Comments Thread For: Jacobs Targets Saunders in December, Ultimately Wants Golovkin

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ake-Dawg
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jun 2016
    • 5510
    • 127
    • 80
    • 76,361

    #21
    Wouldn't a fight vs Trip be bigger if it's for all the belts? I swear...folks say that chasing all the belts is honorable. Well Jacobs just said that's what he plans to do. Isn't it logical to fight the lesser fighter 1st. Then the big fight versus Trip? That way....if you lose, you still get the mega fight check. I mean...be disappointed he's taking that route because you wanna see him and Trip get it on in the ring. Why trash him and talk trash if the approach is sensible. I guess some of yall just come here to talk ish and leave.

    Comment

    • bojangles1987
      bo jungle
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jul 2009
      • 41118
      • 1,326
      • 357
      • 63,028

      #22
      Every other relevant middleweight has given Golovkin the "maybe in 18 months doe" excuse. So annoying.

      Comment

      • Boxing Logic
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2016
        • 4049
        • 442
        • 65
        • 59,061

        #23
        Originally posted by Ake-Dawg
        Wouldn't a fight vs Trip be bigger if it's for all the belts? I swear...folks say that chasing all the belts is honorable. Well Jacobs just said that's what he plans to do. Isn't it logical to fight the lesser fighter 1st. Then the big fight versus Trip? That way....if you lose, you still get the mega fight check. I mean...be disappointed he's taking that route because you wanna see him and Trip get it on in the ring. Why trash him and talk trash if the approach is sensible. I guess some of yall just come here to talk ish and leave.
        Wouldn't the fight vs Saunders be bigger if he had all GGG's belts??? So isn't it logical to fight GGG first then?

        Let's not pretend here. He wants to fight Saunders first because he's easier, not because of any belt. He's sure he can beat Saunders, then go to GGG (supposedly......). He's not sure he can beat GGG, then go to Saunders. That's all it is.

        Boxers these days want to create megafights without even engaging in good fights first. I won't say it never happens that way, but it rarely happens, and when it does, it usually takes like 10 years of built up fan frustration from you never fighting anyone for them to shell out on one big fight hoping this is finally the time they see you tested. And that's 10 years of waiting to build up a megafight taking no risks the whole time that could have been used taking smaller risks, a few big risks, fighting in multiple megafights, winning some, losing some, but actually having a real, historically relevant boxing career, and making even more money. And if you actually win those risks, then multiple megafights open up down the road, not just one.

        But fighters these days don't believe in themselves like that. They just want zero risks, then one megafight, and that's it, I guess. But again how are you going to build up a megafight without taking any risks?

        Like if Jacobs really wants to build this up, beating Saunders does nothing. What creates a megafight is the perception of risk. People have to believe Jacobs is a big risk to GGG. Then it becomes a megafight.

        So if Jacobs really wants to build up the GGG fight, and it's not just about ducking him for another year, then James Degale is the fight. Show you can take a super middleweight's punches. Show you can chin check a super middleweight. You do that, now people see you as a real risk to GGG. Now people will pay to see it on PPV. But Jacobs who is twice as fast and twice as powerful as Saunders beating Saunders? That doesn't really enhance anything because it doesn't tell us anything we don't already know. The big question is can Jacobs take GGG's shots, and fighting light punching Saunders doesn't tell us that.

        Comment

        • TheCell8
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Mar 2016
          • 5551
          • 353
          • 44
          • 38,715

          #24
          Not gonna happen... BJS is appearing on Canelo's undercard for a reason. That's the guy that Golden Boy will go after.

          Comment

          • TheCell8
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Mar 2016
            • 5551
            • 353
            • 44
            • 38,715

            #25
            He can fight Chris Eubank Jr. in December and Golovkin can fight DeGale.

            Comment

            • MrClutch85
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Mar 2010
              • 4081
              • 81
              • 0
              • 15,236

              #26
              Saunders is waiting for Canelo he's not going to risk fighting Jacobs or Golovkin

              Comment

              • Kigali
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jun 2016
                • 17128
                • 263
                • 0
                • 19,441

                #27
                Originally posted by Progrssive_Jedi
                This guy wants nothing to do with GGG and he knows it. Stop it Jacobs, you're it fooling anyone.
                You're sweating aren't you?

                Comment

                • Kigali
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jun 2016
                  • 17128
                  • 263
                  • 0
                  • 19,441

                  #28
                  Originally posted by megas30
                  Jacobs, Quillin and Saunders need to leave boxing. Three of the biggest cowards in the sport today.
                  They should take GGG's scary ass with them.

                  At least they aren't fighting a damn WW.

                  Comment

                  • Kigali
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Jun 2016
                    • 17128
                    • 263
                    • 0
                    • 19,441

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Ake-Dawg
                    Wouldn't a fight vs Trip be bigger if it's for all the belts? I swear...folks say that chasing all the belts is honorable. Well Jacobs just said that's what he plans to do. Isn't it logical to fight the lesser fighter 1st. Then the big fight versus Trip? That way....if you lose, you still get the mega fight check. I mean...be disappointed he's taking that route because you wanna see him and Trip get it on in the ring. Why trash him and talk trash if the approach is sensible. I guess some of yall just come here to talk ish and leave.
                    Amen to that.

                    They act like Jacobs is the one fighting Kel Brook.

                    Comment

                    • Deletrious
                      Interim Champion
                      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                      • May 2016
                      • 872
                      • 44
                      • 0
                      • 8,177

                      #30
                      Saunders is taking the easier fight and bigger money against Canelo and Jacobs is a fool if he doesn't see that.

                      I'd be excited if he was talking about Golovkin next, hope wba finally orders the damn fight.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP