Floyd's come back was #2 p4p Marquez.... Pac's return... Vargas...

[New England]

You can call it as you wish.

I said if you call someone a fanboy and they are doing the exact same thing you are only with another fighter you and he are equals.

You often post this. You weren't there for Floyd, you were there for the fight. Quite possibly you were there to see Floyd lose.

you being there means nothing. I was at Bhop/Tito and am not a huge fan of either. I was also at Bhop/ODH and was hoping ODH would lose, I wasn't there for Bhop though.

Its fine to be a fan of a specific fighter. Since when did that become bad? Its also ok to respond to negative posts with positive factual posts.

Whenever a poster refutes negative posts about Floyd with positive facts they are called a fanboy. It's the lasting legacy from the Floyd/manny war. That you use the term so much shows that why you maybe weren't directly involved, you clearly have picked a side, which is ok.

you don't get to tell me why i was at a fight


you are not worth talking to, evidently. that you'd try and tell me why i was at a fight is a pathetic function of your fanboyism. it hurts you that i am objective, and you are nto.


my only interactions with you concern floyd mayweather fanboyism, because, you guessed it, you're the fanboy! no surpise that you're in golovkin threads doing the very same thing!

of course you'll ignore my criticisms of golovkin or ward, becuse i'm a fanboy of those two, right?


again, you don't get to tell me why i went to see floyd fight.

"you were really there to see him lose."

I F#CKING BET FLOYD MAYWEATHER. I WAS IN LINE WITH A BUNCH OF BLACKS JOKING ABOUT "GETTING OUR MAYWEATHER MONEY!"

f#cking get out of here . you're really not worth taking the time out of my day if you genuinely believ that you're in charge of telling me how i felt about a fight 3 years ago. in fact i'd start to question your sanity if you think that's how the world works.

[The Big Dunn]

you don't get to tell me why i was at a fight


you are not worth talking to, evidently. that you'd try and tell me why i was at a fight is a pathetic function of your fanboyism. it hurts you that i am objective, and you are nto.


my only interactions with you concern floyd mayweather fanboyism, because, you guessed it, you're the fanboy! no surpise that you're in golovkin threads doing the very same thing!

of course you'll ignore my criticisms of golovkin or ward, becuse i'm a fanboy of those two, right?


again, you don't get to tell me why i went to see floyd fight.

"you were really there to see him lose."

I F#CKING BET FLOYD MAYWEATHER. I WAS IN LINE WITH A BUNCH OF BLACKS JOKING ABOUT "GETTING OUR MAYWEATHER MONEY!"

f#cking get out of here . you're really not worth taking the time out of my day if you genuinely believ that you're in charge of telling me how i felt about a fight 3 years ago. in fact i'd start to question your sanity if you think that's how the world works.

LNFAO!!! You clearly misread the post. I'm not telling you why you were at the fight. I assume you were there for the fight as a fan, the same reason I went to the fights I listed. Geez, calm down with the fake outrage.

why would your position hurt me? if you make a point I agree or disagree with, I will quote it. I didn't quote you initially today, I made a point which you responded to.

the exact quote is

"Quite possibly you were there to see Floyd lose."

It isn't saying thats why you were there, but gives one reason you could have been. i then give examples using myself and those 2 fights to support my point.

Why does it matter that black people were in line with you? illustrates my point about picking sides.

you are purposely over reacting and then purposely quoted only a piece of what I posted to change it. thats BS. if you choose not to debate anymore, thats fine.

[New England]

LNFAO!!! You clearly misread the post. I'm not telling you why you were at the fight. I assume you were there for the fight as a fan, the same reason I went to the fights I listed. Geez, calm down with the fake outrage.

why would your position hurt me? if you make a point I agree or disagree with, I will quote it. I didn't quote you initially today, I made a point which you responded to.

the exact quote is It isn't saying thats why you were there, but gives one reason you could have been. i then give examples using myself and those 2 fights to support my point.

Why does it matter that black people were in line with you? illustrates my point about picking sides.

you are purposely over reacting and then purposely quoted only a piece of what I posted to change it. thats BS. if you choose not to debate anymore, thats fine.

dude you aren't "debating" anything when i tell you why i was there and you tell me i'm wrong "you weren't there for floyd... quite possibly there to see him lose."

maybe you genuinely don't get what you're doing


say it with me, "NE knows more about why he went to the fight than i know about why he went to the fight. i've never met new england in my life."

"debate"

[New England]

so i'm telling you that i went to see floyd fight becuase i'm a fan, and that's somehow a matter for debate?


and its up for debate becuase i said that manny was smaller than floyd, has a better resume, both were repsonsible for that fight taking place years after it should, and after manny had been knocked out? and it's up for debate because i caleld marquez a cherrypick in the same light that vargas is a cherrypick?

so that means you get to tell me why i went to a fight?


i get that this is NSB, but holy f#ck is this place completely void of anything resembling logic or common sense. this whole "nah NE you weren't there to see floyd" thing gets me the best.

most little floydians just ignore that i went to the fight when i bring it up. but you're telling me i wasn't there to see floyd . you're telling me what motivated me! i just can't take it

[The Big Dunn]

dude you aren't "debating" anything when i tell you why i was there and you tell me i'm wrong "you weren't there for floyd... quite possibly there to see him lose."

maybe you genuinely don't get what you're doing


say it with me, "NE knows more about why he went to the fight than i know about why he went to the fight. i've never met new england in my life."

"debate"

I never posted you were wrong. You are purposely over reacting. My guess is because my point about being a fanboy and picking sides dug at you. There was really no need to quote me initially.

Then you cut out a piece of my post to change it then you bring up the color of people in the betting line. now, as you usually do, you are trying to shift the debate to something else.

Is what it is.

[The Big Dunn]

so i'm telling you that i went to see floyd fight becuase i'm a fan, and that's somehow a matter for debate?


and its up for debate becuase i said that manny was smaller than floyd, has a better resume, both were repsonsible for that fight taking place years after it should, and after manny had been knocked out? and it's up for debate because i caleld marquez a cherrypick in the same light that vargas is a cherrypick?

so that means you get to tell me why i went to a fight?


i get that this is NSB, but holy f#ck is this place completely void of anything resembling logic or common sense. this whole "nah NE you weren't there to see floyd" thing gets me the best.

most little floydians just ignore that i went to the fight when i bring it up. but you're telling me i wasn't there to see floyd . you're telling me what motivated me! i just can't take it

is this directed at me? if so and you honestly think when I posted the word debate that it was referring to the sidebar you deflected to then you are truly ******.

I was referring to the debate relative to the thread topic only. I didn't see or respond to your post when I initially posted so I don't know what points you made.

now you are making up something and arguing it, another thing you do a lot.

[New England]

You can call it as you wish.

I said if you call someone a fanboy and they are doing the exact same thing you are only with another fighter you and he are equals.

You often post this. You weren't there for Floyd, you were there for the fight. Quite possibly you were there to see Floyd lose.

you being there means nothing. I was at Bhop/Tito and am not a huge fan of either. I was also at Bhop/ODH and was hoping ODH would lose, I wasn't there for Bhop though.

Its fine to be a fan of a specific fighter. Since when did that become bad? Its also ok to respond to negative posts with positive factual posts.

Whenever a poster refutes negative posts about Floyd with positive facts they are called a fanboy. It's the lasting legacy from the Floyd/manny war. That you use the term so much shows that why you maybe weren't directly involved, you clearly have picked a side, which is ok.

I never posted you were wrong. You are purposely over reacting. My guess is because my point about being a fanboy and picking sides dug at you. There was really no need to quote me initially.

Then you cut out a piece of my post to change it then you bring up the color of people in the betting line. now, as you usually do, you are trying to shift the debate to something else.

Is what it is.

the bold is a refutation of my claim that i was there to see floyd mayweather.

and then there was the whole "quite possibly tyhere to see him lose" business, which, if it's not a red herring, i don't know what it is, or what purpose it serves.


just admit that it hruts your case to know that i'm nota fanboy, and you'rey trying to paint me as a fanboy. or are you dumber than you look and not realizing this?

[New England]

is this directed at me? if so and you honestly think when I posted the word debate that it was referring to the sidebar you deflected to then you are truly ******.

I was referring to the debate relative to the thread topic only. I didn't see or respond to your post when I initially posted so I don't know what points you made.

now you are making up something and arguing it, another thing you do a lot.

refer to the bold in my post previous to this, where you 100% and inarguably do what i'm accusing you of doing, which is tell me why i went to see floyd fight.


again, what you're doing is trying to paint me as biased, and it is not working . you're literally trying to tell me why i went to see floyd fight, and why i "possibly" went to see him fight

[The Big Dunn]

the bold is a refutation of my claim that i was there to see floyd mayweather.

and then there was the whole "quite possibly tyhere to see him lose" business, which, if it's not a red herring, i don't know what it is, or what purpose it serves.


just admit that it hruts your case to know that i'm nota fanboy, and you'rey trying to paint me as a fanboy. or are you dumber than you look and not realizing this?

Here is where you are completely missing my point. Saying you were there for the fight implies you were there as a fan, it wasn't intended to be negative or contradictory in any way.

I will consider wording posts differently in the future so as not to offend or cloud my point.

I also posted when you engage in the same stuff as others that you label fanboy I can't see how you are any different.

I will continue to be a diehard Floyd fan without apology. It in no way makes me less of a fan of the sport of boxing except in debates on NSB where somehow watching and supporting the sport is negated if you like Floyd or respond to posts with facts to refute the post.

Again, your position doesn't hurt me in any way. you not liking Floyd or liking whomever doesn't bother me. I don't even understand why you responded to my initial post other then to call what I called garbage a cherrypick.

[New England]

Here is where you are completely missing my point. Saying you were there for the fight implies you were there as a fan, it wasn't intended to be negative or contradictory in any way.

I will consider wording posts differently in the future so as not to offend or cloud my point.

I also posted when you engage in the same stuff as others that you label fanboy I can't see how you are any different.

I will continue to be a diehard Floyd fan without apology. It in no way makes me less of a fan of the sport of boxing except in debates on NSB where somehow watching and supporting the sport is negated if you like Floyd or respond to posts with facts to refute the post.

Again, your position doesn't hurt me in any way. you not liking Floyd or liking whomever doesn't bother me. I don't even understand why you responded to my initial post other then to call what I called garbage a cherrypick.

you keep acting like you have a point when you very blatantly tried to tell me what motivated me to go to floyd canelo, and took about 5 pages to agree with me that you are doing it


are you a die hard pacquiao fan? because i'm a die hard fan of both guys, and you're going to look awfully silly if you try and convince anybody on NSB that you are a die hard pacquiao fan.


short version; we all have biases, but you're much more of a fanboy of floyd than i am of manny by any objective criterion.