This is why Crawford vs. Postol is PPV and not HBO Championship Boxing
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Good idea
Have 6 PPVs at 20- 40 each with 2-3 good fights or names on it and 12 regular shows a year once a monthComment
-
One of the few upsides to the GGG - Brook fiasco is that it shouldn't cut too deep into the HBO budget, I don't know the financials for Kovalev - Chilemba but I think that was largely Russian funded too (Igor Altushkin) with HBO mainly just picking up a re-broadcast tab... I can see these kind of international collaborations becoming more common as HBO continues to struggle with budgetary constraints. And plenty more PPV in the US of course - you guys might wanna start thinking about online subscriptions to BoxNation...Comment
-
Comment
-
sadly, ill probably buy it... Thats pretty sad for a fight that should have been on regular HBO but I just hate to watch streamsComment
-
Comment
-
I'd feel better about getting this if the opponent for Crawford wasnt a BORING RUNNING coward. Postol has that weak Rocky Martinez style. If it was against an exciting fighter, Id be gucci. But against a lil bish, nah.Comment
-
Comment
-
Ok.
Let's assume HBO is willing to pay Crawford $1.5 million (that is $100,000 more than what Thurman got in the Porter fight) for a non-PPV Postol fight. Would you say it's fair?
Which fight do you think is bigger Thurman vs Porter or Crawford vs Postol?Comment
Comment