Is Trout vs Brook a mismatch?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • _Maxi
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Feb 2015
    • 8978
    • 509
    • 718
    • 91,740

    #11
    If the logic is terrible YOU HAVE TO PROVE THAT IT'S TERRIBLE.

    You all like to pretend you're smart and know about logic, and you can't even make an argument. All you do is go straight to your conclusions. "Maxi you suck, maxi your logic sucks". You have to be able to explain it. Assh'0les.

    Comment

    • -PBP-
      32 Time World Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jan 2012
      • 24107
      • 836
      • 635
      • 34,297

      #12
      Originally posted by _Maxi
      If the logic is terrible YOU HAVE TO PROVE THAT IT'S TERRIBLE.

      You all like to pretend you're smart and know about logic, and you can't even make an argument. All you do is go straight to your conclusions. "Maxi you suck, maxi your logic sucks". You have to be able to explain it. Assh'0les.
      Maxi, your threads are so terrible I don't even know how to present a counter argument. I know what you're trying to imply but it's just pure, unadulterated fail.

      Austin Trout is like the most random fighter in boxing. How do you come up with this ****? Did you just wake up and say "I know what NSB is missing. A thread on Austin Trout"

      I mean what's next? A thread about Jack Culcay?

      Comment

      • TheCell8
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Mar 2016
        • 5551
        • 353
        • 44
        • 38,715

        #13
        Brook would utterly destroy Trout...

        Comment

        • b00g13man
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Dec 2012
          • 12197
          • 265
          • 51
          • 34,905

          #14


          This is ****ing hilarious. What a numpty.

          Comment

          • Sugar Adam Ali
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2013
            • 27630
            • 970
            • 1,174
            • 82,827

            #15
            Good fight.. A much closer fight on paper than ggg-Brooks

            Comment

            • Crazylegs77
              null and void
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jan 2008
              • 13101
              • 445
              • 296
              • 21,573

              #16
              Originally posted by _Maxi
              What if Trout and Brook fought at 154? would it be a mismatch worse than GGG-Brook?
              Trout is shot, Brook would beat him id wager.

              Comment

              • boliodogs
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • May 2008
                • 33358
                • 824
                • 1,782
                • 309,589

                #17
                I don't think Trout is as good as when he fought Canelo. Ever since that fight his chin seems weaker. I think Brook would have a good chance to win although I favor Trout to win.

                Comment

                • _Maxi
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Feb 2015
                  • 8978
                  • 509
                  • 718
                  • 91,740

                  #18
                  Originally posted by -PBP-
                  Maxi, your threads are so terrible I don't even know how to present a counter argument. I know what you're trying to imply but it's just pure, unadulterated fail.

                  Austin Trout is like the most random fighter in boxing. How do you come up with this ****? Did you just wake up and say "I know what NSB is missing. A thread on Austin Trout"

                  I mean what's next? A thread about Jack Culcay?
                  Change Trout for Canelo at 154 then.

                  Comment

                  • Death_Adder
                    Banned
                    • Sep 2013
                    • 3456
                    • 305
                    • 280
                    • 34,499

                    #19
                    Originally posted by _Maxi
                    Change Trout for Canelo at 154 then.
                    Maxi Pad, you suck. Maxi Pad, your logic sucks.

                    Trout vs Brook wouldn't be a a mismatch. They're both about the same height and only ONE weigh division apart. It's not inconceivable or un-natural for a champion fighter to jump up ONE division and fight a guy on the downside of his career. Infact, it's happened many, many times.

                    Same could be said about Canelo, jumping up ONE division to fight at 154 or at Caneloweight, ONE division +1 pound. That's where the whole controversy is, whether Canelo is a Middleweight or not.

                    GGG, is different, he's TWO whole division higher. Fights at full 160.

                    Like everyone is saying, you suck and so does your logic.

                    Comment

                    • TAZ-G
                      Contender
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • Nov 2014
                      • 289
                      • 13
                      • 114
                      • 9,397

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Eastcoast
                      Trout looks past it, I'd favor Brook. I'd also favor Brook to beat Liam Smith.
                      In second of half of his fight with one of the Charlo twins he boxed extremely well.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP