Crawford should be ranked ahead of GGG p4p right?

[Szef]

Crawford is Unified and 2 division. Yep. Golovkin isn't p4p.

Which makes the fact that you low IQ idiots can't stop talking about this terminal disease even more pathetic and hilarious. FOH f*ggot.

[Pigeons]

Which makes the fact that you low IQ idiots can't stop talking about this terminal disease even more pathetic and hilarious. FOH f*ggot.

Szef, tell us why you mad.

[Derranged]

At Larry finding a way to make this latest Crawford win about Golovkin. Your obsession with him is fuckin pathetic, you and the other detractors are worse than the fanboys.

That said, I would have him higher on the P4P list but those lists are subjective anyway, I don't put much stock in them or care that much.

[stuff jones]

Larry's obsessed with GGG. Is it Mayweather related? Everything is Mayweather related for him.

[Hype job]

Who did Crawford beat that was so great? Postol was a top win but their resumes aren't really that different in terms of quality, difference is GGG's been bulldozing his opponents.

[Hype job]

Yes. He has the superior wins and accomplishments and takes high risk, low reward fights.

What are these superior wins exactly?

[-PBP-]

What are these superior wins exactly?

Postol and Gamboa are top wins.

That's what separates him from GGG. Outside of those 2 wins I agree with you, the resumes are a wash.

[Szef]

Szef, tell us why you mad.

Read my first post in this thread, bird man.

Not mad, just frustrated with these trolls' ignorance and ******ity.

[Hype job]

Postol and Gamboa are top wins.

That's what separates him from GGG. Outside of those 2 wins I agree with you, the resumes are a wash.

[-PBP-]

Read my first post in this thread, bird man.

Not mad, just frustrated with these trolls' ignorance and ******ity.

You know you're probably arguing with the same dude, just under different accounts