Comments Thread For: Golovkin vs. Brook - WBA Has NOT Sanctioned as Title Fight

[CaneloMaidana]

The WBA could do more to control the situation. They could NOT sanction Jacobs vs. Mora, just like they have NOT sanctioned GGG vs. Brook! I'm still waiting for Jacobs to MAN THE **** UP!!!

Golovkin should man up and move up.

[Scipio2009]

Dude stop talking, you sound like a bigger fool every time.

Your so clueless you don't even realize fights aren't going to be happening in NY after September.

^^^^^^^lol

[Eastcoast]

^^^^^^^lol

Seriously, you've been coming off like a genuine ****** these last two days.

Yesterday you were arguing Danny Garcia was the next Oscar Dela Hoya and that he deserved around parity with Pacquiao. You also claimed Garcia/Broner would net $8-10mill for a site-fee alone.


Today you're arguing that DiBella would bid over $4mill for a Jacobs/Golovkin fight knowing that Golovkin would get 75% of that bid. DiBella/Haymon only bid a little over $5mill for Wilder when he was recieving the A-side of the bid, and now you're claiming they'll bid about that much for Danny Jacobs who in the biggest fight of his career vs Quillin drew 385k tv viewers and sold less than 8,500 tickets in their joint hometown!!! Before they overpaid Jacobs for that failed fight with Quillin, Haymon gave $550k for Jacobs previous biggest payday.

And you're the same joker who runs around saying Golovkin only gets sellouts b/c his ticket prices are so cheap. Newsflash dumbass, Danny Jacobs is headlining a Friday night fight at the Cosmo in LV, where they might sell 2-3k tickets.

Whatever community college you went to, get a lawyer and get you're refund.

[_Maxi]

Of course they don't. I haven't seen one of them that acted like they even read the article. They just cry, "Money doe... "

When we know the fight night weight of Brook fighting at MW, then we can talk.

You speak without facts. Also you don't seem to be very bright if you think that Canelo only had 8 pounds over Khan.

Brook will probably be around 165. Your bias is too much even though you pretend to be neutral.

[Redd Foxx]

When we know the fight night weight of Brook fighting at MW, then we can talk.

You speak without facts. Also you don't seem to be very bright if you think that Canelo only had 8 pounds over Khan.

Brook will probably be around 165. Your bias is too much even though you pretend to be neutral.

I made a statement about people who don't read the article and embarrass themselves by commenting without knowing what was even said. You, ironically, went on to attack me on things I didn't even say. How do you pull Caneo, Khan, or fight night weight from my quote? Seriously.

Ask yourself, how often have you criticized anything GGG has done, or his coach, his team, his opponent, etc. If you're honest about it, you'll realize one of two things;
-that everyone coming in contact with him is blessed with divine judgement
-or that you're ignoring normal human flaws in favor of hero worship

[Scipio2009]

Seriously, you've been coming off like a genuine ****** these last two days.

Yesterday you were arguing Danny Garcia was the next Oscar Dela Hoya and that he deserved around parity with Pacquiao. You also claimed Garcia/Broner would net $8-10mill for a site-fee alone.


Today you're arguing that DiBella would bid over $4mill for a Jacobs/Golovkin fight knowing that Golovkin would get 75% of that bid. DiBella/Haymon only bid a little over $5mill for Wilder when he was recieving the A-side of the bid, and now you're claiming they'll bid about that much for Danny Jacobs who in the biggest fight of his career vs Quillin drew 385k tv viewers and sold less than 8,500 tickets in their joint hometown!!! Before they overpaid Jacobs for that failed fight with Quillin, Haymon gave $550k for Jacobs previous biggest payday.

And you're the same joker who runs around saying Golovkin only gets sellouts b/c his ticket prices are so cheap. Newsflash dumbass, Danny Jacobs is headlining a Friday night fight at the Cosmo in LV, where they might sell 2-3k tickets.

Whatever community college you went to, get a lawyer and get you're refund.

I was making the point that, in the current welterweight world, Danny Garcia is being positioned akin to where De La Hoya was when he was a welterweight. Not my problem that you can't comprehend information; if Brandon Rios was worth $3m to Top Rank, Danny Garcia is worth well more than that for an event.

In making the DiBella comment, it is obviously clear that for DiBella/Barclays Center/Showtime/Haymon, Golovkin-Jacobs is a massive event where'd they have far fewer qualms putting up the money than K2/HBO/Madison Square Garden; the bid won't have to get anywhere near $5m because I doubt that K2, looking at the finances for the fight on their end (what HBO is willing to put up, what they can project as revenue from the gate, etc), is willing to leave the company in position to lose money.

The "king of Brooklyn" facing the 'middleweight king' in Brooklyn is an event onto it's own.

hilarious to see you trying to question someone else's intelligience.

[Motorcity Cobra]

^^^^^^^lol

He gets so offended when people call him out on his BS. He's a parrot of Steve Kim, Michael Montero, Gabe Montoya and Doug Fischer. It's pathetic watching him kiss their ass on Twitter all day trying to get them to retweet him

[Motorcity Cobra]

When your fighter is getting paid in British Pounds you can't afford to win a purse bid in America. Period. Point. Blank.

[Eastcoast]

I was making the point that, in the current welterweight world, Danny Garcia is being positioned akin to where De La Hoya was when he was a welterweight. Not my problem that you can't comprehend information; if Brandon Rios was worth $3m to Top Rank, Danny Garcia is worth well more than that for an event.

In making the DiBella comment, it is obviously clear that for DiBella/Barclays Center/Showtime/Haymon, Golovkin-Jacobs is a massive event where'd they have far fewer qualms putting up the money than K2/HBO/Madison Square Garden; the bid won't have to get anywhere near $5m because I doubt that K2, looking at the finances for the fight on their end (what HBO is willing to put up, what they can project as revenue from the gate, etc), is willing to leave the company in position to lose money.

The "king of Brooklyn" facing the 'middleweight king' in Brooklyn is an event onto it's own.

hilarious to see you trying to question someone else's intelligience.

Danny Garcia is not being positioned anything like Dela Hoya! LOL!!! Dela Hoya was active and taking good fights at that stage. Garcia has reached a point where he's being protected and moved carefully. After he should've lost to Herrera, it was Salka, then the weight-adjusted fight with Peterson, then shot fighters in Guerrero & Mallinaggi. LOL, Dela Hoya.... Garcia wants more money b/c he wants to cash out his '0'. He's not worth a quarter of what your delusional ass is claiming, lol!!!


It's funny you claim to know what K2 will be willing to offer in comparison to Haymon. Loeffler already made it clear they'll be taking the fight to ppv, and again with a $4-5mill purse bid, Danny makes less than the $1.5mill K2 already approached him with based on the structure of the Lemieux deal. Again you're delusional if you think they value Danny that much. Espinoza's only interest in Danny is to c*ck-block him being a victim on HBO for their star fighter.

You talked about all the non-ppv money - gate, international tv, K2's very aware of what the value of those sources are since they've been far more successful at tapping into those sources than anyone on the Haymon roster.

I see you're still clueless on the new NY health insurance law. The 'Face of Brooklyn' is done fighting in Brooklyn. Danny Jacobs is not a draw, and that's why his team is putting him on Friday Night Fights in Las Vegas at the little Cosmo.

When it comes time for a purse bid, Danny will have two choices, vacate with an excuse over his feminine problems or accept the offer K2 presents.

[Scipio2009]

Danny Garcia is not being positioned anything like Dela Hoya! LOL!!! Dela Hoya was active and taking good fights at that stage. Garcia has reached a point where he's being protected and moved carefully. After he should've lost to Herrera, it was Salka, then the weight-adjusted fight with Peterson, then shot fighters in Guerrero & Mallinaggi. LOL, Dela Hoya.... Garcia wants more money b/c he wants to cash out his '0'. He's not worth a quarter of what your delusional ass is claiming, lol!!!


It's funny you claim to know what K2 will be willing to offer in comparison to Haymon. Loeffler already made it clear they'll be taking the fight to ppv, and again with a $4-5mill purse bid, Danny makes less than the $1.5mill K2 already approached him with based on the structure of the Lemieux deal. Again you're delusional if you think they value Danny that much. Espinoza's only interest in Danny is to c*ck-block him being a victim on HBO for their star fighter.

You talked about all the non-ppv money - gate, international tv, K2's very aware of what the value of those sources are since they've been far more successful at tapping into those sources than anyone on the Haymon roster.

I see you're still clueless on the new NY health insurance law. The 'Face of Brooklyn' is done fighting in Brooklyn. Danny Jacobs is not a draw, and that's why his team is putting him on Friday Night Fights in Las Vegas at the little Cosmo.

When it comes time for a purse bid, Danny will have two choices, vacate with an excuse over his feminine problems or accept the offer K2 presents.

here we go:

-Lucas Matthysse, Mauricio Herrera, Lamont Peterson, Paulie Malignaggi, and Robert Guerrero were all in the top 15 at 147 when Danny fought them (Matthysse, Peterson, and Guerrero for sure being in the top 10); if you want to call that facing shot guys, I'm seriously intrigued to hear who you think is actually fighting on the level.

-If Danny Garcia isn't even worth a quarter of what "my delusional ass is claiming", why is Top Rank even wasting the time talking to him, knowing that Pacquiao's last PPV fight cost the company a ton of money?

-Jacobs-Quillin and Golovkin-Lemieux, in terms of the amount of money that was put behind their respective events, had about the same amount of money at risk. K2 felt that the only way they could even fathom putting on their fight was to go to PPV (with an fight that they weren't even confident was worth PPV to begin with); DiBella Entertainment (working the show on Jacobs/Quillin/Haymon behalf) was happy to have their fight on Showtime/SHO Extreme and not cry about it.

Jacobs-Golovkin is a bigger fight than Jacobs-Quillin was; if Showtime/Barclays Center was already willing to lay out what they did for Jacobs-Quillin, they'll be willing to do more for Jacobs-Golovkin; if you want to han your hat on "****-blocking HBO", that's on you.

-K2 doesn't have anywhere near the relationships with boxing-related parties that Haymon seems to have; if they did, they wouldn't have Golovkin heading to the UK for all of an appearance fee and the TV rights in the US/Germany.

-The fact that you're still talking about the "new NY health insurance law" (which isn't actually the concern of NY fight promoters, if you actually knew what you were talking about) lets me know what I need to know about you.

-The date hasn't been confirmed for Jacobs' next fight (though the current understanding is that he'll fight Sergio Mora), and neither has the venue. Beyond that, if the fight really is going to be on Friday, it'll likely be on SpikeTV, reaching a far wider audience than "little Friday Night Fights".