Crawford vs Postol = Lara vs Golovkin

[-PBP-]

This is the worst comparison of all time

[boxinggod101]

Don't feel salty my son. Try and write both left handed and right handed and time yourself after finishing the paragraph. Show some respect to Crawford for bozo'ing Postol all night as a Southpaw. That's the reason why Postol had no gameplan. Lara boxes circles on Golovkin. I know boxing.

I give all respect to Crawford. Hes now a top 5 P4P thats for sure. Hes above GGG thats another thing for sure.

Ur comparison is just dumb. Nothing less nothing more.

For someone who ****s on everything GGG does, u should **** on Wilder too.They have the same kind of resume. Full of easy fights with alot of KO. Both of them never beat any real threat and shouldnt be consider P4P material. Both overrated until they prove otherwise, right?

[Lester Tutor]

GGG can actually punch and is a pressure fighter. Postol is always the taller guy and is an arm puncher. He will never be close to the knockout artist that GGG is. He got lucky against Matthysse.

Matthysse is not a ring owner at the elite level with footwork. He's your in the pocket guy who's good, but not good against boxers with reach. Lucas shouldn't even be mentioned.

Context = Lara (Southpaw style) and movement.

[_original_]

Postol is a better boxer so it'd be even worse.

[CaneloMaidana]

Yep, it's why Golovkin refuses to fight slick fighters.

[Derranged]

I give all respect to Crawford. Hes now a top 5 P4P thats for sure. Hes above GGG thats another thing for sure.

Ur comparison is just dumb. Nothing less nothing more.

For someone who ****s on everything GGG does, u should **** on Wilder too.They have the same kind of resume. Full of easy fights with alot of KO. Both of them never beat any real threat and shouldnt be consider P4P material. Both overrated until they prove otherwise, right?

Sugarkainehook is a jackass, there's no point in arguing with him. He'll probably respond to this comment with "You mad? or "you sound salty" or some other idiotic social media catch phrase.

[asgarth]

Thats not a good comparison.

Postol fights nothing like GGG. He fights tall and rangy and is normally the guy on the move keeping his opponents at the end of the jab. This time he had to fight against his normal style and be the aggressor, which he cant do very effectively. (lack of cutting of the ring, basic 1.2, lack of inside fighting skills)

GGG on the other hand knows how to trap his opponent and is very effective going forward.

Even though Crawford used the hit and move style he still outworked and outlanded postol and commited on his punches.
Lara is much more negative and never engages and commits on his punches.

[Baltimore]

Are you saying that Golovkin is only as good as cutting off a ring as Postol is???

[Combat Talk Radio]

Don't feel salty my son. Try and write both left handed and right handed and time yourself after finishing the paragraph. Show some respect to Crawford for bozo'ing Postol all night as a Southpaw. That's the reason why Postol had no gameplan. Lara boxes circles on Golovkin. I know boxing.

I'm going to go out on a limb and say you can't know boxing if you seriously believe that stylistically it would go the same.

Golovkin will NOT sit back and wait on a jab.
Golovkin is MUCH better at cutting off the ring.
Golovkin has WAY more power.

Given those three, Crawford could not use the same technique to beat Lil G. He'd have to keep switching stance to throw G off and then catch him with something, likely to the body, without getting hit.

I'm not saying it would be a one-sided affair, but Postol is to G what Ortiz is to Duran. Not even in the same class.

[Madison Boxing]

you sound like one of them idiots who used to always say that mayweather was ducking southpaws cause he had a few minor problems with judah early on.