"Offered Same Contract To Brook" obviously not a 157 bout...Eubank bout sabotaged?

[hugh grant]

Every person you mentioned except boxer X has gone North... guess which boxer is that? I agree, consistencies and double standards are a beootch, especially when you build hype that 154-168 is easy and then just conveniently say "for right now my focus is 160."

There's no problem with ggg. just wanting to be a great middleweight champion. That's no sin. Ggg is giving critics the chance to show he is overrated if he loses. Lots at stake.
Just like it's alright for brook to be more than just a ww champ. People have criticised brook for not doing much and this is brooks response.
Critics can't have it both ways. Your damped if you don't and damned if u do

[Redd Foxx]

Nobody knows it's a ridiculous fight. People wanted floyd to fight ggg at 160. Floyd didn't want it floyd didn't want brook as well. So ggg and brook getting it on instead.

It's a chance for brook to attain greatness or ggg can be exposed as not as good as people thought. If brook wins then it wouldn't be ridiculous would it? If haggler can fight Sri and Duran and floyd can fight jmm why can't ggg fight brook?
I just want consistency and no double standards. Otherwise I'll think u have beef with ggg

You'd rather these fighters do nothing twiddling thumbs.? That's the alternative or going round in circles like Eubanks unable to find pen?

They were talking big about 168. This was the perfect time to take a fight there, any fight, but they went hard in the opposite direction.

And, don't talk about old-timey fights as if Kell "I had 1 decent fight 2 years ago" Brook is Roberto Duran.

"Nobody knows it's a ridiculous fight" lololol.... Well, apparently a few people do;

"Golovkin vs. Brook Will Be Repeat of Canelo vs. Khan"
-Forbes

"..bookies are among many who expect him to be flattened.."
-DailyMail UK

[Lester Tutor]

There's no problem with ggg. just wanting to be a great middleweight champion. That's no sin. Ggg is giving critics the chance to show he is overrated if he loses. Lots at stake.
Just like it's alright for brook to be more than just a ww champ. People have criticised brook for not doing much and this is brooks response.
Critics can't have it both ways. Your damped if you don't and damned if u do

Speaking of critics, Im tying to figure out why Kevin McRae, who's an auxiliary member of the BWAA, is justifying Golovkin as innocent with the Brook choice. Hauser runs that outfit...conflict of interest? HBO...

Everybody knows Golovkin is a good middleweight champion. So that greatness is proved when saying 154-168 is easy and you bow down to A-side and take a 155 bout. Because 154 is easy remember? Floyd's been gone. Who's the cash cow? Who wants that check? Who said "Canelo is too big.."

You just be the Bside, fight Alvarez if you're that good, and take the belt. If not, you're just pooosie. Taking on 147 Brook but not Alvarez and defending at 160. Golovkin has not once contesting he preferred and insisted he wanted 157 for Brook. For respect.

All fake.

[hugh grant]

They were talking big about 168. This was the perfect time to take a fight there, any fight, but they went hard in the opposite direction.

And, don't talk about old-timey fights as if Kell "I had 1 decent fight 2 years ago" Brook is Roberto Duran.

"Nobody knows it's a ridiculous fight" lololol.... Well, apparently a few people do;

"Golovkin vs. Brook Will Be Repeat of Canelo vs. Khan"
-Forbes

"..bookies are among many who expect him to be flattened.."
-DailyMail UK

Double standards again? What does brook is no Duran mean.? You mean Duran is a lightweight? Ggg is no haggler. The fact that brook is big underdog is no excuse for a fight being silly. I'm sure Duran was big underdog as was jmm.
Ggg isn't that good according to many so I'm sure people who don't think ggg is all that good thinks it's a perfectly acceptable fight

[Lester Tutor]

Ggg isn't that good according to many so I'm sure people who don't think ggg is all that good thinks it's a perfectly acceptable fight

Who says GGG is "not that good?" He has been notoriously criticized for not moving up, or not keeping his word that 154-168 is easy, meaning, fighting top dogs from those divisions..." that's what is being criticized.

that has nothing to do with "not that good." seems like you're trying to justify Golovkin fighting a Welterweight as an acceptable fight because "others" say he's "not that good." smh

[Citizen Koba]

Dear NSB Brothers. Great night of PBC boxing. Wilder and Arreola at least bringing some honor to the game. American Heavyweight stylee. Even today many NSB posters were discontent with Box Nation's commentary... you must wonder if Eubank Sr. knows a thing or two about boxing commentart and wants the best contract for his son knowing that there are many greedy goons in the sport.

Now, for some "siriz beesnis juss"..

"OF COURSE" (Cenk Uygur voice) K2 had no OBJECTIONS with the SAME contract given to Brook. lol

They then said, "Brook Didn't Want 157." Did he actually say that, or because he signed that's what they want the public to believe? Meaning, if you don't sign for the 160 there's no fight. Obviously if Hearn backed up his boy, Brook, by saying "Can We Still Do This At 157?" and K2 says "no..." then it leaves Hearn in a mess to find a replacement or worse, the whole fiasco that he couldn't deliver either fighters and would give Eubank Sr. the opportunity to say "Hearn" declined the bout.

So how does anyone explain the cojones of not submitting to A-Side, boxing's biggest star bet at 155 vs a Welterweight Brook that both Abel (acknowledged at 157), Loeffler, or Gennady stating that such a fight was ridiculous because he's too small?

Here's real life video footage since March of 2016 of these contradictions. Come on man...

I'm not understanding your point. Are you saying Kell requested 157 and was refused? Does it matter? Would 157 make this an acceptable fight?

[Lester Tutor]

I'm not understanding your point. Are you saying Kell requested 157 and was refused? Does it matter? Would 157 make this an acceptable fight?

In March forward, industry and reporters told K2 and team that Brook wanted a 157 bout. Abel heard the news, said sure, "ballsy." Loeffler was skeptic about the realism for such a bout. Gennady, said it was ridiculous that he was "too small, just trash talk..." And that was the context of a 157 catch!

Now everything contradicts those statements, and Gennady is defending at 160 as sanctioned by the WBC, so a 157 bout wouldn't be possible anyways. Now K2 and team are alll justifying fighting a Welterweright.

My theory, Loeffler is doing Hearn the favor so that the Eubank fight didn't go as planned and so they could blame them for the contract mishap.

[HeroBando]

In March forward, industry and reporters told K2 and team that Brook wanted a 157 bout. Abel heard the news, said sure, "ballsy." Loeffler was skeptic about the realism for such a bout. Gennady, said it was ridiculous that he was "too small, just trash talk..." And that was the context of a 157 catch!

Now everything contradicts those statements, and Gennady is defending at 160 as sanctioned by the WBC, so a 157 bout wouldn't be possible anyways. Now K2 and team are alll justifying fighting a Welterweright.

My theory, Loeffler is doing Hearn the favor so that the Eubank fight didn't go as planned and so they could blame them for the contract mishap.

Your thread title makes zero sense, numbskull. Hearn offered the same deal to Brook that Eubank rejected, fcuking duh. Will you start making any sense one of these days?

[eco1]

Dude, for real and this is the last time i tell you:

Seek professional help.

[W. Ledochowski]

Keep going with your laughable videos and biased opinions, praising Wilder-Arreola, ridiculous... Canelo would never fight GGG even at 155, it was just an excuse... He was his mandatory for the Lineal, Ring and WBC 160 Middleweight belts, period...

Yes, Golovkin said that Brook was too small, he was never a choice for him, and the usual suspects were even saying that he was ducking him, because he "called him out" after hearing about Khan vs Canelo...

Unfortunately he had no choice, would you have preferred a bout with maybe Andy Lee? Golovkin had already signed for a fight in the UK, everything was booked, but Eubank Sr ****ed up with silly demands... Brook accepted the deal...

Saunders was unavailable, Degale too because he wants to unify at 168 and is in talk for Badou Jack... Who was Golovkin supposed to fight in early September in the UK? No one of note was available from 154 to 168, and that's a fact...