium

          He won every round against Kassi, and I doubt he's getting banned. If UKAD had any real evidence he'd be banned already.


          Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

          The Fluff's contested the charge and enlisted a barrister, I'd say they're in deep. An investigation that isn't going away until they've attended their hearing in which their is sufficient evidence to suggest they will be banned.
          Obviously they've hired a lawyer, who wouldn't? Like I say, if UKAD had any real evidence, both the Fury's would be banned right now.

          It's amusing how outraged you are about this, I don't recall seeing you get this worked up when discussing Luis Ortiz.



          Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by denium View Post
            Obviously they've hired a lawyer, who wouldn't? Like I say, if UKAD had any real evidence, both the Fury's would be banned right now.

            It's amusing how outraged you are about this, I don't recall seeing you get this worked up when discussing Luis Ortiz.



            Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android
            Luis Ortiz didn't use PED's to con Wlad of his titles. Fluff has apparently been using PEDs in the run up to facing Klitschko to build muscle and stamina. Why would I be anything other than outraged ?

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by soul_survivor View Post
              I agree with the essex twat for once, this is too risky to schedule.

              AJ v Stiverne would be a perfect fight at this stage, then Parker next year and then the Pulev clash if Pulev keeps winning.
              I pretty much agree. Hughie may cause a cancellation, and then a low-quality replacement.

              Pulev is willing, and so are several others.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Scott.Weiland. View Post
                Luis Ortiz didn't use PED's to con Wlad of his titles. Fluff has apparently been using PEDs in the run up to facing Klitschko to build muscle and stamina. Why would I be anything other than outraged ?
                Why didn't UKAD ban him straight away if he was caught using PEDS? The B sample came back negative, as did a blood test. A judge agreed and told UKAD to f*** off.

                If this was all so cut and dry like you're saying, why hasn't Fury been stripped of his titles? Why is he fighting Wlad again in October?

                Tyson was tested to death for the Klitschko fight and was a completely clean fighter, Wlad just got beaten by the better man, and will be retired in a couple of months by the same man.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by denium View Post
                  Why didn't UKAD ban him straight away if he was caught using PEDS? The B sample came back negative, as did a blood test. A judge agreed and told UKAD to f*** off.

                  If this was all so cut and dry like you're saying, why hasn't Fury been stripped of his titles? Why is he fighting Wlad again in October?

                  Tyson was tested to death for the Klitschko fight and was a completely clean fighter, Wlad just got beaten by the better man, and will be retired in a couple of months by the same man.
                  They have suspended him from fighting, a fortnight before the rematch. Now he has contested it he is going before a tribunal and the UKAD have lifted their ban as it is out of their hands.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by Scott.Weiland. View Post
                    They have suspended him from fighting, a fortnight before the rematch. Now he has contested it he is going before a tribunal and the UKAD have lifted their ban as it is out of their hands.
                    A judge forced them to lift their suspension, no doubt due to a lack of evidence.

                    Whyte got caught with PEDs in his system, straight ban. Galahad got caught with PEDS in his system, straight ban. See a pattern emerging here?

                    I know you're absolutely desperate to see Wlad given his belts back due to him being unable to defeat Fury in the ring, but you're grasping at straws.

                    Fury will be completely exonerated very soon and UKAD exposed for the biased, incompetent fools they are.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by denium View Post
                      A judge forced them to lift their suspension, no doubt due to a lack of evidence.

                      Whyte got caught with PEDs in his system, straight ban. Galahad got caught with PEDS in his system, straight ban. See a pattern emerging here?

                      I know you're absolutely desperate to see Wlad given his belts back due to him being unable to defeat Fury in the ring, but you're grasping at straws.

                      Fury will be completely exonerated very soon and UKAD exposed for the biased, incompetent fools they are.
                      Or could it be those two didnt have a coin to scratch their A holes with at the time, but the Fluff's have new found wealth, through cheating might I add. Not that you'd expect any less from gypsies anyway.

                      May I ask you a question and you promise to answer it honestly ?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP