Which is the more entertaining style of boxing?
Collapse
-
skillfully seek and destroy...most exciting...most entertaining...
the thread's discussion would have been more on the merit of the styles...
but putting names on each only stretched the convos unnecessarily to fanboyism...Comment
-
In order i would say 1. skillfully seek and destroy (GGG), 2. slug it out (arreola) 3. Run, pitty-pat, arm-punch, counter, elbow (mayweather) 4. Spoil, hold, arm-clamp, push, head butt (Ward). Thing is mayweathers style isnt that exciting but at least hes dodging punches, throwing counter shots and crips punches. Ward just mauls the other person, spoils the fight and doesnt throw crisp shotsComment
-
I'm a sweet science ***, I love watching running, pitty pad shots, no knock outs, excessive holding, elbows, and headbutts.Comment
-
Klitschko wasn't a spoiler, he was a seek and destroy fighter. Watch his early fights.
As he got older and slowed down, he started clinching and spoiling more. My being less of a fan of his has to do with his spoiling and fouling against Povetkin.
Here's Klitschko 2001:
Comment
-
Wladimir hasn't been a "seek and destroy" fighter for over a decade. You're well known on here for being a Klitschko fan, no point in trying to deny it.Klitschko wasn't a spoiler, he was a seek and destroy fighter. Watch his early fights.
As he got older and slowed down, he started clinching and spoiling more. My being less of a fan of his has to do with his spoiling and fouling against Povetkin.
Here's Klitschko 2001:
Comment
-
Comment
Comment