Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Crawford should be ranked ahead of GGG p4p right?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    You can make an argument either way. Personally I have Crawford number 4 behind Chocolatito, Kovalev, and Ward. The man is a 2 division LINEAL champion which means he beat whoever was the top guy in his division.

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by -PBP- View Post
      Postol and Gamboa are top wins.

      That's what separates him from GGG. Outside of those 2 wins I agree with you, the resumes are a wash.
      How is Gamboa a good win for Crawford? It's basically the same as GGG vs Brook and I can promise you GGG will get no credit for beating Brook. Postol was a good win but besides that I don't think their resume are much different. To me though GGG looks like the superior boxer and have superior strength.

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by cork View Post
        How is Gamboa a good win for Crawford? It's basically the same as GGG vs Brook and I can promise you GGG will get no credit for beating Brook. Postol was a good win but besides that I don't think their resume are much different. To me though GGG looks like the superior boxer and have superior strength.
        That's because he's fighting no-hopers. Shameful resume at 34. I don't care who he ducked or who ducked him.

        Comment


        • #74
          I thought postol was exposed as one dimensional

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by bluebeam View Post
            I know you weren't sold on bud a while back, but have you come around on him yet?


            his biggest weapon is his ability to adjust
            Yea he earned a fan last night

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by cork View Post
              How is Gamboa a good win for Crawford? It's basically the same as GGG vs Brook and I can promise you GGG will get no credit for beating Brook. Postol was a good win but besides that I don't think their resume are much different. To me though GGG looks like the superior boxer and have superior strength.
              No it's not. Gamboa was a special fighter and a ranked lightweight

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by Triple Genius View Post
                I thought postol was exposed as one dimensional
                Lara's one dimensional but still an excellent fighter. If your very good at your one dimension you can still be an elite fighter

                Comment


                • #78
                  Originally posted by deathofaclown View Post
                  Exactly. They called Fury v Klitschko, Fury clearly won that one. They shouldn't be commentating if they're this far wide of the mark

                  Postol got robbed. I'm not saying he dominated, but i'd say Crawford only clearly won 2 or 3 rounds, plus some lucky flash knockdowns.
                  lol..are you serious?? Postol even knew he got dominated

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Originally posted by -PBP- View Post
                    No it's not. Gamboa was a special fighter and a ranked lightweight
                    What? I was trying to say beating someone two weight class below you should get you no credit. I can't imagine Canelo would get credit if he beats Crawford or if GGG beats Pac or Floyd.

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by cork View Post
                      What? I was trying to say beating someone two weight class below you should get you no credit. I can't imagine Canelo would get credit if he beats Crawford or if GGG beats Pac or Floyd.
                      Gamboa was not 2 divisions below . He was a ranked lightweight and campaigning in that division.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP