Loma will get their but ATM he is not p4p top ten: He has the skills lacks resume

[therealpugilist]

He tries to turn all non related threads to GGG into a Golovkin thread he doesn't realize how much he is advertising for this guy I hope G pays him well.

step yor troll game up....you guys have fell off


post a list and tell why you picked your top ten guys....otherwise you'll be ignored. Just two spinless trolls who never bring anything to a thread

Take some tips from Spoon23...that guy has skills....you two are in the stoneage of trolls

[Rip Chudd]

see people dont even realize what p4p means anymore. the idea of pound for pound is not who u have fought when u have fought its only supposed to mean at this moment in time who is the best p4p. i dont know its just my opinion but u got guys like ward, ggg, lomo etc being punished for resume and i get that train of thought but it is not what p4p is supposed to be.

I get what you're saying but it's impossible to determine without factoring in resume. We need to know how good a fighter looks against the other best fighters. If not I could go look spectacular fighting 70 bums in a row and make the P4P list. There is a reason a guy like Wilder isn't on any respectable p4p list because although he has knocked out all but one opponent, he has only 1 good win on his resume. If we don't factor that in you could say he is p4p #1 because with his power in any division all he has to do is touch you and it's over

[therealpugilist]

Oh man, if I cared more I would find the post from not long ago where realpugilist had Loma in his p4p top 10. This was like a month or two ago as part of one of his many "Golovkin isn't p4p top 20" rants.

just like I thought, you a spineless troll


grow a pair, post a list, support it with stats, why you picked them and we can talk boxing

if you cant, move right along. Go take some tips from Spoon23...at least when he trolls, the guy actually brings in facts and stats.

until then you're just another Pussie in my eyes...you and Butt Buddy Son of Fraud probably beat off to videos together....weirdo

[therealpugilist]

I get what you're saying but it's impossible to determine without factoring in resume. We need to know how good a fighter looks against the other best fighters. If not I could go look spectacular fighting 70 bums in a row and make the P4P list. There is a reason a guy like Wilder isn't on any respectable p4p list because although he has knocked out all but one opponent, he has only 1 good win on his resume. If we don't factor that in you could say he is p4p #1 because with his power in any division all he has to do is touch you and it's over

newbies try to dilute the importance of level of competition because fighters they may favor have weak resumes

gotta be consistent though. To be the best you have to beat the best and you are right. You cant put wilder up there with say Kovalev...Kovalev is just as dominant as Wilder but he dominates a higher calibre of fighters and should be recognized for it.

[j0zef]

Oh man, if I cared more I would find the post from not long ago where realpugilist had Loma in his p4p top 10. This was like a month or two ago as part of one of his many "Golovkin isn't p4p top 20" rants.

He tries to turn all non related threads to GGG into a Golovkin thread he doesn't realize how much he is advertising for this guy I hope G pays him well.

:

[xhiddenx87]

to me P4P is a made up list, that consist on skills.....so that would mean the "eye test"

Resume helps but everybody knows thats styles makes fights, so boxers can lose to a certain fighter, I dont se that as a bad thing. But everybody here uses the losses to justify why one boxer is better than the other, and it dont work like that IMO.

[therealpugilist]

:

spineless troll number 3

knew i'd see you and your butt buddies. Do you guys follow each other around the forum or is it one guy with a dozen alts. Quite impressive how you guys are always in the same threads

[j0zef]

spineless troll number 3

knew i'd see you and your butt buddies. Do you guys follow each other around the forum or is it one guy with a dozen alts. Quite impressive how you guys are always in the same threads

Kid, you've been proven wrong and caught lying over and over and over again yet you somehow keep thinking you're right. Your posts are here for entertainment value, not to be taken seriously.

You should think about it though. You know "Golovkin" poster? I'm 99% certain that he's some hater's alt who came up with a genius plan of posting things so insanely dumb that people think all Golovkin fans are like him - complete and utter morons.

Why do I bring him up? Because I think you're exact opposite. You turn every thread into something Golovkin related (free ads), and you post things so ******ed that people think that all Golovkin haters are this dumb, so they become GGG fans. In other words, there's 50% chance that you are Maxi's alt.

[SilverMiles]

Level of opposition and dominance should be the only criteria by which fighters are ranked. Everything else is subjective.

I think Loma is top 10 skills wise, but I don't think defeats should be erased.

I also don't think past victories have an expiration date.

Technically everything is subjective in boxing, even the fighters you have beaten.

[therealpugilist]

Kid, you've been proven wrong and caught lying over and over and over again yet you somehow keep thinking you're right. Your posts are here for entertainment value, not to be taken seriously.

You should think about it though. You know "Golovkin" poster? I'm 99% certain that he's some hater's alt who came up with a genius plan of posting things so insanely dumb that people think all Golovkin fans are like him - complete and utter morons.

Why do I bring him up? Because I think you're exact opposite. You turn every thread into something Golovkin related (free ads), and you post things so ******ed that people think that all Golovkin haters are this dumb, so they become GGG fans. In other words, there's 50% chance that you are Maxi's alt.

blah, blah...blah...blah..blah


when you type its like charlie brown's mom talking...you aint saying ****


how about speak on the topic in the thread

if you are upset I crapped on you in the past, get over it


never brought up GGG string, some one else did and I answered a question


oh I get it, your period just came on and you're in your feelings.


Go get a pad from your man, GGG....the can man..."any can, can get it!!!"