Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The reason Lemieux doesn't want to fight Curtis Stevens

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    If he fights Stevens his kids will starve to death?

    Comment


    • #12
      DO thye not have a point?

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by jmrf4435 View Post
        DO thye not have a point?
        you think he will earn substantially more against kirkland than against stevens? i doubt there is much difference either way

        Comment


        • #14
          Who is Lemieux lining up that's better than Stevens? There are options out there for sure, Jacobs, Lee, Saunders, Eubank, and even Quillin are all good fights for him. But i haven't heard anything.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by kiaba360 View Post
            Stevens is ranked pretty high in all the sanctioning bodies. This could be a co-main to Canelo/Saunders (assuming the match-up even happens).

            Khurtsidze vs. Stevens, Lemieux vs. Heiland. GBP needs to start making some meaningful match-ups for their punchers.
            Both good fighters would like to see it happen,

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View Post
              He's saying he won't fight him. He says fighting Stevens does nothing for him and gets him nowhere. Saunders is also talking a bunch of ****. It's criminal the way they're both ducking Stevens smh. Lemieux is talking about fighting Kirkland and Saunders is talking about fighting Gabe Rosado
              Arent you an advocate of fighters getting paid? With your logic in other posts, Lemieux is doing the same thing you advocate for other fighters to your own bias.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Boxfan83 View Post
                Arent you an advocate of fighters getting paid? With your logic in other posts, Lemieux is doing the same thing you advocate for other fighters to your own bias.
                Yes I'm an advocate of fighters getting paid. Lemieux fighting Kirkland is going to get him paid more than fighting Stevens? Kirkland has priced himself out of fights before. He's unstable and demands more money than Stevens. And Kirkland isn't even ranked at MW. BJS fighting Rosado on the Canelo undercard pays more than Stevens? it Rosado or Stevens, that slot on the Canelo undercard is already budgeted for whomever fights there. Don't be ******

                Comment


                • #18
                  How does Lemieux know Stevens don't own property?

                  Seems like a extremely winnable fight for Lemieux thats a showcase fight so not sure why he wouldn't f#ck with it unless the pay is THAT bad & with how HBO is budgeted who knows it might be a dogshtt payday so fair play to Lemieux if that is the case.

                  Lemieux should be pressuring GBP into setting him up with Canelo so he can really get paid for real. I always assumed GBP was signing Lemieux up as a future Canelo body, but thus far there has seemed lil to suggest that is anywhere on Lemieux's schedule with GBP.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by Sadiqkingofko View Post
                    I don't see why Lemiux should fear Stevens tbh it would be easier than the Rosado fight for him and GBP can make it an elminator for title or something like that
                    Originally posted by kiaba360 View Post
                    Stevens is ranked pretty high in all the sanctioning bodies. This could be a co-main to Canelo/Saunders (assuming the match-up even happens).

                    Khurtsidze vs. Stevens, Lemieux vs. Heiland. GBP needs to start making some meaningful match-ups for their punchers.
                    Originally posted by Clegg View Post
                    If he fights Stevens his kids will starve to death?
                    Originally posted by NEETzsche View Post
                    you think he will earn substantially more against kirkland than against stevens? i doubt there is much difference either way
                    Originally posted by Dr Rumack View Post
                    Who is Lemieux lining up that's better than Stevens? There are options out there for sure, Jacobs, Lee, Saunders, Eubank, and even Quillin are all good fights for him. But i haven't heard anything.
                    Originally posted by Red Cyclone View Post
                    Both good fighters would like to see it happen,
                    Even Tureano Johnson won't fight him and he beat Johnson. All of these fighters are saying they have bigger opportunities but if they aren't fighting GGG, Jacobs, Canelo or each other, what are these bigger fights they're talking about?


                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Dr Rumack;16925270[B
                      ]Who is Lemieux lining up that's better than Stevens?[/B] There are options out there for sure, Jacobs, Lee, Saunders, Eubank, and even Quillin are all good fights for him. But i haven't heard anything.
                      Good question. Jacobs & Quillin are both with Haymon & with the Haymon vs ODLH thing I'm guessing those are no gos. BJS seems lined up next for Canelo. I tend to think the Eubank's would request Eubank Sr to take Roy's spot on HBO's announcing team before the fight is agreed to. So I guess Andy Lee is the most likely culprit & that does seem like a fun fight.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP