Originally posted by Dr.Cool
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Hearn Sees Upset: Golovkin Never Boxed an Elite Level Fighter!
Collapse
-
-
Ah we see the same mistake being made here, people trying to talk down Golovkin's opponents. Former world champions and current champions in Daniel Geale, Lemieux and Rubio were made to look ordinary, such is the skill of GGG. Martin Murray? The only man to stop him was GGG. Wade was undefeated but made to look amateur. Against other opponents his foes are elite. Against GGG they are bums lol. I laugh at the term 'bum' used by keyboard warriors. GGG can beat them all but only a welterweight in Brook was willing to take the challenge. Shame on Canelo, Eubank and Saunders.
Leave a comment:
-
An amazing amateur career followed by a great pro career, yet G is 34 years old and still has never fought an elite opponent. And Brook sure hasn't proved he is elite. Somehow every other top fighter has at least one good name on their record except for G. It has become more than obvious that it is G who refuses to fight the best and not the other way around. His fans claim he was willing to fight Ward despite Loeffler straight saying he wouldn't! He wouldn't agree to fighting Froch at 168 despite begging for that fight for years. Lara is the most accomplished SWW or MW out there right now. Canelo was willing to fight, just not at 160. Which one would think wouldn't be a problem since G has said for years how he will fight anyone from 154-168. And then he refuses to fight the biggest money fight possible. Literally. Yet he makes deals with Wade and Brook in a single day! Golovkin was a rising star casual fans wanted to see. Not anymore though. They have seen him beat enough tomato cans. Everyone saw Butterbean do the same thing. Now he is facing someone two divisions lower and isn't even the most proven fighter at WW! If you are a p4p fighter there is no way you should be fighting someone two divisions lower who isn't even the best in that division. Yet his fans will justify anything he does. Real fans of boxing want to see the best fight the best. And that is one thing Golovkin has literally never done. Everytime it is everyone else's fault. Never mind Jacobs and a plethora of fighters at 154. Also some great match-ups at 168. And yet we are stuck with him fighting the likes of Rubio and Wade. He has held a belt for five years and still hasn't fought an elite fighter. There is no excuse for that. None.
Leave a comment:
-
Thurman has a better resume than Brook
Its not just one win, he has multiple wins over decent comp level Guerrero, Chaves, Collazo, Karass, Diaz, Bundu.
All Brook has is Porter....
Thurman has faced a variety of styles, gone through hell and put in the ground work.
Brook has avoided a number of fighters, and 99.9% of his resume consists of bums.
Brook is not elite..one win doesn't make you elite, Brook never proved himself at 147....we still don't know how he would have coped with the many different styles.
Thurman actually went through the gauntletLast edited by FrankieBruno; 07-10-2016, 10:25 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Progrssive_Jedi View PostBrook bests Porter it isn't crap. But Thurman does and it's a huge win. The ****.
Leave a comment:
-
LOL. Now Brook is am elite level fighter.
Holy **** I've heard it all.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Progrssive_Jedi View PostBrook bests Porter it isn't crap. But Thurman does and it's a huge win. The ****.
In history! Right.
I think odds are 7-1 here. What are powerball's odds.
Accomplished how, getting a title. Lemiuex held MW version of Brook's strap I think. Brook is a big WW who can fight though.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: