Comments Thread For: Kell Brook: I Would Beat Every Fighter on Golovkin's Record!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • KingHippo
    Undisputed Champion
    • Jun 2016
    • 3457
    • 168
    • 40
    • 38,705

    #131
    Originally posted by GGG Gloveking
    Yeah. God forbid I use whats supposed ro be a trustworthy reference like Box Rec for info from fights I haven't seen. I should rather quit my job, put my kid up for adoption, and devote my life to watching every fight of every one of GGG past opponents to avoid making this same mistake again. GTFOH and get a life
    You're polluting the forum with your fanaticism

    We're here to talk boxing

    Comment

    • GGG Gloveking
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Apr 2016
      • 12382
      • 658
      • 193
      • 189,439

      #132
      Originally posted by KingHippo
      You're polluting the forum with your fanaticism

      We're here to talk boxing
      Then talk some boxing... And leave the baseless, pointless insults aside

      Comment

      • Chrismart
        OK Jim...
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Apr 2007
        • 14279
        • 837
        • 1,761
        • 308,493

        #133
        I don't know about that.

        I rate Brook, i think he's the best WW around, and that he would be competitive with the top guys at 154. At 160 though? I have my doubts.

        Comment

        • KingHippo
          Undisputed Champion
          • Jun 2016
          • 3457
          • 168
          • 40
          • 38,705

          #134
          Originally posted by GGG Gloveking
          Then talk some boxing... And leave the baseless, pointless insults aside
          I never insulted you, just responded with facts.

          You're the one talking about fights you've never seen.

          Comment

          • GGG Gloveking
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Apr 2016
            • 12382
            • 658
            • 193
            • 189,439

            #135
            Originally posted by KingHippo
            I never insulted you, just responded with facts.

            You're the one talking about fights you've never seen.
            I know...Im the ONLY one that has ever gone to BoxRec for info on a fight I didnt happen to see.

            Comment

            • Madison Boxing
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jul 2015
              • 35364
              • 6,455
              • 3,367
              • 190,590

              #136
              Originally posted by StudentOfDaGame
              Listen to me boy, I may disagree with you but I'll die for what you belive in. You're totally entitled to spend your money on a bummy Middleweight fight. Where's Kell Brook ranked in the division though?.

              If you're going to come on this forum and try to post your opinion of it being a 'great' match up, back it up with facts or at least a hypothesis. You come across like you're interning for Matchroom.
              both unbeaten, both world class fighters, both similar size. its a great, intriguing match up, will GGG look good against a world class fighter, will brook be able to transer his skills from welter to middleweight, will GGG be affected by the crowd. People say 'oh brooks unproven at middle' well do you lot know for a 'fact' that hes going to be a load of **** at middleweight? No. fighters go up and down all the time, its not the big ****ing deal you lot make it to be, and thats why its not a big deal GGG having to go to supermiddle and his legacy doesnt depend on it despite what you clowns say.

              Comment

              • REMOVE SHARK 55
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • May 2013
                • 2296
                • 171
                • 1,019
                • 10,832

                #137
                Originally posted by chris232
                both unbeaten, both world class fighters, both similar size. its a great, intriguing match up, will GGG look good against a world class fighter, will brook be able to transer his skills from welter to middleweight, will GGG be affected by the crowd. People say 'oh brooks unproven at middle' well do you lot know for a 'fact' that hes going to be a load of **** at middleweight? No. fighters go up and down all the time, its not the big ****ing deal you lot make it to be, and thats why its not a big deal GGG having to go to supermiddle and his legacy doesnt depend on it despite what you clowns say.
                There is nothing great or intriguing about this fight, you're misleading the people that visit this forum. Anyways good luck to both fighters.

                Comment

                • Madison Boxing
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jul 2015
                  • 35364
                  • 6,455
                  • 3,367
                  • 190,590

                  #138
                  Originally posted by StudentOfDaGame
                  There is nothing great or intriguing about this fight, you're misleading the people that visit this forum. Anyways good luck to both fighters.
                  im not misleading posters. Why have you all taken it for granted that brook is not going to be any good at middleweight? I dont know why youve all taken that as fact. Saw last weekend frampton stepping up fighting someone bigger than him and beating him at his own game. A small size difference makes **** all difference.

                  Comment

                  • REMOVE SHARK 55
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • May 2013
                    • 2296
                    • 171
                    • 1,019
                    • 10,832

                    #139
                    Originally posted by chris232
                    im not misleading posters. Why have you all taken it for granted that brook is not going to be any good at middleweight? I dont know why youve all taken that as fact. Saw last weekend frampton stepping up fighting someone bigger than him and beating him at his own game. A small size difference makes **** all difference.
                    Frampton moved up 4 pounds. Prior to his fight with Quigg he alluded to moving up in weight because he was struggling to make it. Being dropped twice on his US debut was an illustration of that, he was going down partially because he was drained.

                    After Kell Brooks last fight he was mulling over fighting Thurman or Garcia. Now all of a sudden he's too big for the division. So instead of him going to the next weight class he goes up 13 pounds to fight a knockout specialist. Does fighting Porter prepare you for GGG?.

                    I wish them nothing but good luck and hopefully it's a good spectacle.

                    Comment

                    • r1onnie2
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Feb 2016
                      • 1286
                      • 22
                      • 0
                      • 8,471

                      #140
                      Originally posted by casualfan
                      Really? A shot Bute who just got busted on PEDS, and a completely unproven Smith is better than a lemieux, murray, geale?

                      And who says these guys fight him? It's not worth GGG abandoning his goal to become undisputed for bute, Smith or the dirrell brothers.
                      A so called shot Bute is still better than anyone on GGG resume, and Lemeiux, Murray or Geale aren't world beater, I do fill Smith is better than them.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP