Guys hating on GGG Brook also hating on Hagler facing Duran and co?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kafkod
    I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2013
    • 24754
    • 2,176
    • 1,789
    • 405,373

    #31
    Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra
    Just two weeks ago Tom Loeffler said the Jacobs fight would have to be PPV and they would have to sit down with the WBA to see when the timing was right and that they hadn't spoken to Jacobs people. So K2 is saying the same thing Jacobs said. The money isn't there for the fight yet. It starts at 12:11

    https://www.facebook.com/UCNLive/vid...1149310014767/
    Well what do you know ... the A side gets the flick and li'l b side gets exactly the same deal for fighting somebody else instead!

    "Li'l g needs Eubank Jnr doe ... "

    Comment

    • Godsfly
      mental hospital toughness
      • Aug 2012
      • 4893
      • 369
      • 68
      • 22,498

      #32
      Originally posted by SkillspayBills
      The pathetic hypocrisy running rampant on this site never ceases to amaze me.
      it has gotten out of control up in here

      Comment

      • Jubei
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jun 2009
        • 6678
        • 457
        • 286
        • 56,728

        #33
        Originally posted by Ray*
        I remember trying to educate GGG fanatics on how a GGG-Lara fight is NOT a bad fight, they kept telling me Lara has to fight at 160 first, my answer was Hagler - Mugabi fought at 160, mugabi fought exclusively at 154 at that time. Now they want to defend 147 fighter coming up to 160? I have already seen the "Brook is a big welterweight" " He would weight more than GGG on fight night".

        At the end of the day you got to feel ****** when you flip and flop just to defend your comments due to your fanatics mentality.
        Daniel (houston, tx) [via mobile] [via mobile]
        Ill watch and enjoy, but i kinda would have rather seen GGG beating up Lara than watch him kill Brook. At the end of the day it would have been the best 160 fighting the best 154.
        Dan Rafael, King Fight Freak (2:04 PM)
        GGG-Brook is like 50 times bigger than a fight with the sprinter.

        Comment

        • hhs661
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Mar 2010
          • 6467
          • 409
          • 417
          • 20,927

          #34
          I see the capes are out in full force all over the place

          Comment

          • Ray*
            Be safe!!!
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jul 2005
            • 44867
            • 1,654
            • 1,608
            • 558,890

            #35
            Originally posted by Jubei
            Daniel (houston, tx) [via mobile] [via mobile]


            Dan Rafael, King Fight Freak (2:04 PM)
            The Irony of a fatso calling a boxer a sprinter Lol. Fat Dan does make you laugh.

            Comment

            • New England
              Strong champion.
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2010
              • 37514
              • 1,926
              • 1,486
              • 97,173

              #36
              Originally posted by Godsfly
              golovkin could **** on a back and sell it to some of these posters.......



              it's all his fans fault. u baby him, come up with excuses, AFRAID if he goes up in weight. troll. so he has no motivation to do anything else but take the most money for the lowest threat. in this case fighting a chinny welterweight LMAO


              i don't understand why it is so hard to be objective. golovkin is the most avoided fighter in boxing. add eubanks to the list of guys who have blatantly ducked him.


              the brook fight sucks! it sucks and i'm pissed! don't confuse a fanboy who disregards that for an objective poster who sees two sides to the coin. the best MW on the planet, and a pound for pounder, shoudn't fight a welterweight unless his name is prime floyd or prime manny.

              but it's happening because golovkin has been ducked by canelo [we don't **** around!]

              and after canelo, he was ducked by eubank jr. dude canelo fought a smaller, chinny, fading welterweight who is ducking brook! do you guys forget this stuff because it fits your agenda if you completely disregard it?

              yes, i'd like an actual middleweight. but let's first blame canelo for all of this. then eubanks. then jacobs. then quillin. then saunders. then froch. then chavez. then martinez. then cotto. then sturm. then ndam.

              you get the idea. golovkin is the most avoided fighter in boxing. it's not productive to blame him for his matchmaking if it's going to make you forget that these guys are ducking him.



              just say it with me, "golovkin is the most avoided fighter in boxing."



              i'm sorry, guys. you're really losing me. you are. this fight sucks. canelo ducked golovkin and fought amir f#cking khan, which caused all of this.
              Last edited by New England; 07-08-2016, 04:57 PM.

              Comment

              • Jubei
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jun 2009
                • 6678
                • 457
                • 286
                • 56,728

                #37
                Originally posted by New England
                i don't understand why it is so hard to be objective. golovkin is the most avoided fighter in boxing. add eubanks to the list of guys who have blatantly ducked him.


                the brook fight sucks! it sucks and i'm pissed! don't confuse a fanboy who disregards that for an objective poster who sees two sides to the coin. the best MW on the planet, and a pound for pounder, shoudn't fight a welterweight unless his name is prime floyd or prime manny.

                but it's happening because golovkin has been ducked by canelo [we don't **** around!]

                and after canelo, he was ducked by eubank jr.

                yes, i'd like an actual middleweight. but let's first blame canelo for all of this. then eubanks. then jacobs. then quillin. then saunders. then froch. then chavez. then martinez. then cotto. then sturm. then ndam.

                you get the idea. golovkin is the most avoided fighter in boxing. it's not productive to blame him for his matchmaking if it's going to make you forget that these guys are ducking him.



                just say it with me, "golovkin is the most avoided fighter in boxing."
                Wow, really have to agree with you lately. How things change!

                Comment

                • _original_
                  Dinamita
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jul 2009
                  • 17838
                  • 1,872
                  • 789
                  • 67,167

                  #38
                  Originally posted by New England
                  i don't understand why it is so hard to be objective. golovkin is the most avoided fighter in boxing. add eubanks to the list of guys who have blatantly ducked him.


                  the brook fight sucks! it sucks and i'm pissed! don't confuse a fanboy who disregards that for an objective poster who sees two sides to the coin. the best MW on the planet, and a pound for pounder, shoudn't fight a welterweight unless his name is prime floyd or prime manny.

                  but it's happening because golovkin has been ducked by canelo [we don't **** around!]

                  and after canelo, he was ducked by eubank jr. dude canelo fought a smaller, chinny, fading welterweight who is ducking brook! do you guys forget this stuff because it fits your agenda if you completely disregard it?

                  yes, i'd like an actual middleweight. but let's first blame canelo for all of this. then eubanks. then jacobs. then quillin. then saunders. then froch. then chavez. then martinez. then cotto. then sturm. then ndam.

                  you get the idea. golovkin is the most avoided fighter in boxing. it's not productive to blame him for his matchmaking if it's going to make you forget that these guys are ducking him.



                  just say it with me, "golovkin is the most avoided fighter in boxing."



                  i'm sorry, guys. you're really losing me. you are. this fight sucks. canelo ducked golovkin and fought amir f#cking khan, which caused all of this.
                  Lol most avoided when he clearly ducked the guy in you avatar. Let's keep it 100 here, Boston.

                  And at least Nelo fought Khan at a fair weight.

                  Comment

                  • Motorcity Cobra
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Mar 2016
                    • 32565
                    • 1,106
                    • 545
                    • 963,610

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Jubei
                    Jacobs says Golovkin fight can happen in 1 1/2 years from now
                    date June 27th, 2016 - 41 Comments



                    However you spin it, Jacobs was not available to fight in September. What is your point again?
                    That's the same thing Loeffler said in the video I posted. So K2 and Jacobs are saying the fight needs to be built and the money isn't there for the fight. Thanks for agreeing with me

                    Comment

                    • icha
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Apr 2013
                      • 9506
                      • 328
                      • 368
                      • 78,629

                      #40
                      Originally posted by New England
                      i don't understand why it is so hard to be objective. golovkin is the most avoided fighter in boxing. add eubanks to the list of guys who have blatantly ducked him.


                      the brook fight sucks! it sucks and i'm pissed! don't confuse a fanboy who disregards that for an objective poster who sees two sides to the coin. the best MW on the planet, and a pound for pounder, shoudn't fight a welterweight unless his name is prime floyd or prime manny.

                      but it's happening because golovkin has been ducked by canelo [we don't **** around!]

                      and after canelo, he was ducked by eubank jr. dude canelo fought a smaller, chinny, fading welterweight who is ducking brook! do you guys forget this stuff because it fits your agenda if you completely disregard it?

                      yes, i'd like an actual middleweight. but let's first blame canelo for all of this. then eubanks. then jacobs. then quillin. then saunders. then froch. then chavez. then martinez. then cotto. then sturm. then ndam.

                      you get the idea. golovkin is the most avoided fighter in boxing. it's not productive to blame him for his matchmaking if it's going to make you forget that these guys are ducking him.



                      just say it with me, "golovkin is the most avoided fighter in boxing."



                      i'm sorry, guys. you're really losing me. you are. this fight sucks. canelo ducked golovkin and fought amir f#cking khan, which caused all of this.
                      canelo didnt force ggg to fight brook, ggg could have said no thanks im not a businessman like canelo... brook was the only available from the promoter he was already in talks, but there is a lot more fighters at MW and at two others divisions closer to 160(154 and 168), if ggg fights bradley after brook, is he also going to blame canelo??


                      Last edited by icha; 07-08-2016, 05:25 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP