Give me some good reasons why ggg should not move up in weight to get the challenging fights he needs to propel his career.
Why Shouldnt ggg move up in weight???
Collapse
-
The names are at 147-154, lets face it. NO NAME above will provide the kind of recognition that fighters like brook, floydina, canela, cotta do. Boxing fans are dumb, no offense, so when they see names they recognize years from now they go like "duurr look he beat the known fighters". They dont even remember the catchweights or circumstances, look at floyds resume.
Nobody will remember ward or any of the bums up there. Only name worth fighting is Kovalev and you aint moving two divisions just for one name and then wat?Last edited by The Problem Child; 07-13-2016, 06:55 PM.Comment
-
-
That's what Kell is doing you coward.The names are at 147-154, lets face it. NO NAME above will provide the kind of recognition that fighters like brook, floydina, canela, cotta do. Boxing fans are dumb, no offense, so when they see names tey recognize years from now they go like "duurr look he beat the known fighters". They dont even remember the catghweights or circumstances, look at floyds resume.
Nobody will remember ward or any of the bums up there. Only name worth fighting is Kovalev and you aint moving two divisions just for one name and then wat?Comment
-
The names are at 147-154, lets face it. NO NAME above will provide the kind of recognition that fighters like brook, floydina, canela, cotta do. Boxing fans are dumb, no offense, so when they see names tey recognize years from now they go like "duurr look he beat the known fighters". They dont even remember the catghweights or circumstances, look at floyds resume.
Nobody will remember ward or any of the bums up there. Only name worth fighting is Kovalev and you aint moving two divisions just for one name and then wat?
You know I like you, so imma let this one ride.
But no, just, no...Comment
-
-
Comment
Comment