Which is the more entertaining style of boxing?

[removed]

Quote:

Originally Posted by denium

Wladimir hasn't been a "seek and destroy" fighter for over a decade. You're well known on here for being a Klitschko fan, no point in trying to deny it.

Manny Steward changed him to the American style so he wouldn't get knocked out.

I'm well aware. My point was that you bag Ward for his style yet you had no issues with Wladimir who is the biggest spoiler of the lot.


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

[The Hammer]

I'm well aware. My point was that you bag Ward for his style yet you had no issues with Wladimir who is the biggest spoiler of the lot.

Wrong. I had issues with the way Wlad fought Povetkin and others in recent years. I felt he should have been DQed against Povetkin, same as Ward should have lost by DQ against Kessler.

But unlike Ward, at least Wladimir would go for the KO, rather than running out the clock.

[baya]

i prefer the in your face neat boxer puncher ala jmm, finito and roman.

[Kigali]

I'm well aware. My point was that you bag Ward for his style yet you had no issues with Wladimir who is the biggest spoiler of the lot.

Dude just gutted a n.azi troll.

[Squ□redCircle34]

Disgusting thread

[siablo14]

counterpunching

[KLockard23]

The first and fourth choices, obviously.

[The Hammer]

Like Golovkin, Sergey Kovalev is an example of the "seek and destroy" style.

[Elroy The Great]

id pick seek n destroy but it needs better representation.