Of course Crawford can beat the part time politician, part time fighter. Bradley beat PAC and who'd have thought that could happen? If PAC can be robbed once, he can be twice
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Bradley Warns: Crawford Can Win, But Pacquiao is NO Postol
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Mr. Luthor View PostExactly. You can't be ranked ahead of the boxer, Mayweather, that beat you and is universally recognized as the best boxer of the era that you fought/fight in. Mayweather being the best of Pacquiao's era, by definition ranks him higher.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hugh grant View PostOf course Crawford can beat the part time politician, part time fighter. Bradley beat PAC and who'd have thought that could happen? If PAC can be robbed once, he can be twice
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mr. Luthor View PostGood analysis by Bradley but I do not expect Pacquiao to get in the ring with Crawford. Crawford's abilities are far too great a threat to Pacquiao's defensive liabilities.
Pac ain't no floyd or Pea but he ain't no punching bag either.
Sometimes I think u ppl don't know that the more offensive you are the more you get hit regardless of defense.
It's defensive boxers who rarely get hit. Offensive guys do no matter how good their D is.
Hell crawford probably got hit more these last few years than pac has.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boxing Goat View PostNothing you say about what I say disqualifies me boy, watch your mouth.
I comprehend plenty. You are just drinking the Bud-Aid sauce. Pac is an ATG and has a lot more on his record than one good win over Lucas Mattysse.
Go search on this website proof that Manny landed more punches than Floyd.
There is a video slowing down every punch in the entire fight and it shows Manny landed more. The Compubox guys just can't keep that close of an eye on Manny's punches due to his hand speed. Come back after watching and we will talk then. Let's see if you still think I'm disqualified.
"The Compubox guys just can't keep that close of an eye on Manny's punches due to his hand speed."
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boxing Goat View PostPac was ranked the fighter of the last decade FYILast edited by Mr. Luthor; 07-29-2016, 09:46 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View PostLol defensive liabilities
Pac ain't no floyd or Pea but he ain't no punching bag either.
Sometimes I think u ppl don't know that the more offensive you are the more you get hit regardless of defense.
It's defensive boxers who rarely get hit. Offensive guys do no matter how good their D is.
Hell crawford probably got hit more these last few years than pac has.
Your belief about more offensive boxers taking more punishment has some validity but quite a few offensive boxers do not get hit as much as others like the current version of Pacquiao. For example (as of Feb 2016):
On Average
Kovalev lands 17 punches/round while getting hit 6 times
Golovkin lands 28 punches/round while getting hit 11 times
Santa Cruz lands 32 punches/round while getting hit 14 times
Pacquiao lands 21 punches/round while getting hit 12 times
You would be wrong about Crawford and Pacquiao because on average.....
Crawford lands 17 punches/round while getting hit 7 times.
(These averages were based were at least 5 fights of championship caliber opponents.)
Comment
-
Comment