Once again, we're ignoring that Sanchez said Golovkin was going to 168. Seems to be a real inconvenient truth as it makes fighting a welter look even more ridiculous.
Would You Have Preferred John Ryder vs GGG instead of Brook?
Collapse
-
GGG/Ryder would be mostly met with indifference, which is a worse response than (real or fake) outrage. Try to think of it from Hearn's perspective, who would be in charge of selling that to us. GGG/Brook has a built-in hook, regardless of how much we dislike it. If anyone should be facing Ryder, it's Eubank.Last edited by kiaba360; 07-09-2016, 07:46 PM.Comment
Comment