Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Bradley Warns: Crawford Can Win, But Pacquiao is NO Postol

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by Boxing Goat View Post
    Floyd was arguably defeated and as I said, Pac was fighter of the decade and it was voted on by a lot more credible boxing experts than some nitwit fan boy. (you) Manny has a lot tougher resume against top fighters while they were in or closer to their primes. Crawl back in your hole.
    Are you still here embarrassing yourself?

    Yes we've already acknowledged Pacquiao's decade award. Roy Jones has the same award for the 90's.

    Keep telling yourself that Manny has a better resume but the facts say he doesn't:

    Mayweather (49-0) (Only undefeated 4 or 5 Division Champion)
    26-0 in world title fights
    23-0 in Lineal title fights
    24-0 against former/current world champs (22 opponents)
    Took titles from 11 of those 22 former/current world champion opponents

    Pacquiao (58-6-2) (Only 8 Division Champion)
    15-3-2 in world title fights
    21-5-2 against former/current world champs (20 opponents)
    Took titles from 8 of those 20 former/current world champion opponents

    Mayweather fought his 1st former/current world champion in his 18th career fight and 1st title fight so that means that 22 of his last 32 career fights was against a former/current world champion.

    Pacquiao fought his 1st former/current world champion in his 25th career fight and 1st title fight so that means that 20 of his 42 career fights was against a former/current world champion.

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by WesternChamp View Post
      well, maybe you should have quoted him with those numbers then..

      we've already witness that against lesser opponents. lets see how he does when he steps up in competition.
      maybe Crawford should see if Rios and Algieri are available.

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by Mr. Luthor View Post
        Like millions of others, I saw that fight over a year ago and the result is still the same.....Mayweather won. Only fools are still getting in boxing discussions saying "Pacquaio arguably won", "Pacquiao's hands are too fast for Compubox" and "Please watch an obscure video that is irrelevant".
        Good, so if you watched the video, you too know that Floyd was clearly out landed. And for the record, I never said Floyd didn't win or that it was even disputed. Of course that doesn't bother me as I know that if Pacquiao didn't have a torn rotator cuff, the results would have been a lot different.

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by Boxing Goat View Post
          Good, so if you watched the video, you too know that Floyd was clearly out landed. And for the record, I never said Floyd didn't win or that it was even disputed. Of course that doesn't bother me as I know that if Pacquiao didn't have a torn rotator cuff, the results would have been a lot different.
          And yet the official punch stats show Mayweather out-landing Pacquiao by about 60 punches. Somehow all the commentators, analysts, media and judges somehow missed all of those punches Pacquiao landed. Hilarious.

          Quite a few "if's" in your statement. But you forgot one more....

          "If Pacquiao had actually landed the punches you claim he did, he would have actually won the fight."

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by Mr. Luthor View Post
            maybe Crawford should see if Rios and Algieri are available.
            maybe he should... AFTER stepping up in competition first

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by Mr. Luthor View Post
              Are you still here embarrassing yourself?

              Yes we've already acknowledged Pacquiao's decade award. Roy Jones has the same award for the 90's.

              Keep telling yourself that Manny has a better resume but the facts say he doesn't:

              Mayweather (49-0) (Only undefeated 4 or 5 Division Champion)
              26-0 in world title fights
              23-0 in Lineal title fights
              24-0 against former/current world champs (22 opponents)
              Took titles from 11 of those 22 former/current world champion opponents

              Pacquiao (58-6-2) (Only 8 Division Champion)
              15-3-2 in world title fights
              21-5-2 against former/current world champs (20 opponents)
              Took titles from 8 of those 20 former/current world champion opponents

              Mayweather fought his 1st former/current world champion in his 18th career fight and 1st title fight so that means that 22 of his last 32 career fights was against a former/current world champion.

              Pacquiao fought his 1st former/current world champion in his 25th career fight and 1st title fight so that means that 20 of his 42 career fights was against a former/current world champion.
              First, LOL @ ALT ACCT's.....

              Next, keep fooling yourself and trust me, thoroughly embarrassing yourself with thinking that sheer numbers or the disputed, undefeated record is all that is considered when ranking a fighters greatness. If that was the case, Joe Calzaghe would be ranked ahead of Roy Jones and anybody who has any real boxing knowledge knows that's not the case.

              Thanks for the signature.

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by Mr. Luthor View Post
                And yet the official punch stats show Mayweather out-landing Pacquiao by about 60 punches. Somehow all the commentators, analysts, media and judges somehow missed all of those punches Pacquiao landed. Hilarious.

                Quite a few "if's" in your statement. But you forgot one more....

                "If Pacquiao had actually landed the punches you claim he did, he would have actually won the fight."
                I don't just claim anything, there's video proof. Again, if you don't want to look it up and verify for yourself, shut the f@ck up.

                Comment


                • #78
                  Originally posted by Boxing Goat View Post
                  First, LOL @ ALT ACCT's.....

                  Next, keep fooling yourself and trust me, thoroughly embarrassing yourself with thinking that sheer numbers or the disputed, undefeated record is all that is considered when ranking a fighters greatness. If that was the case, Joe Calzaghe would be ranked ahead of Roy Jones and anybody who has any real boxing knowledge knows that's not the case.

                  Thanks for the signature.
                  Sheer facts placed Mayweather ahead of Pacquiao. Just like facts of the results of May 2nd 2015.

                  Give us another laugh and tell us again how in Pacquiao's 65th career fight, his hands became too fast for Compubox.
                  Last edited by Mr. Luthor; 07-29-2016, 02:31 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Originally posted by Boxing Goat View Post
                    I don't just claim anything, there's video proof. Again, if you don't want to look it up and verify for yourself, shut the f@ck up.
                    There are official punch stats. Are you new to boxing?
                    Last edited by Mr. Luthor; 07-29-2016, 02:31 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by Mr. Luthor View Post
                      maybe Crawford should see if Rios and Algieri are available.
                      Pac should see how his punch stats look against Dierry Jean or Hammerin' Hank.

                      Bahahaha!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP