Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Bradley Warns: Crawford Can Win, But Pacquiao is NO Postol

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Of course Crawford can beat the part time politician, part time fighter. Bradley beat PAC and who'd have thought that could happen? If PAC can be robbed once, he can be twice

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by Mr. Luthor View Post
      Exactly. You can't be ranked ahead of the boxer, Mayweather, that beat you and is universally recognized as the best boxer of the era that you fought/fight in. Mayweather being the best of Pacquiao's era, by definition ranks him higher.
      Pac was ranked the fighter of the last decade FYI

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by Mr. Luthor View Post
        The odds of Pacquiao KO-ing Crawford are the same odds of Brook KO-ing Golovkin.
        Welcome to my signature LOL!

        Comment


        • #54
          Craw eat his As5s alive.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
            Of course Crawford can beat the part time politician, part time fighter. Bradley beat PAC and who'd have thought that could happen? If PAC can be robbed once, he can be twice
            what robbery you talking about elizabeth? Bradley won that fight fair and square. Even their compubox was a comedy when you look at number of punches claimed to be landed by Pac. To see what a robbery is watch Marquez vs PAc 2 and 3 and check how the judges scored it round by round.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by Mr. Luthor View Post
              Good analysis by Bradley but I do not expect Pacquiao to get in the ring with Crawford. Crawford's abilities are far too great a threat to Pacquiao's defensive liabilities.
              Lol defensive liabilities
              Pac ain't no floyd or Pea but he ain't no punching bag either.

              Sometimes I think u ppl don't know that the more offensive you are the more you get hit regardless of defense.

              It's defensive boxers who rarely get hit. Offensive guys do no matter how good their D is.

              Hell crawford probably got hit more these last few years than pac has.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by Boxing Goat View Post
                Nothing you say about what I say disqualifies me boy, watch your mouth.

                I comprehend plenty. You are just drinking the Bud-Aid sauce. Pac is an ATG and has a lot more on his record than one good win over Lucas Mattysse.

                Go search on this website proof that Manny landed more punches than Floyd.
                There is a video slowing down every punch in the entire fight and it shows Manny landed more. The Compubox guys just can't keep that close of an eye on Manny's punches due to his hand speed. Come back after watching and we will talk then. Let's see if you still think I'm disqualified.
                Stop constantly embarrasing yourself. You're disqualified again due to yet another ridiculously ****** statement:

                "The Compubox guys just can't keep that close of an eye on Manny's punches due to his hand speed."

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by Boxing Goat View Post
                  Pac was ranked the fighter of the last decade FYI
                  the Boxing Writers Association hands out that award and in that particular Decade, Mayweather was not only undefeated while Pacquiao was not, Mayweather was also Top 10 P4P for longer but also #1 P4P more. Now let's see what's more of an accomplishment, being given a writer's award for a decade or being recognized as the best of the generation/era?
                  Last edited by Mr. Luthor; 07-29-2016, 09:46 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
                    Lol defensive liabilities
                    Pac ain't no floyd or Pea but he ain't no punching bag either.

                    Sometimes I think u ppl don't know that the more offensive you are the more you get hit regardless of defense.

                    It's defensive boxers who rarely get hit. Offensive guys do no matter how good their D is.

                    Hell crawford probably got hit more these last few years than pac has.
                    No one said Pacquiao was a punching bag but he certainly has defensive liabilites and they do get exposed by technically sound boxers with counter-punching skills like Crawford possesses.

                    Your belief about more offensive boxers taking more punishment has some validity but quite a few offensive boxers do not get hit as much as others like the current version of Pacquiao. For example (as of Feb 2016):
                    On Average
                    Kovalev lands 17 punches/round while getting hit 6 times
                    Golovkin lands 28 punches/round while getting hit 11 times
                    Santa Cruz lands 32 punches/round while getting hit 14 times
                    Pacquiao lands 21 punches/round while getting hit 12 times

                    You would be wrong about Crawford and Pacquiao because on average.....
                    Crawford lands 17 punches/round while getting hit 7 times.

                    (These averages were based were at least 5 fights of championship caliber opponents.)

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by Adonis Creed View Post
                      Tim is much better the Crawford they're cool with each other so he won't say it. Crawford has better pop in his punches and that's it.
                      Crawford does everything better than Timmy..put them in the ring together and you'll see.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP