You can make an argument either way. Personally I have Crawford number 4 behind Chocolatito, Kovalev, and Ward. The man is a 2 division LINEAL champion which means he beat whoever was the top guy in his division.
Crawford should be ranked ahead of GGG p4p right?
Collapse
-
-
How is Gamboa a good win for Crawford? It's basically the same as GGG vs Brook and I can promise you GGG will get no credit for beating Brook. Postol was a good win but besides that I don't think their resume are much different. To me though GGG looks like the superior boxer and have superior strength.Comment
-
That's because he's fighting no-hopers. Shameful resume at 34. I don't care who he ducked or who ducked him.How is Gamboa a good win for Crawford? It's basically the same as GGG vs Brook and I can promise you GGG will get no credit for beating Brook. Postol was a good win but besides that I don't think their resume are much different. To me though GGG looks like the superior boxer and have superior strength.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
No it's not. Gamboa was a special fighter and a ranked lightweightHow is Gamboa a good win for Crawford? It's basically the same as GGG vs Brook and I can promise you GGG will get no credit for beating Brook. Postol was a good win but besides that I don't think their resume are much different. To me though GGG looks like the superior boxer and have superior strength.Comment
-
lol..are you serious?? Postol even knew he got dominatedExactly. They called Fury v Klitschko, Fury clearly won that one. They shouldn't be commentating if they're this far wide of the mark
Postol got robbed. I'm not saying he dominated, but i'd say Crawford only clearly won 2 or 3 rounds, plus some lucky flash knockdowns.Comment
-
Comment
-
Gamboa was not 2 divisions below . He was a ranked lightweight and campaigning in that division.Comment
Comment