"Offered Same Contract To Brook" obviously not a 157 bout...Eubank bout sabotaged?

[Weebler I]

Hope Brook withdraws from this farce of a fight (injury or whatever) close to the fight time. Disappointing Eubank is not the opponent.

They're talking about putting on GGG-Eubank at Christmas if he beats Brook.

Of course, Eubank Sr. would have to agree.

[Redd Foxx]

lol ur just making stuff up now. Golovkin said months ago he didn't want a Brook fight, we all read the articles and read NSB posters actually say GGG was ducking Brook lol . He even said again yesterday he didn't want a Brook fight. Golovkin fans didn't want a Brook fight, no one wanted a Brook fight besides Brook himself and everyone wanted Canelo, Saunders, Jacobs or Eubank. K2 took the deal on the table from Hearn because all the guys I mentioned wouldn't fight. Golovkin himself yesterday said he didn't want to fight Brook but he couldn't get anyone else and he was surprised Brook was actually serious.

It is what it is - a mismatch (everyone agrees that it is)that, a mismatch that was made because none of the top middleweights would step up. Could K2 have got a better opponent? Probably, probably would have taken more time searching for someone decent and almost certainly wouldn't have been nearly as lucrative.

All we can hope for is Canelo, Saunders or Jacobs to step up to the plate after Brook, if not then he'll have to look at 168.

Please don't act blind to all the Golovkin hardcores around here suddenly defending Brook and Hearn. Come on. Seriously. THAT is making shyt up.
Regarding the rest, sure, I've never disagreed with most of that but I'm talking about fans on here and about Hearn, not Golovkin himself.

[betmen]

Dear NSB Brothers. Great night of PBC boxing. Wilder and Arreola at least bringing some honor to the game. American Heavyweight stylee. Even today many NSB posters were discontent with Box Nation's commentary... you must wonder if Eubank Sr. knows a thing or two about boxing commentart and wants the best contract for his son knowing that there are many greedy goons in the sport.

Now, for some "siriz beesnis juss"..

"OF COURSE" (Cenk Uygur voice) K2 had no OBJECTIONS with the SAME contract given to Brook. lol

:hahaha::hahaha: cenk uygur, i guess that fat turk is real celebrity

[ИATAS]

Please don't act blind to all the Golovkin hardcores around here suddenly defending Brook and Hearn. Come on. Seriously. THAT is making shyt up.
Regarding the rest, sure, I've never disagreed with most of that but I'm talking about fans on here and about Hearn, not Golovkin himself.

Redd, you know it's the same two or three Golovkin fans, plus one obvious troll on this forum that make those 'in defense of Brook/Golovkin' type threads. There are a ton of GGG fans on here and everyone besides those few posters agree the fight sucks and no one wanted it. To those Golovkin fans that say otherwise, all I say to them is Golovkin literally said he didn't want to fight Brook just yesterday and it's because he is a welterweight.

[_Maxi]

lol ur just making stuff up now. Golovkin said months ago he didn't want a Brook fight, we all read the articles and read NSB posters actually say GGG was ducking Brook lol .

This man, this, LOL.

They went from... Brook would be biggest fight in GGG resume, to "ridiculous fight" hahaha...

They are biased as ****.

[Lester Tutor]

:hahaha::hahaha: cenk uygur, i guess that fat turk is real celebrity

He is fat. I believe the TYT channel is among top 2 innit? I guess that's a "celebrity" as he's worked on CNN. I mean, "Of Course!"

[Lester Tutor]

Redd, you know it's the same two or three Golovkin fans, plus one obvious troll on this forum that make those 'in defense of Brook/Golovkin' type threads. There are a ton of GGG fans on here and everyone besides those few posters agree the fight sucks and no one wanted it. To those Golovkin fans that say otherwise, all I say to them is Golovkin literally said he didn't want to fight Brook just yesterday and it's because he is a welterweight.

Which video he said he literally didn't want?

[Lester Tutor]

Please don't act blind to all the Golovkin hardcores around here suddenly defending Brook and Hearn. Come on. Seriously. THAT is making shyt up.
Regarding the rest, sure, I've never disagreed with most of that but I'm talking about fans on here and about Hearn, not Golovkin himself.

Golovkin is stating, per the video, that the people want the Brook fight.. who's telling him that script? NATAS is saying that Golovkin now doesn't want the fight, yet Golovkin says the fans want the fight, and then he goes on to saying it's an "interesting fight" what does that even mean?. Golovkin is a professional. Clearly he's not an idiot. To criticize Alvarez at 155 yet take a Brook fight.

Fugg out here. K2 getting owned... As i always say, "Karma" honesty, honor, and deception go a long way...

Let them speak, let the editing preach.

[Redd Foxx]

Redd, you know it's the same two or three Golovkin fans, plus one obvious troll on this forum that make those 'in defense of Brook/Golovkin' type threads. There are a ton of GGG fans on here and everyone besides those few posters agree the fight sucks and no one wanted it. To those Golovkin fans that say otherwise, all I say to them is Golovkin literally said he didn't want to fight Brook just yesterday and it's because he is a welterweight.

Fair enough. When those "3 guys" (dozen when you count the alts) flood the forum with thousands of posts hammering home the same, predictable BS, it's easy to generalize "Golovkin fans". I'm sure you know what I'm talking about. But, respect to those who aren't playing the apologist role.

[BoxingIsGreat]

They're talking about putting on GGG-Eubank at Christmas if he beats Brook.

Of course, Eubank Sr. would have to agree.

That'd be nice. Is there a source?