Comments Thread For: Malignaggi Rips Judge Schreck: He Writes Score Before Fight Starts

[mathed]

Paulie, was Schreck also on da roids like Pac? Punk ass Jersey shore guido looking loud mouth mofo.

[jmrf4435]

Frampton won it clean. Stop it please

[Cinci Champ]

I'm surprised to hear Paulie say this, he seemed quite biased towards Frampton. I figured just from his commentary that he would agree with a scorecard like that.

9-3 is unfair to Santa Cruz. I can easily find 4 clear rounds he won. Maybe that's it, but he definitely won that much.

well he did say frampton clearly won but it was closer then 117-111 thats for sure

[Dinamita 03]

Why must all close fights be scored 7-5 either way? That's ridiculous given that it's scored on a round by round basis and not as a whole at the end of the fight.

[Combat Talk Radio]

“He (Schreck) got me with 117-111 card too with Broner. I think he fills it out before the fight starts and then he watches it, goes to the bathroom, I don’t know. 117-111 is a Tom Schreck fight one way or another if its close or not.”

As hilarious as this is...Broner schooled you, dude.

[asgarth]

Why must all close fights be scored 7-5 either way? That's ridiculous given that it's scored on a round by round basis and not as a whole at the end of the fight.

Because it was a close fight. A competitive fight, where one guy is always game, but doesnt win rounds can end up 12-0 for the other guy.

Thurman Vs Porter was a close fight, a 9-3 card for that fight would have been ridiculous and people would have screamed robbery.

Walters Vs Sosa was a competitive fight, but should have ended with a 10-0 or 9-1 scorecard.


If the rounds were that close judges should use 10-10 rounds, if I recall correctly judges used them more frequently decade(s) ago.

With the 9-3 scorecards, Santa Cruz could have won another 2 rounds and would still lose on points.