Tweet
I use that as an example because I can still give him a pass because it's his last fight. And I can also say that he can get a pass because he just fought Pacquiao. He deserves to have an off fight.
See how I can do that?
The point I'm making is that both Pacquiao and Mayweather are guilty of cherry picking and ducking. What rubs me the wrong way is that most people give Pacquiao a pass or choose to ignore it or are too dumb to notice it, and then they crucify Mayweather or act like Mayweather's the only boxer in the history of boxing to cherry pick or duck, when it's been going on for years.
It's the persona of Mayweather is what it is. Mayweather's the evil, bad guy, while Pacquiao is the church going, goody goddy. Even though Pacquiao had a ******** problem, drinking problem, cheated on his wife. But we'll just ignore that right?
See how I can do that?
The point I'm making is that both Pacquiao and Mayweather are guilty of cherry picking and ducking. What rubs me the wrong way is that most people give Pacquiao a pass or choose to ignore it or are too dumb to notice it, and then they crucify Mayweather or act like Mayweather's the only boxer in the history of boxing to cherry pick or duck, when it's been going on for years.
It's the persona of Mayweather is what it is. Mayweather's the evil, bad guy, while Pacquiao is the church going, goody goddy. Even though Pacquiao had a ******** problem, drinking problem, cheated on his wife. But we'll just ignore that right?
It's called "cognitive dissonance". I think most people are guilty of it on some level but I totally understand your point.
Comment