You can make an argument either way. Personally I have Crawford number 4 behind Chocolatito, Kovalev, and Ward. The man is a 2 division LINEAL champion which means he beat whoever was the top guy in his division.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Crawford should be ranked ahead of GGG p4p right?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by -PBP- View PostPostol and Gamboa are top wins.
That's what separates him from GGG. Outside of those 2 wins I agree with you, the resumes are a wash.
Comment
-
Originally posted by cork View PostHow is Gamboa a good win for Crawford? It's basically the same as GGG vs Brook and I can promise you GGG will get no credit for beating Brook. Postol was a good win but besides that I don't think their resume are much different. To me though GGG looks like the superior boxer and have superior strength.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cork View PostHow is Gamboa a good win for Crawford? It's basically the same as GGG vs Brook and I can promise you GGG will get no credit for beating Brook. Postol was a good win but besides that I don't think their resume are much different. To me though GGG looks like the superior boxer and have superior strength.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by deathofaclown View PostExactly. They called Fury v Klitschko, Fury clearly won that one. They shouldn't be commentating if they're this far wide of the mark
Postol got robbed. I'm not saying he dominated, but i'd say Crawford only clearly won 2 or 3 rounds, plus some lucky flash knockdowns.
Comment
-
Originally posted by -PBP- View PostNo it's not. Gamboa was a special fighter and a ranked lightweight
Comment
-
Originally posted by cork View PostWhat? I was trying to say beating someone two weight class below you should get you no credit. I can't imagine Canelo would get credit if he beats Crawford or if GGG beats Pac or Floyd.
Comment
Comment