Comments Thread For: WBC Prez: Golovkin Had No Choice, So Many Refused To Fight Him!

[icha]

being forced to vacate or being stripped is the same thing. Only morons like you would nit-pick the difference because your life is so pathetic that you have to defend Canelo to the death. "He wasn't stripped, he vacated instead of fighting Golovkin." Yeah, because that's so much more honourable.

For the record the other guy said he was stripped and I wasn't going to correct him because anyone who isn't a fanboy knows that being forced to vacate and being stripped is pretty much the same. You can argue all you want about definitions but the result is the same and the reason he vacated was Golovkin and the reason he would have been stripped is Golovkin. Do you not see how petty and ****** what you're saying is?

Stop being a pathetic fanboy man. Canelo nor golovkin should be defended for their recent actions.

so the wbc stripped canelo??
where did i defend canelo??
you can say is just as bad and im not even discussing that...

[casheddie]

Sulaiman trying to save face. He stripped one MW for fighting smaller guys and then the person he gives the belt to chooses an opponent with an ever bigger weight disparity. LOL

False statement, He stripped Canelo, the orange bitch, for not fighting a mandatory, not for fighting Khan. And at least the weight is standard, GGG didn't have a pick a weight out of a hat like Canelo did.

[casheddie]

Sulaiman trying to save face. He stripped one MW for fighting smaller guys and then the person he gives the belt to chooses an opponent with an ever bigger weight disparity. LOL

Idc about what the WBC has to say, I wanna hear from the coward Mendoza at WBA for why he didn't order GGG-Jacobs like he promised. Another coward goes quiet.

[El-blanco]

so the wbc stripped canelo??
where did i defend canelo??
you can say is just as bad and im not even discussing that...

You've completely lost the point. The other guy said Canelo was stripped(forced to vacate) because he was fighting smaller guys. Which wasn't true. That's why I called him a moron. What you've spun this into is ******ed and stinks of fanboy-ism. Have a good day.

[icha]

You've completely lost the point. The other guy said Canelo was stripped(forced to vacate) because he was fighting smaller guys. Which wasn't true. That's why I called him a moron. What you've spun this into is ******ed and stinks of fanboy-ism. Have a good day.

they guy was wrong and you called him a moron, but you were also wrong about canelo being stripped... im not discussing anything else cuz i know canelo did wrong... he shouldnt have fought for the title in the first place...

[Dean_Razorback]

Sulaiman trying to save face. He stripped one MW for fighting smaller guys and then the person he gives the belt to chooses an opponent with an ever bigger weight disparity. LOL

he didn't strip canelo, canelo vacated the belt

[Code Red]

This statement shows that Suliaman acknowledges that this is a sh-t fight that should of never been made....when you got to make an excuse for signing a fight you know its ****ed up!

[PunchyPotorff]

From all major sanctioning bodies, there are easily a dozen top 10-15 MWs who would've worked out fine, yet GG picks a guy 2 weight classes lower. And his people say that's nothing like the Canelo/Khan situation. And Stooly Man says it's a good and necessary matchup given the circumstances. Someone(s) needs to look in the dictionary under 'contradiction'.

[Larry the boss]

Suck it haters! Now youve heard it straight from the horses mouth. Kudos to WBC for finally putting Andre coWard on blast

Where in that article was Ward even mentioned?

[Hov]

isn't this the same person that said Kovalev ducked Stevenson by backing out of the purse bid. People didn't believe him the but now his word is gospel? Funny