Yeah. God forbid I use whats supposed ro be a trustworthy reference like Box Rec for info from fights I haven't seen. I should rather quit my job, put my kid up for adoption, and devote my life to watching every fight of every one of GGG past opponents to avoid making this same mistake again. GTFOH and get a life
Listen to me boy, I may disagree with you but I'll die for what you belive in. You're totally entitled to spend your money on a bummy Middleweight fight. Where's Kell Brook ranked in the division though?.
If you're going to come on this forum and try to post your opinion of it being a 'great' match up, back it up with facts or at least a hypothesis. You come across like you're interning for Matchroom.
both unbeaten, both world class fighters, both similar size. its a great, intriguing match up, will GGG look good against a world class fighter, will brook be able to transer his skills from welter to middleweight, will GGG be affected by the crowd. People say 'oh brooks unproven at middle' well do you lot know for a 'fact' that hes going to be a load of **** at middleweight? No. fighters go up and down all the time, its not the big ****ing deal you lot make it to be, and thats why its not a big deal GGG having to go to supermiddle and his legacy doesnt depend on it despite what you clowns say.
both unbeaten, both world class fighters, both similar size. its a great, intriguing match up, will GGG look good against a world class fighter, will brook be able to transer his skills from welter to middleweight, will GGG be affected by the crowd. People say 'oh brooks unproven at middle' well do you lot know for a 'fact' that hes going to be a load of **** at middleweight? No. fighters go up and down all the time, its not the big ****ing deal you lot make it to be, and thats why its not a big deal GGG having to go to supermiddle and his legacy doesnt depend on it despite what you clowns say.
There is nothing great or intriguing about this fight, you're misleading the people that visit this forum. Anyways good luck to both fighters.
There is nothing great or intriguing about this fight, you're misleading the people that visit this forum. Anyways good luck to both fighters.
im not misleading posters. Why have you all taken it for granted that brook is not going to be any good at middleweight? I dont know why youve all taken that as fact. Saw last weekend frampton stepping up fighting someone bigger than him and beating him at his own game. A small size difference makes **** all difference.
im not misleading posters. Why have you all taken it for granted that brook is not going to be any good at middleweight? I dont know why youve all taken that as fact. Saw last weekend frampton stepping up fighting someone bigger than him and beating him at his own game. A small size difference makes **** all difference.
Frampton moved up 4 pounds. Prior to his fight with Quigg he alluded to moving up in weight because he was struggling to make it. Being dropped twice on his US debut was an illustration of that, he was going down partially because he was drained.
After Kell Brooks last fight he was mulling over fighting Thurman or Garcia. Now all of a sudden he's too big for the division. So instead of him going to the next weight class he goes up 13 pounds to fight a knockout specialist. Does fighting Porter prepare you for GGG?.
I wish them nothing but good luck and hopefully it's a good spectacle.
Really? A shot Bute who just got busted on PEDS, and a completely unproven Smith is better than a lemieux, murray, geale?
And who says these guys fight him? It's not worth GGG abandoning his goal to become undisputed for bute, Smith or the dirrell brothers.
A so called shot Bute is still better than anyone on GGG resume, and Lemeiux, Murray or Geale aren't world beater, I do fill Smith is better than them.
Comment